One of the greatest events that challenged the entire Filipino society was the EDSA People power revolution happened on the 25th day of February 1986, a history that put the power on the hands of the Filipino people, considered to be the moment of the great emancipation from coercion. It was an ideal decision that freed the people and won the freedom of right politics. Based on the historical data gathered, the regime of Marcos, although with lots of positive perceptions made him reign for a long period of time, the negative application of force still manifested on the different dimensions of his government, which triggered the people to protest and make an action against. The task of right government which is the social order has vanished in the latter part of his term. The relationship and orientation of things folded into chaos. People, eventually seek for a new reform, a reformation that will lead them somehow to the ideal city, a place where peace, truth, equality and order reign, and this, was marked as the beginning of the modern historical revolution. The Filipino people at that moment, whether not all were totally present still fulfilled the dream of a new reformation. The whole society stood as “Homo Particepts” and “Homo Contemplans” and not as a mere“HomoSpectans”. One of the tasks of government is to maintain the social order in the society. This can be seen in the different institutions and codified laws being implemented within. The authorities also have the objective of making the economy in the summit of progress and not to exclude the oppressed to the map of flourishing. It is also their duty to make balance reciprocity between the elite and the marginalized, a humanitarian implication of social justice in the realm of social order. One of the prominent figures of 20th century Philosophy is Michel Foucault; he explored the shifting patterns of power within a
Bibliography: _______________.Joseph De Torre, Christian Philosophy, (Philippines: Vera- Reyes Inc., 1980) _______________.Post-modernism, For the Beginners _______________.Mariano Artigas, History of Philosophy, (Philippines: Sinag-tala Publishers Inc., 1990) _______________.Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984) _______________ .Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000) ______________ .Raymond Geuss, The Idea of Critical Theory; Habermas and the Frankfurt School, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 1981) _______________.Baudrillard, J. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. (London: Sage. 1998, 1970) _______________.Edith, Kurzweil, The age of Structuralism; Levi Strauss to Foucault, (New York: Columbian Press., 1980) _______________.Gary Gutting, Foucault; a very short Introduction, (New York: Oxford University Press., 2005) _______________.Gary Gutting, The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 1994) _______________.Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Second Edition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., 1983) _______________.Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans _______________.Sara Mills, Michel Foucault, (London and New York: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group., 2003, 2004) ______________ .Shumway, Michel Foucault, (U.S.A.: University Press of Virginia., 1989) _______________.E. San Juan, From Globalization to National Liberation; Essay of three decades, (Quezon City: The University of the Philippines Press., 2008) ______________.Onofre D ______________.Alfred McCoy, An Anarchy of Families: State and Families in the Philippines (Madison: University of WisconsinMadison Center for Southeast Asian Studies., 1993) _______________.Paul D _______________.Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, (London: Verso, 1983) Internet references: [ 5 ]. See Foucault on Post-Structuralism, Jim Powell, Post-modernism; for beginners, (U.S.A.: Writers and Readers Publishing Inc., 1998) [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984), p.4-5. [ 8 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000), p.21. [ 9 ]. See Wikipedia, on the article about the “Authority” concept, accessed on December 01, 2010. [ 10 ]. Notes in the Philosophy of Science; Thomas Kuhn’s “the structure of scientific revolution”, December 02, 2010. [ 11 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000),p. 30. [ 12 ]. Notes on Social Critical Theory, A.Y. 2009-2010. [ 19 ]. Gary Gutting, Foucault; a very short Introduction,(New York: Oxford University Press., 2005), p.2. [ 21 ]. See Michel-Foucault.com, Humanism and Death of Man. Accessed on December 18, 2010. [ 22 ]. Alison Leigh Brown, On Foucault, (U.S.A.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning., 2000), p.7. [ 24 ]. Paul Rabinow, The Foucault reader, (New York: Random House Inc., 1984),p. 9. [ 25 ]. Cf. Edith, Kurzweil, The age of Structuralism; Levi Strauss to Foucault, (New York: Columbian Press., 1980), p.205. [ 28 ]. Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Second Edition, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press., 1983),p.117. [ 31 ]. Code of Hammurabi is collection of the laws and edicts of the Babylonian king Hammurabi, and the earliest legal code known in its entirety. See “Code of Hammurabi”, Microsoft Encarta Reference Library 2005. 1993-2004 Microsoft Corporation. [ 32 ]. See Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, (New York: A Division of random House, Inc., 1977), 3-5. [ 34 ]. Garry Gutting, Foucault; a very short introduction,(Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2005), 80. [ 38 ]. Garry Gutting, Foucault; a very short introduction, (Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2005), 80. [ 40 ]. Cf. Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, (New York: A Division of random House, Inc., 1977), 23.