For and Against Increasing Life Expectancy in European Countries
For and Against Increasing Life Expectancy in European Countries.
Life expectancy in Europe is an issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate, with supporters maintaining that it is vital, whilst opponents claim that it will lead to the absolute crash of European economic system and even to global problems.
Firstly, it is obvious that the economic situation of Europe, nowadays, is very unstable. Hence, in such actual it will be very complex, even impossible for government to pay an old-age pension to a big number of people, if the growth of life expectancy continues to increase; as a result it can mean almost the death of European economic system, which is not to be long for this world. Therefore, as the case stands, France took the first step three years ago (in 2010) in order to facilitate this economic tension: the pension age was increased to 62 years.
Secondly, this “local problem” can spread over the whole world and split in two different issues. The first one, if European economic crashes it will lead to the whole collapse of world bank system, because mainly countries keep their gold and foreign exchange reserve directly in gold and foreign exchange, the latter consists of bi-currency basket which includes dollars of America and euro. Furthermore, it is a proved fact that our world will be overpopulated in 40 years or less, what, of course, will lead to problems that are transparent.
In contrast, the opponents of this way of thinking claim that when people know that the average life expectancy in their country is high, the whole atmosphere changes. Thus, people do not have to rush in order to have time to fulfill their high hopes, as a result in such country the level of stress will reduce and the satisfaction with the country where they live will grow. Hence, the danger from the society to rebel will be less; therefore, the whole condition of this country will be stable.
All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain
Life expectancy in Europe is an issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate, with supporters maintaining that it is vital, whilst opponents claim that it will lead to the absolute crash of European economic system and even to global problems.
Firstly, it is obvious that the economic situation of Europe, nowadays, is very unstable. Hence, in such actual it will be very complex, even impossible for government to pay an old-age pension to a big number of people, if the growth of life expectancy continues to increase; as a result it can mean almost the death of European economic system, which is not to be long for this world. Therefore, as the case stands, France took the first step three years ago (in 2010) in order to facilitate this economic tension: the pension age was increased to 62 years.
Secondly, this “local problem” can spread over the whole world and split in two different issues. The first one, if European economic crashes it will lead to the whole collapse of world bank system, because mainly countries keep their gold and foreign exchange reserve directly in gold and foreign exchange, the latter consists of bi-currency basket which includes dollars of America and euro. Furthermore, it is a proved fact that our world will be overpopulated in 40 years or less, what, of course, will lead to problems that are transparent.
In contrast, the opponents of this way of thinking claim that when people know that the average life expectancy in their country is high, the whole atmosphere changes. Thus, people do not have to rush in order to have time to fulfill their high hopes, as a result in such country the level of stress will reduce and the satisfaction with the country where they live will grow. Hence, the danger from the society to rebel will be less; therefore, the whole condition of this country will be stable.
All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain