Preview

Finding a Middle Ground: How the Ends Justify the Means

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
853 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Finding a Middle Ground: How the Ends Justify the Means
Katie Decker
English Composition 1
11 February 2013
Finding a Middle Ground:
How the Ends Justify the Means Everyone has goals. Some people believe in order to attain a certain goal that it is acceptable to do things that are immoral. This may cause one to wonder if the actions taken to reach such a goal will be worth it. I am going to discuss some different situations that may or may not have a worthy ending, including any means it might take to reach goals such as gaining power, maintaining authority and gaining a title. I’ll also go over what some of the difficulties are in using tactics that may be categorized as unfair or even bad. Are immoral actions ever an acceptable way to achieve a goal? Machiavelli insists that it is not only acceptable, but a necessary means of gaining and maintaining power if that were the goal one wished to achieve. I do believe, however, that doing so may prove to be more difficult than imagined. I say this because anyone who is trying to create or keep an image would want to appear moral even through actions that when looked at separately may not seem so. One cannot, in my opinion, be greedy while simultaneously appearing generous. There must be a middle ground; a place that is at either one absolute or the other, but rather a balance of the two extremes.[1] For example, Machiavelli states “With time he will come to be considered more generous once it is evident that, as a result of his parsimony, his income is sufficient” (43). Therefore, one may seem generous without actually giving up anything, as long as nothing is being taken. There is no need to give up all to be generous. Nor is there a need to take all from others to maintain wealth. Is the perception of being cruel to be preferred over that of being merciful? Yes, with cruelty comes fear of consequences. Those who are afraid of repercussions are less likely to rebel. Just like Scipio, who was overthrown in Spain just because he showed too much



Cited: Machiavelli, Niccolo. “The Qualities of the Prince.” World of Ideas Boston, Bedford/St.Martin’s 2010 ----------------------- [1] Definition: Middle Ground [2] Hypothetical Example

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth351 Final Exam

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    FINAL EXAM ****NOTE: THIS WAS A CLASS TAKEN ON CAMPUS - MAY NOT BE USED FOR ALL ETHICS COURSES***…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that there are some that need a harsh punishment to learn their lesson. Others need to be shown justice and mercy. Hammurabi’s Code provided a little bit of both almost 4,000 years ago. It was 1792 B.C.E, when Hammurabi rose to power as the ruler of Babylon. After ruling for 30 years, he created a set of laws. These laws were called the “Hammurabi’s Code”. He created this code with 282 laws because he was concerned about keeping order in his kingdom. They were carved on a stele made black diorite and placed three of them around his kingdom. Hammurabi's code has been called the first set of laws. But were these laws just and fair or were they too harsh? Looking at the three sets of laws; family law, injury law and property law we see that Hammurabi's code was a just and fair set of laws for the most part although there were many extreme laws that were very violent and could be considered harsh, severe and unjust. In the United States our Constitution forbids such cruel and unusual punishment. Hammurabi will be remembered as a smart and organized ruler who was the first one to establish a set of laws for a civilization.…

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Abolition of Man, C. S. Lewis tries to persuade people about the importance of universal values such as courage and honor in a modern society. Lewis discusses several issues that I can apply to business or legal issues, such as listening to my heart, staying within the Tao, and using power respectfully.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this discussion we were suppose to side with either the Conservative side or the Moderate side. The Conservative side had points about the welfare which best described my opinion about welfare. One the other hand the moderate view also had several points to the welfare reform.…

    • 686 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone in life yearns to be successful however, some people end up more so than others. This is due to the fact that if someone’s goal is unreasonably large then they might take drastic and, unmoral measures to achieve their goals of glory and power. Proven by their rise to power, characters who seek glory are doomed to fail, even when they, in the end, recognize their flaw…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dirty Harry Problem

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "When and to what extent does the morally good end warrant or justify an ethically, politically, or legally dangerous means for its achievement?" This is the question posed by Carl Klockars about the ever growing Dirty Harry problem in society. This has become a focus of mass media and even a source of profit. The name itself comes from a Hollywood movie staring Clint Eastwood. Well if you believe the movies then the answer is never, for along as the bad guy gets what he deserves than the means didn't matter. But at some point doesn't a line have to be drawn?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, execrable acts of corrupt human behavior have stunned mankind. While one might not see themselves capable of committing acts of torture towards others, and possibly killing another human being, experiments and real historical events have proven that there is a gruesome side within human beings expressed when placed in a position of power or control. Those who are not in that position expect those who are to act with a moral conscience, but it is easier said than done. The Abu Ghraib scandal and Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment demonstrate the powerful role that a situation can play in altering human behavior.…

    • 3039 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings must never be treated simply as "means" to the accomplishment of some defined "end." The end does not justify the means. The author finds this to be an accurate reading of his ethic views.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics in Criminal Justice

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Theodore Roosevelt, “in any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing and the worst thing you can do is nothing”. To be immoral, it is not adhering to ethical or moral principles (what you believe is right). When something is declared unethical, it is against the standards of social or professional behavior. There are many times when it is acceptable to act in an immoral or an unethical way. I agree according to Theodore Roosevelt’s quote.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justify the Means

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does “The end Justify the means”. In the movie, Mississippi Burning, the end justifies the means in a way because when you think about it most of the time there are certain limitations to getting what you want. In the movie the only way to get the Ku Klux Klan to confess and give each other to the police was to trick them and make them think that the Ku Klux Klan was after them. In other occasions around the world at the time it was not always necessary to hurt or kill people just to get what you want. Even though it was not necessary people still did it even though they did not have to (they wanted to). In the Mississippi burning the white people might have thought they had a right to hurt/kill Negro people just because they were scared of them and thought they were better then them. That is still no good reason. Proof of the white people hurt the Negroes and damaging their land, crops, and livestock is at the beginning of the movie as the credits where going across the screen there was a Negro church burning in the background. Throughout the movie we see that the “White Knights” are burning down Negro’s homes and barns along with the livestock inside them. All this evidence shows the brutality in Mississippi at that time. There was no reason to kill the three young activists. Especially not the reason that the Ku Klux Klan had (one man was a Negro). Even though the Ku Klux Klan did not have a good reason to do what they did the Federal Bureau of Investigation should still not have done what they did. The end was right but the means were wrong. The Federal Bureau of Investigation should have done what they had been doing but they should have tried a little harder to find someone that would speak to them so they could get the rest of the names. They could have also done what they did and get the weakest link to tell just by interrogation rather than what they had did and scared him and his family so bad the he would do anything…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As society toils onward into its dreams of the future, the progress that accompanies this movement may be tainted by individual motives of avarice. However, as seen in various fields such as art, history, and science, the human conscience will limit the motivation of greed and inspire good works for the sake of morality. One’s sense of right and wrong forever impels one to be a decent, thoughtful person.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do the ends justify the means, or is a virtuous action virtuous in and of itself?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history the balance between honor and ambition has been tilted in one way or another. Someone’s ambition can get in the way of their honor and result in dishonorable actions and negative societal consequences. However sometimes a dishonorable act can be done for honorable reasons, for the greater good of society. This is the case in Marcus Brutus taking part in Julius Caesar’s murder, Oskar Schindler deceiving the Nazi, and Sir Nicholas Winton forging legal documents…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as competitiveness, fast response, decisiveness, driving through barriers, or goal achievement, could be highlighted in the lower right…

    • 1103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays