Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Founding Brothers

Satisfactory Essays
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Founding Brothers
1. What was your favorite chapter and why? My favorite chapter was the chapter about the duel. The duel was my favorite chapter because the duel seemed never ending and exciting. The chapter began with background information about Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr family lives. After the background information is passed, the chapter goes into great detail about the duel. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton were not friends. Hamilton helped Thomas Jefferson defeat Burr in the Presidential election. later on when Burr was Vice President, he ran for governor in New York. Hamilton had such a great influence on his home state that Burr lost the election to be governor. Burr had challenged Hamilton to a duel because of some offensive comments from Hamilton. Ultimately, Burr had severely wounded Hamilton, who died days later. According to the chapter, two shots were heard, Hamilton died but Burr claims he never shot at Hamilton. So because Burr denies shooting at Hamilton, it makes you think what really happened? This chapter was my favorite because it actually forced me to think about what really happened with the two shots heard.

2. Why did Ellis choose the title Founding Brothers? I think Ellis chose “Founding Brothers” as the title because the men who are known to have helped make America a better country regardless if they ruined our economy or whatever were the founders and brothers in the sense that they all had some part in the creation of where America is today. The men in this book didn’t exactly always know what they were doing when they started building America up to be the country it is today. The word “Brothers” is more easily to be connected with. Also the fact that they all had some sort of relationship with each other, whether it was an argument, they fought like brothers. He also could have named the book “Founding Brothers” because they all came from the same time period so there weren’t seeing one another as fathers but brothers. They are seen as fathers today because looking back through history they were the first people to make a major impact on our country such as gaining our independence and many other things. 3. Why do you think Ellis chose the specific events he wrote about? I think Ellis chose the specific events that he wrote about because they were major events in history. It was like background information on information that was already known but younger generations could easily understand from his book. The events were also good information points for the name he chose. Since the events were written in story form, it made learning the important historical facts more interesting and easy to grasp. It is much easier to follow and grasp the information with a story rather than historians word for word recall of the events. When you are reading this book, you can imagine yourself actually there when Ellis is describing all the events that go on. I also think Ellis chose the specific events he wrote about because they were what he felt was important enough for the general public to know.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph J. Ellis is an American writer and professor at the University of Massachusetts. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. from Yale University. His studies focus on the founding of the United States, giving special attention to the founding fathers. He has written several books focusing on founding fathers such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington. His book, American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson, won the National Book Award for Nonfiction in 1997. In 2001, Ellis was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in history his book Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. Ellis is definitely qualified to write a book on the most important founder of the United States: George Washington.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He describes the conspiracy as if he was there and almost puts you in the midst of every conversation and every decision made. John Wilkes Booth first decided to get rid of Abraham Lincoln the day after the presidential election of 1864. The author describes Booth as a strong man and somewhat smart. He was emotionally immature but very prideful in his own ways. Booth was a southerner by choice and decided to contribute to the confederacy in a big way. He first decided to capture Lincoln. The author says he had no fear for life. After Booth thought up his schemes, he finally decided upon one. He tested it and perfected his attack. He got his conspirators together and they talked and planned it out. They even had alternative options in case they needed to change any of their plans. The author has such small descriptions of every day and what people did, you can get lost in this book. The author goes through every hour before and after the assassination of Lincoln. He speaks about who talked to who, who ate and drank what, what they were doing, what time they went, etc…It gets somewhat overwhelming to interpret what the author is saying because he…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most interesting parts of the Founding Brothers is is the friendship between Adams and Jefferson. It is a symbol of how these men bonded over freedom rather than how they had different party concerns. In this quote Adam suggests to resonate with Jefferson, and reveals to how these men were invested in union they created…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Killer Angels Book Review

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The novel I chose for the historical book review is called The Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara. This novel is about the Battle of Gettysburg during the Civil War, and it is written from the perspective of the people fighting while sharing their thoughts and feelings about the battle as it goes on. Although it is historical fiction, The Killer Angels centers around the Battle of Gettysburg, which, of course, really took place. While the strategy of the battle is factual, the dialogue is fictitious. The book starts with a Foreword that gives details of the armies and people involved. Four main chronological sections cover the days of Monday, June 29, 1863, through Friday, July 3, 1863, while switching between viewpoints Union and Confederate participants. An Afterword tells the reader what happens to several of the key characters. Even though a chapter is written from one commander's perspective, the author still allows you to see what some of the other characters in those scenes are thinking. Without this way of writing the novel, the reader wouldn’t truly be able to understand thoughts and opinions of the soldiers, so some of the choices wouldn't have made as much sense. Shaara included the arguments between characters about how to go about the attack, which gives the reader much more details about how complicated the few days of the battle were.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Juice Bros

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bud Gaugh and Eric Wilson grew up in the same neighborhood. In high school they formed a band with their future manager, Michael Happoldt, called The Juice Bros. The band was a purely punk rock band. Then, Brad Nowell dropped out of the University of California and joined the band. Nowell introduced ska and reggae to the band to form the band's punk, ska, and reggae blend.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author wrote the book from a more social point of view, focusing on the relationships between the founding fathers and how these relationships affected the forming of our nation. Ellis is sympathetic for how Burr and Adams are often victims of the political maneuvering and gamesmanship done by Hamilton and Jefferson. Ellis used letters from letters between Jefferson and Adams, historic books, letters between the founding fathers, newspaper articles, and historical documents to base his argument; his sources are not one sided and show multiple…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, Ellis divided his book Founding Brothers into six sections. Each section is told from the perspective of both foresight and hindsight. This split is a reoccurring theme throughout the entire book. He presents his findings in the form of stories, to draw readers into the book. The chapters are linked by Ellis's quest for a balanced truth as he takes readers on a journey through the history of the American…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    son of the mob

    • 302 Words
    • 1 Page

    The most exciting part of the book is when Vince confronts Ray to tell him he knows he is the spy. Ray pulls a gun out and points it aiming at Vince’s face. Vince quickly turns the light off and hides. Ray shoots than turns the light back on. He notices that he didn’t shoot Vince and that he is still hiding in the apartment. As Ray walks past the couch Vince jumps up from behind it throwing him onto the ground and knocking the gun out of his hand.…

    • 302 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found the climax of the story to be the most interesting and surprising part of the book.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Founding Fathers: The Revolutionary Generation by Joseph J. Ellis demonstrated or portrayed the overview of the early American years to the post-revolutionary era. To emphasize, the book Founding Fathers mainly focuses on the main or background perspective of our true founding fathers. To add, the author Joseph J. Ellis does a great job pointing out the information that was never read or anyone knew about. The author shows the problems that our founding fathers faced and the way they are portrayed in our modern texts or readings.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Bradley Boys

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My father-in-law, Robert E. Brown, a prolific storyteller, grew up in Bradley, South Dakota, a railroad town servicing the surrounding farming community on the eastern Dakota prairie. Although his childhood encompassed the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl eras, his anecdotes didn’t dwell on the hardships. Rather, he recalled and passed on fond memories of these years. Several of his stories recounted events regarding mischievous activities carried out by the males from Bradley. Boys will be boys.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the term “Founding Fathers” ring a bell? Warren G. Harding was the first man on record to refer to the first statesmen of America as the “Founding Fathers;” over fifty years after the last American Revolutionary soldier had died (Bernstein pg. 4). How interesting that this common term that we associate George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, just to name a few, was not such a common term. R.B. Bernstein’s The Founding Fathers Reconsidered, gives us a different view of what we associate “Founding Fathers” to be. All of the founders showed an outstanding ability to adapt not only to unstable environments during the birth of a nation, but to their political environment as well. The author's primary argument was in fact that all the "Fathers" did not get along and share the same views.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Menendez Brothers

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legal issue here is a double homicide. The two young men, Lyle Menendez and Erik Menendez, were accused and later convicted of killing their parents. On the night of the murder, their parents, Jose Menendez and Kitty Anderson, were at lying on the couch asleep when their two sons came in and shot them both dead with shotguns. The shot guns were purchased several days before, showing premeditation. The boys purposely chose to murder their parents on a night when their maid was off work, displaying special legal circumstances “lying and wait.” Due to these “special circumstances” the Menendez brothers were eligible for the death penalty. The brother’s defense was that they were sexually and psychologically abused by their mother and father for years. The brothers painted a picture of how controlling and abusive their father was and that their mother was emotionally and mentally unstable. The brothers never mentioned a word about the alleged abuse before the trial started, not even to their psychotherapist Dr. Jerome Oziel. The boys said that they feared their parents were going to kill them and they acted upon it by killing them out of fear. The prosecution claimed that the boys were selfish and that their motive was greed because they were not going to put into their fathers will. There are a few pieces of evidence that really make the brothers story hard to believe. One is the 911 call where the boys acted like they were upset that “someone killed their parents.” Two, after their parents were dead the young men spent approximately one million dollars of their parents money on over indulging themselves. Three, the tapes that were retrieved from their psychotherapist contained their confession. In these tapes they threatened his life if Dr. Oziel turned them in. The Menendez brothers had two trials, both in which they plead not guilty. The first one ended…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every chapter in this book had something different about it due to the fact that this book covers so many parts of a subject that people know very little about. In terms of most surprising and most disgusting chapter, chapter 10 Eat Me takes the human cake. The different ideas people had about eating pieces of human and the cures they associated with them were so bizarre and so…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Just like that. From a hundred miles an hour to asleep in a nanosecond. I wanted so badly to lie down next to her on the couch, to wrap my arms around her and sleep. Not fuck, like in those movies. Not even have sex. Just sleep together, in the most innocent sense of the phrase. But I lacked the courage and she had a boyfriend and I was gawky and she was gorgeous and I was hopelessly boring and she was endlessly fascinating. So I walked back to my room and collapsed on the bottom bunk, thinking that if people were rain, I was drizzle and she was a hurricane.”…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays