Preview

Federalists and Democratic-Republicans as Permanent Political Parties

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1007 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans as Permanent Political Parties
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the U.S. with permanent political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. When the political parties were created, people they might believed weaken the unity of the U.S., but they checked and balanced each other out to make sure there would be no tyrannical party ruler. As the Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely, mainly using the elastic clause, they were able to create and pass laws that were not directly stated in the Constitution, which the Democratic-Republicans would then argue as invalid. During the period from 1800 to 1824, both the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans stayed true to their traditional principles; however, both parties evolved and compromised their ideals during the endless conflict of the strengthening of the governments powers and adaptation to the never-ending disagreements political parties, according to what was needed at the time. Democratic-Republican ideals included interpreting the Constitution strictly and pushing westward for more land for an agrarian republic. The tenth amendment granted states rights to govern themselves if the powers were not given to the federal government by the Constitution or prohibited. This amendment played a big role in Democratic-Republicanism ideas, because they argued that every power not listed in the Constitution was given to the states, without consideration about the elastic clause. These main principles of interpreting the Constitution strictly were kept traditional even though different occurances called for changes. In Thomas Jefferson's letter to Gideon Granger, he argued that the Federalists were over-assuming powers that were not granted by the Constitution (Document A). The Democratic-Republicans did not accept the amending of the Constitution with the Federalist loose interpretation ideas in mind, and therefore is why these aspects were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting in the years 1801-1817 there was a separation in the United States. The Federalists and Dem-Rep parties were basically opposites of each other. The Republicans were usually seen as strict constructionists, who opposed the broad constructionism of both Jefferson and Madison who were Federalists. In both, Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidencies they highlighted Federalists ideals in their decisions, including Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict over foreign and domestic policies between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the development of two political parties. Although the Jeffersonian-Democratic were strict constructionist and the Federalists were loose constructionists, both failed to be consistent and chose whichever interpretation that better served their interests at the time.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This means that they think that the Constitution should be interpreted much more strictly with less federal government. They knew the federal government needed power, but they believed that people should have more say. “They accepted the idea of implied powers, but in a much more limited sense.” The Democratic-Republicans thought the implied powers would apply less to the federal and more to the state government. Although the federal government had certain implied powers, the Democratic-Republicans believed most powers not directly given to the federal government should belong to the people. “They believed that implied powers are those powers that are ‘absolutely necessary.’” In this quote they are referring to the elastic clause, or the part in the Constitution that can be interpreted in many ways. The Democratic-Republicans belief in the elastic clause is the way it was originally intended; only to use federal force if “absolutely necessary.” As you can see both parties had very different interpretations of the…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States’ government first started, there were no political parties. However during the 1790s two different parties formed, the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. What led to the rise of these different political parties though? What led to the rise of the political parties in the 1790s was the different views as to how the government should be run, the different ways of interpreting the Constitution, and how people viewed the Sedition Act.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1800 Jefferson entered office with the intention to move away from the Federalist policies of Washington and Adams and to put the nation onto a path that he thought would be best. He wished to minimize the power of the central government by strengthening the state governments. “Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government…” (Document A). Jefferson and the Republican Party envisioned a government that was going to work for the people, a government with the people’s interests at heart. They believed that having stronger state governments would accomplish this. The leaders of a state were closer to the people they were governing; therefore they should know what the public needed. Document B refers to Jefferson’s belief in the strict interpretation of the Constitution, especially when it is about the freedom of religion. “Certainly no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to the general [federal] government. It must then rest with the states, as far as it can be in any human authority…” It is clear that Jefferson believes that the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays