“Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…
Another concern about selling organs is that the poor will not be able to buy organs, its going to become like e bay market where people bid and the poor will not have a chance and therefor die.…
“Each day, an average of 79 people receive organ transplants. However, an average of 21 people die each day waiting for transplants that can't take place because of the shortage of donated organs” (The Need Is Real). There are many different views of the pros and cons that make up transplants of all kinds, from organ to bone transplants, and whether or not they should be allowed to be continued.…
Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…
In Alexander T. Tabarrok’s essay, “A Moral Solution to the Organ Shortage” Alexander explains ways to find solutions to the organ shortage by proposing a fair way to go about qualifying for organ transplant. Gary Becker suggested that paying a good amount of money toward funeral cost of organ donors would help and encourage people to donate their organs. The new rule that Alexander wanted to proposed is the “no -give - no - take” rule. Under this rule in order to receive an organ a person must have previously signed their organ donor card. Under “no - give - no take”, signing your organ donor card is like joining the club, the club of people who have agreed to share their organs. People have different views when it comes to donating organs. Some have their doubts about becoming an organ donor because of their religious beliefs, while others thinks that by signing an organ donor card it’s same as buying an insurance . NOTE In some ways I agree with Alexander on this new rule that he has proposed ( UNOS). Having a donor card is a good idea to make sure there is surplus of organs able to be donated. I’m not convinced that the “no- give no - take” rule will be productive to solve the shortage of our organ donors any time soon, since Alexander’s essay was based on suggestion. As for myself I would have doubt of donating my organs not because of my religion or beliefs, but the trust of the people that handling my organs. This essay has inspired me to rethink being an organ donor because of the problems of most organizations. In my own views, paying tremendous amounts of money to organ donors to saved someones life is a wrong way to help people that in need. As time progresses and suggestions becomes reality I would be more confident in donating my organs. NOTE…
I agree that this will be of some help to resolve the crisis. Countries are trying to resolve this shortage issue by implementing and revising their health systems. Some possible solutions include encouraging donors by implementing educational programs for the public and staff regarding the needs and benefits of organ donation. If the donors are aware of how helpful donating an organ is, the donor might trust the system of organ donation. If donors are able to empathize pervious patients’ stories, it could open their minds and produce a higher chance of willingness for organ donation (Hellmich, 2013). “Even a regulated system of organ sales will not prevent the inevitable back-door organ auction.” Despite the back-door option being unfair, I would have to disagree at some point. Indeed some will break and source for this option in order to gain profits to live a better life or for buyers who are sourcing for an organ donor. However, there is no blaming them as they might have been desperate for help. People die each day due to the lack or organ donors. If a person sells or donates their organ, even the tissue could help save a life (Beshears, 2013). Another disagreement that can be seen in Bramstedt’s argument is the priority wait-list. Indeed the wait-list will make a difference and help on who the organ should go to but she did not elaborate on what the list of…
According to the website, Donate Life America, more than 100,000 men, women, and children currently need life-saving organ transplants. In 2009, there were only 8,021 deceased organ donors, and 6,610 living donors resulting in 28,465 organ transplants. This massive shortage in organ donors brings about a crisis among many waiting for an organ. While the process is still illegal in the United States, black markets have made organ donations profitable to those who are willing to donate while giving the wealthy an advantage over individuals with less monetary resources. However, other countries such as Canada, France and The United Kingdom, have introduced reimbursement programs that pay out of pocket expenses for the live donor. These expenses can include: lost wages, travel expenses, lodging, and meals. While 90% of Americans say they support donations, only 30% know the essential steps to take to become a donor. This has made finding new avenues of educating and luring live donors essential. Live donors are able to donate: a single kidney, portions of the liver, lobes of the lungs, and portions of the pancreas. Should the United States initiate a reimbursed organ donation program, while introducing government regulation and funding; it would increase the quantity of live tissue donors, making organ donations more accessible to all populations who desperately need them.…
As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…
Fairness is a great solution to this epidemic. By fairness, I mean whoever doesn’t donate won’t be a priority when it comes to the waiting list. People will be forced to give up a piece or whole organ to become a higher priority patient in the future. If one doesn’t then it is considered organ free-riding, a morally wrong action to do. This is a term stated by Steinberg, one of the critics against this current U.S. organ policy. Steinberg believes that everyone should do what they would others to do when they are in the same situation. He states,…
Currently, the United States is facing a crisis. On average, 20 people are dying every day because there is a shortage of organs. Right now, to receive an organ, one must wait for an organ donor to die, or receive an organ from someone who is willing to give up one of theirs. With technology and medical advances, organ transplants are becoming more successful, effective, and safe. For those reasons, many people would be willing to sell an organ to a complete stranger. But right now, it is illegal for someone to sell their organs. In turn, this has created a black market for organs, and from this, it has caused chaos in some countries. There needs to be a legal market for organs because it will actually help the economy,…
What is the incentive for people to donate? Many believe that if the buying and selling of organs becomes legal, that this would be a unique way of not only saving thousands of lives every year, but also allowing many people to be pulled out of poverty and live a life where one’s family is provided for (Shafer and Cunningham, 2011).…
If altruism were sufficiently powerful, the supply of organs would be large enough to satisfy the demand, and there would be no need to change the present system. But this is not the case in any country that does a significant number of transplants. While the per capita number of organs donated has grown over time, demand has grown even faster. As a result, the length of the queue for organ transplants has grown significantly over time in most countries, despite exhortations and other attempts to encourage greater giving of organs.…
There is a controversy in today's society that organ donation only benefits the wealthy people, but without organ donation not even the poor will have hope for the chance of life. Most people live their lives not knowing the importance of organ donation until they are faced with this dilemma. Healthcare is experiencing a shortage in organ donation and the people that need these organs is only growing (Meckler, 2007). As people with good ethical morals, people are obligated to take part in organ donation because people are in need of organs and tissues, donors give a gift of life, and donors are the ones that minimize the need of organs and tissues in the U.S.…
Imagine you are in the hospital and that you have been placed on life support because you are in need of a new kidney, heart, or liver. Would you be put on the national transplant list, hoping to get the life sustaining organ you need, or would you go look for someone willing the sell the organ you are in need of? People donate their bodies to science every day so that students can dissect them and hopefully learn something. There is also approximately 18 people who die every single day while waiting for an organ transplant (www.inpublicsafety.com, 2014). In 2014 there were over 100,000 names on the national transplant list. Each month another 2,000 names are added to this list (www.inpublicsafety.com, 2014). It would be very difficult to watch someone you love die because a match for organ donation could not be found. It would be even harder to watch that same loved one die because they purchased an organ off the black-market. Organ sales are dangerous and unethical due to the selling of diseased organs, high cost of the organ, and unsanitary conditions.…
Giving an organ to a person may require additional incentives. Maybe what the government should do is provide a payment option to those who are candidates. This way, more people would come forward to provide donations. This could be similar to where a male or female donates his or her fertility methods, where the donors receive money to assist a family in need. Another idea could be free healthcare for life to the person who donated the organ. This way, the donor would not have to worry about the added expenses for health costs.…