During his first appearance, Neil …show more content…
Looking at all the different articles I couldn't find anything different, all wrote about the same thing. There are many things said about the landing both positively and negatively. Before writing and researching for the paper, I knew very little about Neil Armstrong and his launching. The research paper also allowed being to find out up about the smallest details of the launching. Another important thing is that I found interesting people that witnessed the launching in today’s society are in their 50s-60s. They watched the launch on television; many people believe the whole launch was a conspiracy and was a scenario played by the United States so that they could get their reputation back. Before I had never thought about the landing and if it was a conspiracy theory or if it was accurate but after this paper, I also have some questions about the launching. Rather written evidence there were mostly pictures about the launching. The articles all wrote about how important and honorable event it was. While one article I read was from the Russian point of view and it stated that the reason why the United states made up of this lie is to protect its nation from falling. After Russia launched Sputnik, the United States needed to come up with a better plan to keep them at power. I do not believe that the moon landing was real mainly because the picture that was taken in space in one of them Armstrong is walking on the moon. How could one walk at zero gravity aren’t they supposed to be floating. Another picture that caught my attention was the flag that was put on the moon the flag was waving as if they were air. Finally, as the Russian newspaper had written, very interestingly the footage got erased at NASA. A remarkable event for humanity was not protected and disappeared, and no one knows