REL 215
Professor E. Ranstrom Ph.D.
13 September 2014
Reflection Paper: Lewis and Freud
Dr. Armand Nicholi in the documentary: C. S. Lewis: The Four Loves Stated, “for Lewis, true happiness could only be found in relationship with God.” (p.1) The Love that Lewis sought after could only come from God. In my humble opinion, that’s where the difference begins and ends. On the other hand Freud – the founder of psychoanalysis and an atheist could only produce the kind of love that was reciprocal. I believe that they were tied to their views on religion by their understanding of what love was to them. Lewis once believed or at least had to some degree thought like Freud. As I relate “Religion: Why Bother” I couldn’t help but think about “The Watch Out” Attitude: Religion Is Dangerous stated “Religion is both psychologically and sociologically dangerous.”
Freud and Lewis’s perspectives on love differ because Lewis focuses on God while Freud focuses on self. One on hand, Lewis’s explains that Gods love in man enables him to love unconditionally. For an example, Lewis believed the divine gift love in a man enables him to love what is not naturally lovable – lepers, criminals, enemies and morons. On the other hand, Freud believes on the gratification of self because a man’s beliefs and behavior stem from his own childhood fears and desires. Moreover, Freud and Lewis perspectives on love are tied together because they focus on the affection for family, friends and sexual love; however, Lewis added a fourth category – love of God. Lewis’s response to Freud’s critique on religion is that love does not have an ulterior motive. In my opinion, the viewpoints within “Religion: Why Bother” are self- centered rather than selfless because there has to more than Freud’s type of love; therefore, most circumstances do not revolve around oneself. Because God Is love. Lewis’s perspective on love is more convincing than Freud’s for the reason that Lewis acknowledged that to believe in God and to pray, were the beginning of his extroversion. The light came on, He had been taken out of himself.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Lewis was a British writer who lived during the early 20th century. Lewis was originally an atheist who set out disprove Christianity. He quickly learned that Christianity and the story of Jesus were true, so he became a Christian author in order to spread the gospel of Jesus. Lewis was an extremely influential man; his articles had a massive impact worldwide. As previously stated, The Great Divorce is a tremendous rebuttal of the book, Marriage of Heaven and Hell. Throughout the book, Lewis makes it crystal clear that Heaven and Hell are not one and the same. Since the book is written in the form of a story, it is ideal for the less educated reader to understand and appreciate. Even though on a fundamental level it is a story, as the book is unwrapped and examined, many theological concepts are found. These abstruse concepts attract and sustain the attention of the well-educated reader. Lewis does a fantastic job at capturing the attention of a wide range of audiences. Another brilliant aspect of the book is Lewis’ word choice and use of imagery. Through entirety of the book, Lewis guides the reader on a journey of the landscape with the use of his words and imagery. Whether it be in the grey town, the entrance of heaven, or the ever-distant mountains, the reader can almost physically grasp the landscape detailed in the book, thanks to Lewis. One of the negative aspects of the book was the lack of theological originality. Lewis did not present any new theological concepts or even any new opinions on any theological concepts in the book. He only gathered information and put it into story form. Had he added some new ideas, it would have greatly increased the quality of the…
- 1644 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
As human beings, we tend to have a great deal of trouble interpreting our own selves. Within Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis provides me with useful insight to help me understand my own personal life. Furthermore, throughout the course of my life I have wrestled with the idea of an absolute right versus an absolute wrong. Lewis points out within our own mental state we have our own way of portraying morality in reference to…
- 930 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
obvious conflict between the irreligious tenets of Freudianism (of which he is a great admirer) and his…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The Four Loves, authored by British novelist C.S. Lewis, is often viewed as one of the best books written on the subject of love as it pertains to religion. In the book, Lewis covers many ideas including the four types of love which include: storgé (empathetic love/affection), philia love (the love between friends), Eros (erotic/romantic love), and Agapé (the unconditional ‘God’ love). In this book, Lewis also covers the differences between need and gift love; however, one of the most astounding statements that Lewis makes is in the storgé passage, specifically in the section about affection where he states, “Affection is responsible for nine-tenths of whatever solid and durable happiness there is in our natural lives.” (pg. 53). Lewis also states, "The highest does not stand without the lowest. (pg.9) If affection is part of storgé, which is considered the lowest love, then to obtain the higher loves one must have affection. Furthermore, storgé (commonly referred to as affection) creates stamina in natural relations between people due precisely to that low-level nature it…
- 762 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Lewis begins to understand God, and his grief a little better. He starts to realize that his own mind and ways are flawed not God’s. Lewis comes to the conclusion that, “If there is a good God, then these tortures are necessary. For no even moderately good Being could possibly inflict or permit them if they weren’t”. If God is not good, then God does not exist. For any torture that occurs, occurs for the betterment of God’s children. Without these tortures we could not experience his wholesome love. If the tortures mean nothing, then there must be no God at all. The gracious God that we have, would not inflict pain on us with no reason behind it. I have to believe, if I believe in God, that there is a reason behind all of this. If it is all meaningless then there can be no God, because that would defeat the very purpose of God. We can never experience the love that God has for us in full, until we have experienced suffering in our own lives. It is the suffering that makes His love so…
- 1354 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Freud places emphasis on the power of the individual versus the power of civilization as a whole in his book Civilization and Its Discontents, an emphasis that is clearly replicated in both 1984 and Panopticon. Freud states, “Human life in common is only made possible when a majority comes together which is stronger than any separate individual and which remains united against all separate individuals” (46). This particular sentiment is echoed in the theory of the panopticon as tool to suppress the imprisoned individual, illustrated through the guard tower placed in the center of the prison that does not allow for inmates to decipher whether there is anyone inside watching them; an illusion that is intended to demonstrate the power of the panopticon…
- 460 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The use of the conception of how religion correlates with the human mind is very well talked about outside of the article. Besides the author’s article, the discussion over how religion impacts the human mind is looked more in depth in Fraser Watts’s abstraction of “Self-Conscious Emotions, Religion and Theology.” For instance, Watts makes a claim that, “Self-conscious emotions such as guilt and shame also provide a vantage point for approaching soteriology” (p 1). Indulging in negative emotions can also follow up with a closer understanding about religion…
- 681 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
IV. Lewis expounds on the Christian dogma and answers some of man’s questions about God. (47-59)…
- 930 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though Screwtape’s distorted views on God’s love, Lewis implies that God is “Love” that He loves people for their sake, not His, and that His love challenges people to become generous in their love. Wormwood’s “patient” is drifting dangerously deeper into Christian belief, and Screwtape advises his protege to forsake fleshly temptations and try to corrupt his spirituality. He mentions that the various interpretations of Jesus that exist in society are devilish inventions. The advantages of these constructions, which we intend to change every thirty years or so, are manifold. In the first place they all tend to direct men’s devotion to something which does not exist, for each “historical Jesus” is unhistorical. The documents say what they say and cannot be added to; each new “historical Jesus” therefore has to be got out of them by suppression at one point and exaggeration at another.…
- 1155 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…
- 1122 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To Freud, the mind was a mechanistic energy system that derived mental energy from the physical functioning of the body and constantly attempted to moderate this physical effort or tension by restoring it to a quiet steady (quiescent) state. This energy is not evenly distributed to all human purpose or functioning, and if blocked from expression will manifest itself as anxiety, which through cathartic release, prescribes a least resistant path of action. Because anxiety is painful, the mind attempts to cope with this state through a range of defence mechanisms that alter reality and supress feelings that stimulate this state. The mind and its energies (derived from drives or…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When the human brain decides to repress a memory, it pushes it down so deep into the core of our hippocampus in order to protect us from ever recalling it. This unconscious process acts as a defense mechanism that helps us avoid any mental or emotional stress or scarring from any painful, horrific, traumatic experiences that we have been through in our past. Sigmund Freud was a neurologist who is famously known for his many studies and theories on psychoanalysis of the human brain and its nature in the 20th century. He was born in Freiberg, Austria on the 6th of May 1856, though at the age of 4 years, he moved with his family to Vienna where he settled and began his education. In 1983 after graduating from the University of Vienna with a medical…
- 258 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Clive Staples Lewis, or C.S Lewis, was a well known novelist and Christian Apologist. However, he it was only in his later life that he argued for the existence of God. He andured many hardships in his childhood. With his mother’s passing, influence of the boarding school he attended, along with other life situations caused Lewis to reject Christianity and become an avowed atheist. But today he is best known as an apologist, probably the most successful Christian apologist of the twentieth century. Lewis forms his apologetic argument for Christianity with three stages. First, he set out to establish the existence of God on grounds that are philosophical. Then he sought to show how God has revealed himself in Christ and in the Christian religion. Finally, he defends theism and Christianity against common objections, such as the problem of evil. But, his own favorite proofs are those from morality, from reason, and from desire.…
- 1101 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
139-140. Freud's argument was that "the command to love the neighbor as ourselves is the strongest defense there is against human aggressiveness and it is a superlative example of the un-psychological attitude of the cultural superego. The command is impossible to fulfill; such an enormous inflation of the ego can only lower its value and not remedy its evil." I think it is important to note that while Freud states that the commandment is downright unattainable for a culture, I do believe that certain individuals posses what is necessary to show an agape love. Yet while it is possible, very few people in the course of history have been able to develop this kind of love for mankind. But to this argument, Niebuhr states that "the faith which regards the love commandment as a simple possibility rather than an impossible possibility is rooted in a faulty analysis of human nature which fails to understand that though man always stands under infinite possibilities and is potentially related to the totality of existence, he is, nonetheless, and will remain, a creature of finiteness" (Christian Ethics 246). He goes on to state that man "will never be able to divorce his reason from its organic relation with the natural impulse of survival with which nature has endowed him; and he will never be able to escape the sin of accentuating his natural will-to-live into an imperial will-to-power by the very protest which he yearning for the eternal tempts him to make against his finiteness" (Christian Ethics…
- 1332 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Lewis’s controversial argument in his essay We have no “Right To Happiness” he begins by bringing up a quote by a character named Clare who says, “After all, they had a right to happiness.” He then proceeds to describe a situation in which a husband abandons his wife in exchange for another women. The events that unfold involve his ex-wife committing suicide after devoting and consuming herself to her earlier married life. The man justifies his decision and shies away from feeling any guilt by, in C.S Lewis’s eyes, a pathetic excuse which goes, “But what could I do?” he said. “A man had a right to happiness. I had to take my one chance when it came.” Basically what happened is his pursuit of happiness had the ripple effect of being the reason…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays