America shouldn’t spend billions on Ford-Class aircraft carriers because America already has enough carriers, the carrier force is in danger of new weapons that could reduce the power of carriers, America should have less ambition so that there will be less wars and less lives lost, and because some members of Congress are even thinking about cutting Social Security and Medicare for the military. Building more carriers when they may be rendered useless or take money or lives from American citizens is an atrocious idea, and the American government shouldn’t do it. The idea of making more carriers is a wolf in sheep’s skin; though it may benefit the American people in certain …show more content…
ways, it will also have detrimental effects on them. First, the U.S.
shouldn’t be spending so much money on aircraft carriers. Instead, they should ask for cuts in Pentagon and Navy spending. In the article, “Should America Spend Millions on Super-Carriers” by Mark Weisbrot, he says how “The Pentagon has only created enemies when they say they are protecting the nation.” This implies that the Pentagon says that they are working for national security, yet they do things that do not seem to benefit us. For example, drone strikes in countries like Yemen are only killing innocent civilians, and the only impact this makes is that America gets another enemy. They have only created enemies so far, and giving them more money would worsen the problem. America should ask for more cuts in spending because that forces the Pentagon to fight less wars and cause less damage. America should try to be involved in less wars so that the American people don’t suffer as much. If America was to keep funding the Pentagon as much as they are now, then the Pentagon would only create more and more wars that would cause America to lose more people and money. Basically, America should strive to create and get involved in less wars, and the best way to do this is by cutting the amount of money the Pentagon
has. Second, some people in Congress want to cut Social Security and Medicare for military purposes. This wouldn’t benefit American citizens; it would hurt them. Without these essential programs, many would have to get out of retirement or find a way to make more money to pay for medical care or to be able to live have. “Social Security makes up a large part of an old person’s salary, so taking it away would be detrimental to them (Weisbrot).” Due to this, Congress shouldn’t take away Medicare or Social Security to fund the Pentagon’s pointless wars. After all, they haven’t done too much good for us in the end, only creating wars and costing the U.S. a massive amount of money in the end. Taking away money and medical support from those who need it just to help a military that only costs us is an unwelcome idea. Altogether, it would be a deplorable action to take away Social Security or Medicare for military when the military has done nothing but creates wars and cost us lives and money. Third, the smaller the empire America has, the better off they are. The less wars America gets involved in because of empire, the better. The more wars the Pentagon chooses to interfere in and the more wars the Pentagon creates, the more lives and money we lose in America. The American government should strive to be less ambitious so that they would get into less wars. This would help save many lives inside and outside of America. On the other hand, if America chooses to get a larger empire, then they would suffer more deaths and spend more money just for the military. The less strife in the world the better, and one of the best ways to do this is to bring back our ambitions and cause less deaths and wars. This unquestionably could bring about a colossal difference in the long run, one that would bring us closer to a future with less wars and deaths. To sum it up, America should aim for a smaller empire and less ambition so that they can have less deaths and less money spent. Finally,