Free speech is a fundamental value for a democratic society. In the article “ Free Speech: Westboro Church Supreme Court Case Tests First Amendment” from Christian Science Monitor (October 2, 2010), author Warren Richey discusses about the first amendment right and free speech implications in some court cases. The author mentions veriest leaders of large cults that propagate hateful speeches. He acknowledges cases like burning the American flag, a Nazi parade in the Jewish community , hurtful demonstrations against gay rights and tension between religions. I believe U.S. Government should not censor offensive speech because it gives us the freedom to express our views at given time and place, America will not be a truly free society, Firstly, we wanna live in a free society with the freedom to express personal views at any given time and in any given place in America. The first amendment right gives us the freedom to act and the freedom to believe what we are doing is right. We should be able to live in a society where we are challenged to think about topics and ideas, have open debates and access to information. Will Creeley said “We feel there is inherent value in having your most deeply held beliefs tested” (Warren,Oct. 2010). We cannot dismiss a person’s First Amendment rights just because we find his acts offensive. This is often extremely difficult for most of us to understand and accept. The best approach is to educate ourselves in order to create the opportunity to debate and sustain our believes. Should a group of Muslims be allowed to build a mosque on the hollowed ground of ground zero in New York City? Should a liquor store or strip club be approved to be build next to the mosque? Yes,and yes they should be able to freely express their opinions without putting society in physically harm ways. Free speech, free exercise of religion, and free press stays at foundation of this country. Secondly, if we censor speech, America will not be a truly free society. We can not be almost free or half free in expressing our feelings and believes. We can’t let the government to censor a large amount of information by deciding what's offensive or not.. In the case of Frank Collin the appeals court said “If these civil rights are to remain vital for all,they most protect not only those society deems acceptable, but also those whose ideas is quite justifiably rejects and despises” (Warren,Oct. 2010).There is some truth to the argument that a Nazi parade in a community with Holocaust survivals it might be an offensive march. However the law cannot change or intervene in a person’s right to voice their own opinion in public just because these norms do not represent our personal individual beliefs. We have to understand that this believes represent a small minority of individuals who have adopted radical view. America will not be a free society if we agree on censoring people just because their message is hurtful for others.
Finally, Everyone has the given right to be protected from random violence or violent acts which intend to hurt a targeted group of individuals based on race, gender, sexuality, or even religion. Which brings me to Florida preacher Rev. Terry Jones, announced on the internet his intentions to burn a copy of the Quran he incited such acts of violence all over the world.
His announcement incited riots in Afghanistan Pakistan, Kashmir, and Indonesia resulting in 18 deaths total. No his announcement cannot be directly linked to the cause of these deaths, but the outcome of his announcement did cause others to commit violence which resulted in several deaths. I feel this should have been censored because this was a matter of public security in our country. By allowing this act of expression we are promoting to other countries what Radical Islamic terrorist groups already think and feel of the United States. That we hate Islamic beliefs in this country and we don’t condone others who feel the same way. This does not reflect the majority of how we feel in this country but only reflects a minor group of religious extremist. In conclusion free speech is the greatest right that Americans can enjoy, that any free society anywhere should enjoy.
These diverse opinions, are demonstrated through different forms of expression, one form is a public protest or rally to represent their cause or struggle. We often let our own personal feelings dictate what the law should do in extreme or controversial situations which challenge our normality’s within our society or regular standards of conduct our culture has adapted to over the years.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Westboro Baptist Church members led by Fred Phelps believe that God hates the United States and punishes its citizens for its acceptance of homosexuality. To express their beliefs, the church members picket military and other funerals. Phelps’ group pickets by carrying signs and singing songs while standing on public property. Other groups have been formed to protest Phelps’ group. The church claims their speech is protected by the First Amendment Freedom of Speech Clause in the United States Constitution. I agree that the church has this right as does the group protesting Phelp’s group, and neither is violating the constitutional rights of others, even though I believe the actions of Westboro Baptist Church are appalling and depraved.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging, the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views, both political and those of other concerns, are guaranteed. What happens, however, when your own government seizes and destroys these rights, in its attempt to censor the public 's pursuit of political knowledge. The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case brings forth this question and many more, as Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, was challenged in their attempt to broadcast "Hillary: the movie," by the FEC. The verdict, which was ruled in favor of Citizens United, deemed the film an act of the organization 'a first amendment right to free speech. Correct in their ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the abolition of restrictions…
- 945 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (http://www.law.cornell.edu).…
- 743 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…
- 1262 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…
- 445 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Offensive speech should be protected under the First Amendment. If speech could be prosecuted on the basis of being offensive to someone, nobody would be able to speak because everything people say has the ability to offend someone. People would no longer be able to question the government or its employees because it could be viewed as offensive, and some could even argue that specific religions are offensive. By not protecting seemingly offensive speech, it could lead to a slippery slope complex that could potentially infringe upon other rights. Moreover, any further restriction of free speech would hinder the marketplace of ideas, in turn discouraging open discourse and the spread of ideas.…
- 134 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When the general public is asked to refrain from the use of a few words that may be offensive to others, the right to freedom of speech is not infringed upon. In most cases a group of concerned citizens vocalize the need to discontinue the use of a particular word that evokes discomfort in other citizens. For example, there is a campaign against the use of the word “retarded,” and it is called “Spread the Word to End the Word (Downes).” It is not required by law for every citizen of the United States to abstain from using the word “retarded,” so the right to freedom of speech has not been…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The First Amendment guarantees “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” The freedom of speech, press, and religion have been pillars of the United States and other Democratic nations who knew the need to have these rights guaranteed. This idea was a major element of the Enlightenment period, the thoughts of John Locke, Jean Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Voltaire would be incorporated into the Constitution which included Freedom of Speech as a Human Right. Schenck v United States rules that the First Amendment stands for all speech as long as it doesn’t cause a “Clear and Present Danger.” No laws have been placed to decrease opinion.…
- 1212 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Overall, as Roger Rosenblatt stated and explained in his article defending the freedom of speech, the United States must not procreate censorship of any greater extent on its citizen’s voices. In fact, “The Founding Fathers…
- 1325 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The 1st and 5th Amendments are two of the most important ones from the Bill of Rights. Each one signifies an important piece of the United States in keeping American citizens safe and sound, and giving them a feeling of security and/or comfort. The 1st Amendment is the freedom of speech. This allows Americans to express their political, religious, and any other kind of idea of expression to others in a non-violent manner. Such as peaceful protests, religious expression, etc.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There is a fine line in what is considered freedom of speech and what impedes on another person’s freedom. In fact John Stuart Mill states in his book On Liberty, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (1978, 9). The use of hate speech has a strong impact, especially in minority groups where the support system is not very strong. One example hate speech being persecuted is in an article from the website Grapevine titled Ten Charged with Hate Speech Towards LGBT Community. While some individuals may argue that the freedom of speech is the right of all Americans, there are definitely limits when it comes to the hatred and harassment of a particular group. The law enacted which included sexual orientation in the group where hate speech is not allowed stemmed from the fact that the suicide rate for LGBT teens is much higher than it is for other teens. The Trevor project found LGBT teens are 4 times more likely to attempt…
- 767 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The first amendment states - “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”…
- 721 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
the material in question. In almost every case, the effort to ban books is said…
- 1668 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays