Preview

Femininity As Disciplinary Regime Barthky Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3059 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Femininity As Disciplinary Regime Barthky Analysis
Sandra, Lee Bartky “Femininity as Disciplinary Regime.”

our society women are often pressured and conditioned to conform to traditional feminine standards. In the past fifty or so years women have begun to find modes of resistance against these cultural constraints. Bartky theorizes about the properly feminine subject by stating that it is to embody the proper feminine qualities of character and behaviors. According to Bartky the properly feminine woman must be sure to never appear sloppy or loose. The properly feminine woman should also allow herself to physically controlled by male companions to a certain extent. She must allow the man to lead her around almost like a dog on a leash. Bartky talks about the properly feminine body and how every movement is to be done a certain way in order to seem feminine. It is like when a mother tells her daughter “Don’t sit with your legs open, its not lady-like”. Bartky talks about how the proper feminine body must display itself within the proper
…show more content…
For heterosexuals, straight marriage would remain the most significant--and only legal social bond. Gay marriage could only delegitimize straight marriage if it were a real alternative to it, and this is clearly not true. To put it bluntly, there's precious little evidence that straights could be persuaded by any law to have sex with--let alone marry--someone of their own sex. The only possible effect of this sort would be to persuade gay men and women who force themselves into heterosexual marriage (often at appalling cost to themselves and their families) to find a focus for their family instincts in a more personally positive environment. But this is clearly a plus, not a minus: gay marriage could both avoid a lot of tortured families and create the possibility for many happier ones. It is not, in short, a denial of family values. It's an extension of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is still skepticism from opinions that range in a form of discrimination because neglect is present. Their demand to be able to enjoy the benefits and recognition of being married are irrelevant showing an effect on the family as a whole. Because it is so controversial it gives way to confusion in establishing the fact, that it is indeed a marriage that same-sex couples share with one another. In my opinion they have put same-sex couples as second class status and deemed there is little room to recognize their form of long term relationship. Same-sex couples have been denied the benefits that heterosexual couples are given. The mode of acceptance in society has not improved, even though there are indications that this change in opinion, will prove to be beneficial for all society today. Repetition of inequality of rights through past history has shown its devastations of cruelty on society or have we forgotten this…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal marriage is a matter of essential universal and equal rights. Despite all, fairness and dignity of gay couples should be respected. Here are some ethical and social arguments for the legislation of gay marriage that would benefit us all. Studies have constantly revealed that married people tend to be better off financially, emotionally, psychologically and even medically. Moreover, psychologically, the feature of marriage establishes official and public relationships that make it easier for people to support each other, giving them the capability and skill to grow stronger. The support can be on different levels, especially in hard situations like medical issues. The chosen life partner would be able to take things in charge. Moreover, we all know that gay couples adopt babies. When it would come to adopting and raising the children, they would be living in a steady married household making them feel like any other of their classmates. In addition allowing same sex marriage would assist to a better integration of their relationships into society. Therefore, if two people are committed and are able to create a suitable union and provide love and care for their families then why not let them marry? It would do good to the stability and consistency of our society in…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The dynamics of marriage have changed though; the definition of what marriage is coming into question. Is marriage only between a man and a woman? My personal opinion is that anyone should be able to marry, but the best design for a family is one of a man and woman. Many would object to this strict definition, but the impact of a child raised by a gay or lesbian couple must be taken into account. Bulling is a reality and children with different situations at home are easier to fall prey to it. Some might also have an issue with a gay or lesbian raising a child of the same sex. These same people would argue they would offer a very unorthodox home that condones same sex relationships. Another issue that has faced families in the last few decades is that of income. Women in our society have more freedom than ever before. Women now more often than not account for an equal share of the household income, making raising a family more difficult. In the past women were only expected to raise the children, but now bringing home an income is also necessary. The ways we view and have changed marriage today will forever shape our society for generations to come…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Butler’s most famous published work, Gender Trouble, deals with themes of the semiotics of the human body in juxtaposition to the “performative subversions” of gender identity (Butler, “Gender” 372). There is a pervading discussion of internal versus external signifiers of the body. The external signifiers are “shaped by political forces with strategic interests” as well as social and cultural hegemony (374). She also makes clear distinctions in defining what is gender as opposed to sex or sexuality and the common misunderstandings of the three terms. Simon During republished the third chapter of Gender Trouble, titled “Subversive Bodily Acts,” in a volume accompanied by highly informative introductory material. The essence of Butler’s entire book is contained within this third and final chapter of the work, followed in its original form only by a conclusion.…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The position of women in the society at present has changed gradually in the last few centuries. The role of women, as dictated by the society, is perceived by how they’re presented. Since the last three centuries, women have always been viewed as just housewives and objects of perversion.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Society sees marriage as a sacred act of commitment and believes that same-sex marriage will end the purity of such…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is traditionally viewed as the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife. However, what happens when those two people are two men or two women? This topic of gay marriage has been a major issue in the United States over the past few years. It has raised several political debates as well as other minor arguments throughout the United States and around the world. Until recently, homosexual couples in the United States were allowed to marry. Recently, a series of events change the standing of homosexual marriages in the United States. The Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas repealed a Texas law that made sodomy a crime in order to affirm the privacy rights of homosexuals. In November 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot deny marriage licenses to homosexual couples. Following the Massachusetts decision, more gay marriages occurred publicly across the nation from San Francisco to New York. President George W. Bush responded to these activities by urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. On May 17, 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to grant legalized same-sex marriages.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Allowing homosexuals to participate in marriage will not degrade the institution of marriage. Who has the power to declare that marriage should only be between a man and a woman? No matter what, it all comes down to the fact that marriage is about love, sharing, and commitment. The separation of church and state should contribute to the outcome of this issue, being in favor of the gay community.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolish Marriage

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, if marriage were abolished, would it eliminate the various state and federal benefits couples enjoy? Most of us today are concerned about money and how we can save and make the most of it. Federal and state benefits provide benefits to married couples such as tax credits, spousal veterans’ benefits, joint insurance plans, martial confidence privileges, and much more. If marriage were privatized, would most of these benefits go away because they are federally established benefits for married couples? This point alone would sway most married couples away from privatizing marriages because of the fear of it hurting their bank account. What about the confidence privilege? If federal marriage was ended, a spouse could be asked to testify against their spouse in court. Basic laws are in place for married couples to forbid this. This would be a huge disadvantage because married couples know should know each other better than anyone else.…

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing Gay Marriage

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage doesn’t threaten the honor of “traditional” marriage. When same-sex parents get married, they will probably want to raise a family, which doesn’t threaten “traditional” marriage at all. For years, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain have legalized gay marriage without signs of damage to heterosexual couples. Social lives in these countries continue unchanged with no increases appearing in the divorce rate. I personally say that gay marriage doesn’t damage “traditional” marriage to any extent. Opponents to gay marriage argue that by allowing gay marriage, marriage between a…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Rights

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You may not think about it, but gays have family values too. They have many strong family benefits that some straight marriages lack, such as being more open-minded and accepting. Gay couples have even been proven to have stronger emotional bonds than straight couples. And since 2 people of the same sex can't reproduce on their own, child adoption rates would increase. Strong family benefits and strong emotional bonds are essential to long-lasting relationships and marriages. In fact, a small percentage of straight marriages end early in divorce because one of the spouses finds out that they're gay; they're not "in…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honestly there are pro’s and con’s to every situation. Most people seem to be agreeing with the con-side on this condition. The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as between a man and a woman. In the Oct. 15, 1971 decision Baker v. Nelson (186 KB , the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.” Marriage is already threatened with high divorce rates (between 40% and 50%) (851 KB) and with 40.6% of babies being born to unmarried mothers (312 KB) in 2008. Allowing same-sex couples to marry would further weaken the institution. Gay marriage could potentially lead down a "slippery slope” ending with giving people in polygamous, incestuous, bestial, and other nontraditional relationships the right to marry. [10] Glen Lavy, JD, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, argued in a May 21, 2008 Los Angeles Times Op-Ed, "The movement for polygamy and polyamory is poised to use the successes of same-sex couples as a springboard for further de-institutionalizing marriage." Gay marriage is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. The Catholic Church, Presbyterian Church, Islam, United Methodist Church, Southern Baptist Convention, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, National Association of Evangelicals, and American Baptist Churches USA all oppose same-sex marriage. Expanding marriage to include same-sex couples may lead to churches being forced to marry couples and children being taught in school that same-sex marriage is the same as opposite-sex marriage. People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they find wrong. Gay marriage would entitle gay couples to typical marriage benefits including claiming a tax exemption for a spouse, receiving social security payments from a deceased spouse, and coverage by a spouse’s…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marraige

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In my opinion, same sex marriage would be a great opportunity for social progress. Two people who love each other should be able to publicly celebrate their commitment. It does not and should not hurt anybody else if it was allowed, and denying them is a violation of freedom. Denying them this opportunity can cause serious psychological damage and can make them feel little and not a part of the community. By allowing same sex marriage, it helps adoption because there are many problems with gay couples choosing to conceive a child, since 2000 the adoption by same sex couples has doubled. Allowing same sex marriage will almost guarantee that the adoption rate will rise even higher.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hcyepw

    • 3041 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Supporters of gay marriage claim it will not hurt anyone, but there would be both immediate and long-term harms that would come from legalizing same sex marriage. Among the immediate effects would be taxpayer subsidies to homosexuals, including Social Security benefits, the teaching of homosexual values in public schools, and threats to religious liberty when churches and religious institutions are challenged not to discriminate against gays. Longer-term effects would include fewer people marrying, fewer sexually faithful relationships, more divorces, fewer children being raised by both a mother and a father, a falling birth rate, and demands for recognition of polygamy as a legitimate form of marriage.…

    • 3041 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics