Preview

Four Types Of Intentional Torts And Negligence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Four Types Of Intentional Torts And Negligence
There are two different types of torts intentional torts and negligence. An intentional tort is a harm that a person desires or intends to bring about; as opposed to harms that are a result of carelessness. Intentional torts are as follows: 1) assault, 2) battery, 3) false imprisonment, 4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, 5) trespass to land, 6) trespass to chattels, and 7) conversion.
Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary
    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bugusa Case Summary

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gansz Vs. Alton Haunted House: Case Study
    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gansz Vs. Alton Haunted House: Case Study

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work
    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Law 421 week 2 work

    Intentional torts can be described as deliberate acts to harm someone. Negligence can be described to deliberately choose not to act in order to fix a problem which ultimately results in someone being harmed. There are several elements that need to be present in order for a claim to be considered negligence (Melvin, 2011). According to our text these elements need to be present in order to be considered negligence:…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 12 in Law 12 textbook
    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12 in Law 12 textbook

    An intentional tort is a person deliberately causing harm or loss to another person. Examples are trespassing, causing a nuisance and defaming are intentional torts.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health
    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence
    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Elements Of Negligence

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline
    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    Tort Outline

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law 421
    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law 421

    Torts can fall under 3 categories intentional torts, negligent torts, and strict liability. Intentional torts include intentionally hitting someone, negligent torts causing a traffic accident, and strict liability, making and selling defective merchandise. Tort law also includes the areas of nuisance, defamation, invasion of privacy and economic torts.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Intentional Torts

    In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is holding another person down against their will. The reason it is considered defense of persons because Leroy was using reasonable force by protecting Jane the third person from injury where John threatened by an attacking force.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to Law
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction to Law

    Torts have traditionally been classified into one of four major categories based on whether they involve intentional acts,…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Medical Malpractice Reform
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Medical Malpractice Reform

    These element are "duty, breach, causation, and damage" (Matzo, 2015). Additionally, there are statutory controls which these element are subject to in malpractice cases (Matzo, 2015). These statutory controls separate malpractice from other personal injury lawsuits (Matzo, 2015). The elements and factors involved in medical malpractice lawsuits make them a challenge to win and the challenge is rightly justified (Matzo, 2015). There are also arguments in defense of medical malpractice, which include disproving medical negligence, proving patient negligence, support of the medical profession, and contributory negligence (Reuters, 2015: Lau & Johnson, 2015). Even though medical malpractice tort law appears to be complete as it stands, some argue it requires…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torts
    • 18542 Words
    • 1 Page

    Torts

    Intentional Interference With Person or Property A. Intent 2 types 1. Specific Intent consciously desiring the physical result 2. General Intent knowledge that the result is substantially certainty to follow -The Restatement places torts somewhat on a continuum with Negligence The most culpable form of intent would be a specific intent, or morally apprehensible form of misconduct you swing a baseball bat to hit someone in the face General intent would be next on the continuum knowing with substantial certainty Recklessness- Callous disregard ( I dont give a crap. Gross Negligence- aware of the harm but you are indifferent to it Negligence- foreseeable risk of harm but you fail to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances Most culpable (responsible/punishable)…

    • 18542 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Tort
    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Intentional Tort

    Intentional Tort is a purposeful act committed by a person against another person that results in harm. In this case it is a nursing assistant harming a patient. An example is a nurse put poison in the patient’s food to inflict harm on them.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    irac- negligence
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    irac- negligence

    Negligence is defined as persons or business’s actions that make them liable to foreseeable consequences of their actions. There are certain steps that the plaintiff needs to prove negligence on the defendant’s behalf. These elements are duty of care, breach of this duty of care, plaintiff suffered injury, defendant caused the injury, and it was the proximate cause for the plaintiffs’ injury (Cheeseman, 2013).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Intentional Torts Research Paper
    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Intentional Torts Research Paper

    In order to understand this scenario one must grasp the types of torts. We have intentional torts; negligence; and strict liability. (Torts.uslegal.com, 2015, Types of Torts - Torts. Retrieved 4 May 2015, from http://torts.uslegal.com/types-of-torts). An intentional tort is basically a “civil wrong doing” that happens when the “wrong doer” intentionally causes damages to another. (Torts.uslegal.com, 2015, Types of Torts - Torts. Retrieved 4 May 2015, from http://torts.uslegal.com/types-of-torts). There are many types of intentional torts, such as trespass, battery; false imprisonment and fraud just to name a few. Negligence is that when “careless conduct” is present as well as a…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More