Preview

Fiduciary and Company

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2683 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiduciary and Company
Introduction
The concept of fiduciary obligations or duty is one of the most important areas in Australian law. In this project, I will try to illustrate and explain the duties in three kinds of relationships including the relationship between a director and a company, the relationship between the promoters and the corporation and the relationship between business partners. In each relationship, what kinds of the fiduciary duties should be performed is elaborated in details. The aim of the project is to help the readers to understand what “fiduciary obligations” actually means in Australian law.

Fiduciary Duty of Directors
According to the general law and the Corporations Act ss181 -184, as fiduciaries, the directors must have the fairness, loyalty and good faith when they implement the discretions and powers entitled to them. They cannot use their position of trust to benefit themselves at the expenses of the business without the company’s consent and full knowledge. In other words, we can say since the directors are acting on behalf of their company, they owe the duties of loyalty and good faith due to the fiduciary relationship with the companies. In addition, refer to the Corporation Act ss180, and the case of Percival v Wright 1902, the directors owed duties to the company but not shareholders individually. On the other hand, in depth, the fiduciary obligations of the directors can be divided into four aspects: 1. Directors have the duty to act in good faith for the interests of the company
This duty arises from the general law- especially from principles of fiduciary law and ss181 and 184 of the Corporations Act. Under this duty, the directors should practice their bona fide in the way that they think is the interests of the company. Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd. This means the directors should give suitable considerations to the interests of the company as a whole in their decisions making process. However, there is difficulty in identifying which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Badm 300 Exam 3 Study Guide

    • 3935 Words
    • 16 Pages

    j. The Agent has Fiduciary Obligations to the Principal; they must act in the Principal’s best interest…

    • 3935 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law & Ethics

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The board must also consider their duty of care and duty of loyalty. Duty of care requires people involved in the company to make informed and reasonable decisions for the business. Duty of loyalty requires employees to act in good faith and in…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The course will cover the structure and governance of the corporation and the division of corporate powers; the duties and liabilities of directors and other officers; the remedies available to shareholders for the enforcement of director’s duties and protection against oppression or overreaching by controllers. The course considers these legal doctrines and theoretical perspectives as they relate to both public corporations and to small incorporated businesses.…

    • 3601 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    S180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 Commonwealth (hereinafter referred to as The Act) states that a “director or officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they:…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiduciary Principle. As part of the legal structure of a business organization, each officer and director of a company has a legal fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the stakeholders and other employees within the firm. Furthermore, there is also an implied fiduciary duty for every employee within the organization to also act in a way that generates positive benefits for the firm.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors have a FIDUCIARY relationship with the company – trust and confidence. The distinguishing obligation of a fiduciary is the OBLIGATION OF LOYALTY.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The most general obligation of a director is the duty of acting in good faith. This requires a director to always discharge the responsibilities of the office of director honestly, conscientiously, and fairly. It also requires a director to make decisions for the corporations that are in the best interests of all the corporation's shareholders and not for the advantage or benefit of one group over another.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to S.4(1) of Companies Act (CA) 1965, director includes any person occupying the position of director of a corporation by whatever name called and includes a person in accordance with those directions or instructions the directors of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director. Directors have a fiduciary duty to the company which is duty to act in good faith in best interest of the company and act for a proper purpose. In the case of Re Smith and Faweett Ltd [1942] 1 All ER 542, it established that a director must act bona fide in the interest of the company. Furthermore, under S.132(1) of CA 1965, it states that a director of a company must exercise his power at all the times for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In general, the board of directors is a group of elected or appointed members to oversee activities of a company or organization. The board of directors has a fiduciary duty to grow the long-term success of the corporation for the benefit of shareholder, and sometimes for debt holders. The basic fiduciary duty includes: 1) duty of care -duty to make/delegate decision in an informed way; 2) duty of loyalty -duty to advance corporate over personal interests; 3) duty of good faith-duty to be faithful and devoted to the interest of the corporation and its shareholders; 4) duty not to “waste” -duty to avoid deliberate destruction of shareholder value. Generally, the board of directors performs major detail functions as below: 1) provide continuity for the organization; 2) select and appoint a chief executive; 3) govern the organization by broad policies and objectives; 4) acquire sufficient resources for the organization’s operations and to finance the products and services adequately; 5) account to the public for the products and services of the organization and expenditures. The board is corporate governance of the company, which is significant for…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    corporate law

    • 959 Words
    • 3 Pages

    S 181 states that directors should exercise their powers in good faith and proper purpose. Subjective tests (which concerns whether the director acted honestly) are involved in determining the breach of good faith (Harris, Hargovan and Adams 2013). However, Harris, Hargovan and Adams (2013) also stated that since objective evidences may also be needed in determining the breach of good faith, it is easier to bypass the subject test and prove that such conduct failed to act for a proper purpose. Fiduciary duty cases at general law on the proper purpose rule are considered when determining the scope of ‘proper purpose’ in CA s 181 (2). That is to say, the two-step process proposed in Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum should be used under such circumstance to prove the improper purpose. Moreover, in the situation of mixed purposes, a ‘but for’ test proposed by Dixon J in Mills v Mills is involved to determine the motivation of an action. When it is proved that an action was performed in breach of s 181, as stated in Note 2 of s 181, a civil penalty should be imposed. Moreover, it should be mentioned that if directors exercised their power recklessly or dishonestly while breaching s 181, criminal penalties could be imposed under s 184.…

    • 959 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Directors’duties(dd): I.Duties of care and diligence:1whether is a director(d)?s9definesas:(a)appointed:(i)executive director(ii)alternative director(iii)non-executive director(iv)nominee director.(b) not validly appointed (i)they act in the position of a d (de facto d);(ii)d of coy or body are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions or wishes. (shadow d).2.duty of care and diligence:Assessing whether a breach has occurred:(i)were a reasonable d in the corp’s circumstances and(ii)has the position of d had the same responsibilities within the corp(1)must possess degree skill. Form a view as to coy's financial state; dependent on knowledge and experience.(2)exercise powers with care: take into account knowledge, experience and size of co; basic duty: guide and monitor management; be familiar and understand coy's activities and financial status(commonwealth bank of Australia v Friedrich(1991)).(3)be diligent in performance of functions:attend meetings unless exceptional circumstances(Vrisakis v Australian Securities Commission(1993));conduct periodic review of coy's financial statements(Daniels v Anderson(1995)). s180(1)(A director or other officer of a corporation must exercise their powers and discharge their duties with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they:(a)were a director or officer of a corporation in the corporation’s circumstances; and(b)occupied the office held by, and had the same responsibilities within the corporation as, the director or officer.(i)care.InDaniels v AWA Ltd, the court proposed the minimum standards of care, skill and diligence expected of all directors:(a) obtain a basic understanding of their coy's business (b) keep informed about and monitor the coy's activities and regularly attend board meetings (c) monitor the coy's financial position.All coy d owe the basic duty of sufficiently monitoring the coy’s affairs by maintaining an awareness of the coy’s activities and…

    • 7058 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don’t agree with Dunlap’s view that shareholders are the only constituencies about which corporate directors and executives should be concerned. In light of agents’ obligations to principals, managers are supposed act in the best interest of the company’s shareholders, the major capital providers, when making decisions; however, as shareholders and stakeholders interests are to a large extent compatible, especially from a long-term perspective, managers should also take into consideration the interests of multiple constituencies when operating a company. For example, both shareholders and customers may benefit from a company’s successful research and development (R&D) projects on cutting-edge products as customers can have high-value products while shareholders may profit considerably from the sales. Meanwhile, like shareholders, stakeholders also have their rights that managers should not treat with negligence. Below are some examples: customers have the right to receive safe products that they purchase; lenders have the right to receive interests at a negotiated rate and principal at maturity; employees have the right to work in a safe environment and be treated with respect for their dignity and human rights; competitors have the right to be treated fairly without groundless slanders or violation of their intellectual properties. Some of stakeholders’ rights are stated clearly in different laws and regulations, which aim to protect stakeholders and reinforce a business entity’s accountability to its multiple constituencies. Also, stakeholders can earn some rights due to their initiative positions in market. For instance, given the lenders’ finite resources for lending, lenders enjoy the right to acquire further disclosure regarding borrowers’ business or other concerns because they can decide whether or not to lend money to a certain prospective borrower. Likewise, customers…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A promoter owes a fiduciary duty to the co which he is setting up. A fiduciary duty means that the person must act in the best interests of the co as a whole at all times. He is trusted to act in the interests of the co when he is carrying out the actions of a promoter.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article Reflection

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Director’s duties can be summarised into four duties: the duty of good faith, the duty to avoid conflict, the duty not to profit from the company and the duty not to misuse the company’s confidential information. In addition, any profits that the director comes into (by use of the company information, resources, or property) are deemed to be that of the company. Directors are given a position of authority and responsibility. They must adhere to the rules of their position and not misuse their power as a director.…

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays