Preview

Film Analysis: The House I Live In

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Film Analysis: The House I Live In
The war on drugs is one of the longest, seemingly non-progressive issues the US has ever faced. The fact that the government has been prolonging the end of this war, is an issue in itself. The documentary The House I Live In, directed by Eugene Jarecki in 2012, is an informative and important film for the advancement of the war on drugs. In the film, the complete history of the war on drugs is picked apart and essentially, it is determined and expressed that the war on drugs is a counterproductive stint to maximize the wealth and the image of the government. The film is eye-opening, in that it also explains the degree of classism and racism which has provided the basic ideas behind the war on drugs.
The government is, and has always been,
…show more content…
A popular idea which many people use to object drug use, is utilitarianism. In utilitarianism, the main goal is to maximize the welfare of the composite, meaning the balance of benefits and harms should be equal, and the harms should never outweigh the benefits. If a utilitarian were to speak about drugs, they might argue that drugs should not be legal or used, because the harms outweigh the benefits (Sencerz, 2011). Their argument might be considered valid, but it cannot be concluded that it is sound. The premise for the conclusion, cannot be deemed for all instances, but it is reasonable to say that the conclusion lines up with the premises. This seems to be a reasonable way to view drugs, however, it fails to take into account that the government is doing more harm than drugs are. Given the issues with soundness, this utilitarian argument against drug use, should not be used to object it. If the government were to provide more rehabilitation and ways, or programs, for people to utilize in ceasing drug use and trade, it is probable that drug use, crime, trade, and disease related to drug use, will decrease. The government does provide rehabilitation and programs; however, the problem is that said programs and rehabilitations centers, are the first to be cut when budgets are low and they are not abundant (The House I Live In, 2012). There …show more content…
The House I Live In, is a powerful and effective documentary, which successfully uncovers the history and hidden information on the war on drugs. Recently, there have been small progressions, but, if the government wants to see drastic positive change in the use and trade of drugs, there is still a great deal of work to be done. They say history repeats itself. If the war on drugs is not regulated, we may see some detrimental events. Some, maybe even like ones we have seen

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this chapter we also learn that The War on Drugs is more than a simple pronouncement; it is a complex system with multiple rules and regulations. It was authorized by the federal government, protected by the court system, and is executed by local law enforcement agencies. Hundreds of thousands of people are arrested every year for drug offenses, many through specially designed police tactics.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The phrase “sex, drugs, and rock and roll” held true to its well-earned spot in 1970’s and 1980’s society. With a new, looser culture, explicit music, raunchy and rambunctious movies as well as a societal focus on many things immoral, it was an era of challenging social norms. As the use of recreational and psychoactive drugs, as well as alcohol, increased, a new problem arose; how does law enforcement and the government undo the damage being made by this new society? Laws were passed, bureaus and commissions were formed, and the President of the United States began what he called “The War on Drugs”. Over the years, some of these solutions have proven to make some impact. The initiation, tactics, and attempts at dealing a major blow to drug abuse have all affected the way America sees drugs today. A new type of warfare had made its way into the country, and after all these years, it has made its fair share of positive and negative effects.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walters brings up arguments from both a favoring side and an opposing side. Favoring sides would not want to give someone government benefits if they are using the benefits to support a drug habit and could save the government money by denying applicants. The opposing side feels that drug testing would come to a great expense to the government and rather than drug testing an individual who needs help because of their drug addiction other programs such as rehab would save money to local, state and federal governments. The author feels that both are good arguments.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Jim Crow Thesis

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rest of the book entails the effects of the War on Drugs. I found it particularly interesting how the justice system/police have sought different ways to take people to jail based on hunches on drugs or using minor traffic violations as an excuse to stop motorists for drug investigations- even when there is no profound evidence that the motorist has engaged in a drug crime. Also, it was interesting to read how the Supreme Court (whose responsibility is to protect minorities from majoritarian democracy) has placed somewhat of an infringement on minorities fourth amendment…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition In The 1920's

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This online article talks about the similarities between the prohibition and the War on Drugs. It offers theories about why the war on drugs continues to be waged and states that it is primarily due to the stubbornness of the United States government. They bring up the fact that many high profile individuals and politicians have used illegal drugs yet they still support the war. They also bring up the financial burden that came along with prohibition and point out that the same burden is being placed on us nearly 80 years later yet…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s society is known as the “Era of Color Blindness.” The war on drugs from the past to the future has not changed according to Michelle Alexander. The previous Jim Crowe law may be eradicated, but the law was brought back into effect by former president Ronald Reagan, known as the “War on Drugs.” The war on drugs that was put into effect by Ronald Reagan was targeted to lower class communities that had a violent crime rate. Focusing on the “Drug War” took light off a pressing issue known as racial caste in America by making harsher punishments for people who used or sold drugs. Even though the focus was in lower class communities it was also just as common in the middle to upper class communities. The “War on Drugs”…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War on Drugs was proclaimed by the Nixon Administration in the signing of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. It evoked the current era of mandatory minimum sentencing, systematic racism, and mass incarceration of colored people. While the War on Drugs has certainly sought to eradicate controlled substances and destroy the networks established for their distribution, State efforts to control drugs are also a way for dominant groups to express racial power. Despite the socioeconomic factors that contribute to drug use, it is evident that drug legislation is inherently biased and fuels racially motivated mass incarceration.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history associated with drug criminalization in America contains more political motivators than concerns for public health and safety. The biggest politically motivated aspect to drug deterrence comes from Richard Nixon’s s war on drugs in 1971 which has created a system that discriminates against minority groups and has had little effect on deterring drug use. The war on drugs has thus far been notoriously noted for discriminating against people of color by pumping drugs into their communities and then imposing severe criminal consequences for drug possession, use, or distribution. In fact, one of Nixon’s aides John Ehrlichmen stated that the war on drugs was intended for the following:…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An Unfair Drug War

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Politically, the issue of drugs is extremely significant. The War on Drugs has been a long and expensive fight to decrease the usage and sales of drugs. Although politics have struggled to end the large usage, it seems as if the war is a waste of time. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being poured into this Drug War and it seems to be very ineffective.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schaffer, C.A. (n.d.) Basic Facts About the War on Drugs. Retrieved on April 22, 2006 from:…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet people in law enforcement and local communities are not convinced for good reasons. Although casual illegal drugs use appears to fluctuate and may have declined in recent years, the regular usage of these drugs has not. The government warning about how dangerous these are, such as; heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine only confuse matter further. Actually, such warning are an indication that these drugs are unwinnable. Production sources , smuggling techniques, purity price and use patterns have changed through the years in dynamic drugs markets as governments has made claims of progress, but the war on drugs that began in 1914 has no end in…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The war on drugs in the United States is an expensive and deadly ongoing battle that has not yet been won. The term war on drugs provides drug distributors with more income due to the illegal nature of drugs. Americans do not have readily available easy access to many types of drugs that are illegal. Because narcotics are illegal that is enough for many people to want drugs. This is a major problem faced today in our prison systems throughout the United States. Especially in the state of California where many people find their way into our criminal justice system due to many factors…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays