Preview

Filibusters Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1806 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Filibusters Research Paper
| Filibusters | Keep them or get rid of them | | | |

Political Science 102 This paper is about if filibusters should be kept or not kept. I show all sides of the issues and show what I think is the best possible answer. |

\

Introduction
Every day in the United States laws are put onto the table to see if they will either be approved or disapproved. They go through quite a battle and if they are approved it shows they have reached the biggest goal there is for a law, being enforced. It takes a lot for everyone to pass and say ok to a new law.
The Research question I am going to discuss and give farther details on is if U.S. Senate should change its rules so that senators will no longer be allowed to filibuster. I will discuss and show all the different points and ideas on this story so everyone gets the idea of what will happen either way.
This is a very important research question because filibusters are very important. When a senator does not want a bill to go through to get voted on he or she will hold a filibuster to try to stop the process. Many of times the senator will do whatever it takes so a law cannot get passed even if this means talking about nothing that has to do with the bill. If they do not allow filibusters to happen anymore this could become quite interesting many bills may make it through in record time. I am not saying by not having filibusters means every bill will be passed I am just saying the process may speed up the process quite a bit because there will not be any road blocks. By not having filibusters it may also cause a stir in the public because they will support a certain candidate and tell them to cause a filibuster because the new law messing with an item they back.
Filibusters being around are a very important question because it affects our laws and the government. These two items do affect us daily even if we do not know it and it is important to understand if we do not have filibusters what it



Bibliography: * Alter Alison and Moscow Leslie. 2000. “Legislative Studies Quarterly” Vol. 25, No.259-284 * Chemerinsky Erwin and Fisk Catherine.1997. “The Filibuster.” Stanford Law Review Vol. 49, No. 2 181-254 * Kenneth, Janda, Jeffery M. Berry, and Goldman Jerry, The Challenge of Democracy, 10th edition, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 2009. * ”Senate Filibusters and the Cloture Rule.” Congressional Digest 90, no. 2 : 34-64. Academic Search Premier. * Hayes, Christopher. “Fix the Filibuster.” Nation 292, no 2/3 (January 10, 2011) : 4-7. Academic Search Premier

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    But on the other hand vetoes can be seen as extremely important as they are on of the key ways that the Congregational system of checks and balances is keep et in line as it allows the president to constitutional stop legislation passed by congress ,allowing for the for the checks and balances system while also allowing a second check and balances if congress get 2 thirds vote in both house creating a fair system .…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s no secrets that, as of late, Congress has been plagued by gridlock, unable to efficiently pass public policy -especially successful public policy. Congress’s gridlock stems from two key problems: Congress members fixation on getting re-elected and a lack of incentive for ‘getting things done.’ With these key problems in mind, the most effective changes to break gridlock in Congress would entail a two-pronged plan: One, we restructure how campaigns are paid for. And two, we base a large portion of Congress member’s benefit and salary off of their performance and the effectiveness of the legislation they pass.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equality in Filibusters

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Filibusters are a good way to show that that the United States adequately balances majority rule with minority rights. If the United Sates did not adequately balance minority rights and majority rule then it would run as smoothly as it has for this many years.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Senate Filibuster Tradition

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages

    With the continued threat of the use of the filibuster, the majority party needed to establish a method to end debate and get bills voted on. In 1917, the first change to the filibuster came when Senators adopted Senate Rule XXII, known as “cloture.” This rule allowed the Senate to end a debate with a two-thirds majority vote. The new Senate rule was first used in 1919 when cloture ended debate of a filibuster against the Treaty of Versailles (U.S. Senate). In 1975, the second change to this rule occurred when the number of required votes for cloture decreased from a two-thirds vote to three-fifths, or sixty votes (U.S.…

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Senate Filibuster Tactics

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The filibuster is a tactic that is needed in the Senate and actually helps the Senators in the long run. “For example, the filibuster is an essential element in moderating the extremes of our competitive party system” (pg. 171). The filibuster is viewed as crucial to the Senate, because it makes the competitive party system we have become less extreme. A senator being able to delay his or her vote, it gives them more time to think about who they want to vote on because of the fact there are so many individuals who apply for the exact same position. Senators do not just want to give their votes to any random person, they want to make it count. It has even been said the filibuster process helps smooth out “worst abuses of this special interest participation” (pg. 171). Meaning this process does not allow the “Majority Rule” to be used in order to make a decision. Although there is a certain amount needed in order to filibuster something, it gives them the opportunity to be heard if they do not agree with what is brought to the…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term filibuster, only applies to the Senate. A filibuster does not apply to the House of Representative for the fact of the growing numbers of members within that house that will vary from time to time. The House of Representative also have different rules from the Senate regarding the time a debate can prolong (United States Senate). When a filibuster takes…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress Paper

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This Senate simulation will place students in the role of a senator. The main goal of this simulation is to pass various bills and get the President to sign them into law. The process in which a bill becomes a law is complex. Partisanship and clashing ideologies and egos do not make the process smooth. We will try to examine the most vital aspects of the process. This Senate Simulation will be divided into 5 parts:…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitutional theory provides that conservatively presidents aren’t full accustomed or adept to use their constitutional power to veto and not using the arguably most formidable remedy against Congress may prove costly (Kernell et al. 2014, p. 325). The consequence is of not maximizing the power to veto is allowing Congress to be less considerate of the president while making decisions (Kernell et al. 2014, p. 326). As it shows that number of average vetoes per year has fluctuated in the past century but on definite decline in past three decades (Kernell et al. 2014, p. 326). The general negative linear correlation in the number of vetoes help explain that the inadequate use of constitutional power, is a limiter the Congress has on the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effects Of Obstructionism

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An obstructionist policy breaks the delicate nature of legislation itself, causing individuals to become disillusioned with the opposition party. President of the Florida Democratic Party Sally Boynton Brown reflects that “all those different checks and balances and why it takes so many steps for a law to become a law” are essential “to get to a place of compromise” (1-2). That the rule of law is necessary to ensure good legislation and discourse is contrary to how many individuals now see the function of government, which is constant gridlock. In frustration, they blame the opposition. Furthermore, Caplan of the New Yorker notes that some aspects of government are purposely not intended to be political, rather that “the Supreme Court is supposed to serve as the corrector and protector of the political branches” instead of being a political force itself (2). Playing partisan politics, especially with the Supreme Court, only drags an issue that should not be partisan into the political sphere, escalates partisanship, and slows down the ability of government to…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Congress, reconciliation is a “controversial procedural device”, requiring a simple majority with the trade-off that the 'bill' must be only budget-related provisions (Lightman, David). Moreover, the device is “hardly uncommon”, with a successful use of reconciliation only 19 times and vetoed three times; the reconciliation could be delayed with “quorum calls”, which means that “51 senators would have to be present for business to continue” (Lightman, David). However, reconciliation bills risk partisan dissatisfaction, if not disgust, as in essence, it is being jammed through in a ”viciously partisan manner” (Gregg, Judd). Furthermore, reconciliation bills proposed in a party-line vote – substantial majority of members of a political party vote the same way – may be vetoed by the President and an override may fail (Gregg, Judd); in brief, reconciliation is not tremendous factor against the passage of law, especially when lacking bipartisan support, as when overplayed, the Wall Street Journal describes the strategy as a “game of Russian roulette with all the chambers loaded” (Gregg, Judd).…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stare Decisis

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Fallon, Richard H. The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press, 2004.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bicameral Motivations

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Fisk, David. "Superflous or Mischevious? Evaluating the Determinants of Government Defeats in Second Chamber." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2011: n/a.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reading Report Sample

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Detailed analysis of the votes, concession making, and negotiation that occurred in the Senate's passing of the government's 1993 Budget is provided by the author as empirical backing for the arguments developed and claims made throughout the article. The author uses the aims of minor parties, the voting and negotiation process, and resulting changes to specific clauses of the budget to examine the behaviour, activism and effect of minor parties in the Senate.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Filibustering in HK

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gregory Koger, “A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate”, 2010. Printed. July 22, 2014…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Article6

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * It is not underestimating the way where the House of Representatives pass some laws. But, it wouldn’t hurt if there could be another House to check some hurried and not carefully considered laws. Moreover, the laws that are going to be passed will be proofread properly and carefully considered.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays