Preview

Field Artillery In American History

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1376 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Field Artillery In American History
Since the foundation stages of American history, the American spirit has always waved its valiant attempts to not only remain free, but to the best. From the Civil War all the way to current operations in the Middle East, the Field Artillery has been a major component to the success of all and any major conflicts. Modern day Army calls artillery, “King of the Battle”. This has earned its dynamic name from the many conflicts in which Field Artillery lived to tell the tale. Many components to a war change from; tactics, logistics, concepts of operations, and even geographical considerations. Much like the change of modern war, the Field Artillery continues to adapt and overcome to its growing demand for change and development. One topic of discussion that will be discussed is the use of Field Artillery in World War 1. Other topics to be discussed are the facts of the War “as it pertains to Artillery”; the effects of the technological advances of the Artillery during the war, and lastly not just the aftermath of the war, but lessons learned moving forward from World War 1. Artillery moving into World War 1 would later shape the rest of the future on how future operations and conflicts would integrate the effective lethal fires of the Field Artillery. At the end of the War there was no question that the Field …show more content…

The initial use of Artillery was used to disable barbed wire defenses, damage trench lines, and destroy enemy gun emplacements. During the battle of Verdun each side used new Field Artillery methods of employment to achieve different effects. Modern Artillery doctrine and tactics evolved, in part from the lessons learned on both sides at the Battle at Verdun as a result. (Meloney,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lee, decided to make his way over to Richmond to lead the repel of the Union attack. General Lee, mustered up around 55,000 thousand ground troops and around 14 artillery batteries. Once Gen. Lee got to Malvern Hill, he surveyed the land for his main priority, artillery positions. Gen. Lee used fellow Confederate Gen. James Longstreet to compare observed land survey for artillery positions. They agreed two grand battery with additional other artillery pieces in support, positions would be place at the left and right sides of Malvern Hill, and conspired to weaken the Union frontal attack with artillery crossfire so that the exhausted Confederate attack would push back the Union forces. The Generals also would use the artillery fire as suppression to redraw forces if the main plan had no success, both plans were base off of artillery, not ground forces. The Union Army, commanded by Gen. McClellan, also survey Malvern hill, and was aided by Henry Hunt, a Union Chief Artillerist, who provided expert advice on current capabilities and deployment of the artillery systems in the current Union forces. With both armies using artillery as its base for both offenses, the army with the best artillery guns and plan, stand to win. The stage is set for a good old fashion artillery…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I read the diary entry “German Assault on Fort Vaux” written by an anonymous French soldier. The diary entry goes into detail about barrages and significant German casualties, with their “bodies piling up in heaps.” I try to put myself into a German soldier’s shoes, marching up to a well defended fort, with artillery exploding all around, I cannot even imagine how terrifying it would be. The soldier gives amazing descriptions of the artillery striking the fort, stating that “Tress would go up into the air like wisps of straw” and in regards to being on the receiving end of a barrage, he proclaims “These explosions stupefy the brain; you feel as if your entrails were being torn out, your heart twisted and wrenched; the shock seems to dismember your whole body.” Since these descriptions paint such a magnificent picture in the mind of the reader, I decided to further research the development and use of artillery during WW1.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you ever wonder what weapons were used in WW1? How about how they compare to todays standards? They affected their time period drastically in many ways. The German’s changed the game with tanks. They also brought chemical warfare into the war.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term “Sniper” originated from the British occupation of India in the 1800’s. It was the hunting of birds or big-game. While sniping was both a perceived military practice and hobby it had not been created as an expert arm of the warring multitudes of Europe in 1914. Once it became clear that sniping was ideally suited to the static conditions of trench warfare, its initial proponents in World War I tended to the drafting of capable civilians into the armed services. Sniping became important in the war, for the layout of the trenches gave snipers good chances to inflict material and moral loss upon the enemy.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet the effectiveness of the machine gun made up in a sense for the limited training. It dehumanized and the fact that 1300 rounds could be fired off within a minute it was more or less the act of pulling the trigger and not letting go towards the direction of the enemy. Since the French and the Germans were at a stalemate, they knew that the only way to protect themselves from the enemy was to dig, leading to trench warfare (Keegan, 258). The trench warfare became a game of sending men across no-man’s land in order to gain some leverage over the enemy. Conditions in the trenches was revolting with bodies of dead men and feces creating the perfect condition for disease, as well as trench foot caused by prolonged exposure of the feet to damp, unsanitary, and cold…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Tech

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During WWI there were many new guns that improved armies drastically. These new guns were one of the main killers in the war and accounted for many thousands of deaths. The first machine guns had first been used in the American Civil War (1861 to 1865) and the creator was Richard Gatling (Gatling gun). However, tactics from this war to 1914 had not changed to fit in with this new weapon. Machine guns could shoot hundreds of rounds of bullets a minute and the standard military tactic of World War One was the infantry charge. Casualties were huge. With the new guns such as German Maxim, Italian Fiat-Revelli, French Hotchkiss, Austro-Hungarian Schwartzlose, Russian Maxim and...Est. Many soldiers barely got out of their trench before they were cut down. At one scene British army were not sure about how can machine guns affect their strategy. Therefore most divisions had access to only two machine…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After my reading of Robert Ferrell’s America’s Deadliest Battle, I was capable of grasping an understanding of the American Expeditionary Force’s preparation for their battle against Germany in 1918, in addition to assessing the quality of some of the officers and men within the AEF, and some of the actions that displayed the weaknesses and strengths of the AEF as well. Additionally, I will be touching basis on other measures that gave the battle at the Meuse-Argonne its name as “America’s deadliest battle,” and discussing my overall opinion on America’s fighting ability in World War I.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why, after WWII, United States Artillery was presumed the best in the world. (http://99div.com, 2004) After receiving the massed fires, Germans attempted to conceive their version, but it eventually failed to function as they wanted. (http://99div.com,…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The overwhelming firepower, tactics, and maneuverability from the Field Artillery in the Battle of Palo Alto led to the defeat of the Mexican Army. Maj. Samuel Ringgold developed a carriage mounted 18 pounder siege cannon that was far superior to the Mexican Army’s heavy non-mobile guns (Sanchez, 2017). The Americans also used the 1841 6 pounders which weighed only 650 pounds and was extraordinarily easy to maneuver with oxen and horses ("Steel Cannons," n.d.). The 6 Pounder was also capable of firing three rounds a minute at 1500 feet per second with a maximum effective range of 1000 yards ("Military Factory," 2017). Nevertheless, these weapons were far superior to any of the small arms of time. Many of the small arms used took far too…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The current field of research into the cause of the downfall of the knightly class generally agrees that it was primarily a result of the introduction of gunpowder weaponry, but some recent scholarship suggests otherwise.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Artillery of the Potomac Army at Gettysburg, achieved victory through the “King of Battle” and integration of the Union maneuver commanders (Steve, 2014). Combat experience demonstrated seasoned leadership. The superiority of the Union artillery over their confederate counterparts was not only the number of guns employed, but also, it was the manner of how the Union commanders employed the artillery under their command (Steve, 2014). Proper integration of assets can determine the battlefield in moments. Hence, the concept of today’s utilization of artillery supporting the maneuver elements, has not drastically changed. (Steve, 2014)…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American Civil War is almost undoubtedly the most important event in the life of the nation. There are many reasons it is entitled to this account, mainly regarding to a better future for America, “a new birth of freedom”1. Through horrific measures, “It was the watershed of a new political and economic order, and the beginning of big industry, big business, big government… for Americans, the costliest, yielding the most American fatalities and the greatest domestic suffering, spiritually and physically. It was the most horrible, necessary, intimate, acrimonious, mean-spirited, and heroic conflict the nation has ever known.”2 However one of the several reasons that the war is so significant is that it was groundbreaking for all wars yet to come, globally. Many historians have regarded it as the world’s first modern war. A modern war it was with its widespread use of the most advanced mechanised and electrified devices of its time. Although on the contrary, a modern war it wasn’t with many uses of outdated, poorly planned and un-practiced tactics with modern equipment. Was the Civil War really the first modern war or could it be considered as experimental and a warning for military, universally, to employ and how to employ better tactics and training when using the worlds newest equipment?…

    • 2023 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The intellectual elements between 1861-1865 led the Civil War to be declared as the first modern war. These larger, modern armies used new emerging technologies of the Industrial Revolution (Keene, 387). The telegraph was one example of new technologies used during this time. It made instant communication more possible and easier to obtain across large stretches of territory. Railroads helped move supplies and reinforcements across many miles in less than a day. However, the thing that made this war “truly modern” was the advancements made in weaponry (Keene, 387). The artillery used by both armies was more deadly and accurate. Rifled muskets that had been improved could be used to kill a man “from a distance of 400 to 500 yards” (Keene, 387).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gulf War

    • 25749 Words
    • 103 Pages

    3. The influence of technology on warfare is not something new. It has occurred from time immemorial. For example, the use of iron enhanced striking power as well as improved protective means; stirrups on horses greatly improved mobility; the…

    • 25749 Words
    • 103 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    handwriting analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mortars, commonly termed as ‘poor man’s artillery’ are one of the most effective weapons at the disposal of an infantry commander. Though originally developed to suit the requirements of trench warfare, mortars are finding more and more usefulness in the ever changing, technology driven battle field of today. Much advancement is being carried out to not only improve mortars capability and effectiveness but also the new methods of deployment are being experimented.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics