Preview

Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
What is the 4th Amendment?
The 4th Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.

What are some concerns a crime scene investigator or detective should be aware of?

Some concerns a crime scene investigator should be aware of include paying attention to details and watching their surroundings. Photography everything because you can never have too many photos, take notes of information such as times, temperatures, and little things others may not notice.

Please give an example when knowledge of the 4th Amendment must be applied to a crime scene.

An example of when knowledge of the 4th Amendment must be applied to a crime scene is when warrantless searches were or will be made. The evidence collected through warrantless searches can be deemed inadmissible in court.

Please research and explain landmark case, such as Mapp v. Ohio, Terry v. Ohio, etc.

On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Three officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Dollree Mapp refused to admit them without a search warrant. Two officers left, and one remained. Three hours later, the two officers returned with several officers. Showing a piece of paper they broke in the door. Dollree Mapp asked to see the warrant and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled with Mapp and took the piece of paper away from her. They handcuffed her for being belligerent. They did not find the bombing suspect or the gambling equipment. They did however, find pornographic material in a trunk in her basement. She was arrested, prosecuted, and found guilty for possession of pornographic material. Mrs. Mapp and her attorney appealed this decision

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mapp vs. ohio: The surrounding of the case was the police came in her house try to find a bomb suspect they found the bomb suspect but they also found pornograph pics of her self so she was arrested that day. The supreme court's decision was that when a police officer is searching you or your house they have to specify what they are looking for. The courts decision maid a big change because the cops if they come in your house looking for a gun but they find a knife they cant arrest you for it because they have to specify what they are looking for.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 1081, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961)…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This work POL 303 Week 2 Discussion Questions 1 4th Amendment comprises solution of the following task: "What rights are protected by the 4th Amendment? Provide three concrete examples. Why are unreasonable searches forbidden? What factors determine whether a search is reasonable or not? Explain in 200…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Signifance: The 4th amendment prohibits the unlawful search and seizure of resident belonging to citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219).…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mrs. Mapp was found guilty and sentenced to prison 1-7 years. Mrs. Mapp and her attorney took the case to the Supreme Court in Ohio.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as adopted as part of the Bill of Rights was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison and was ratified in 1791. The amendment dealt with legal search and seizure.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the two-fold requirement discussed in Katz v. United States, for analyzing when a search occurs under the 4th Amendment.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Dbq Analysis

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment is used in a precedent case, Katz v. United States. It states, “[T]he Fourth Amendment protects people, not places…” (Document A) With this considered, the police did not invade his personal belongings, only the view of a public space (Document C). Justice John Paul Stevens says, “Heat waves, like aromas that are generated in a kitchen…, enter the public domain if and when they leave a building…” (Document F) The government has complete jurisdiction in what they are doing, because Document E states, “The use of the thermal imager in this case is not a Fourth Amendment search”. Sam this is an excellent paragraph. You are able to combine various documents into one…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolf v Colorado

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief Fact Summary. Police officers sought a bombing suspect and evidence of the bombing at the petitioner, Miss Mapp’s (the “petitioner”) house. After failing to gain entry on an initial visit, the officers returned with what purported to be a search warrant, forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search in which obscene materials were discovered. The petitioner was tried and convicted for these materials.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This rule gives police officers the ability to seize evidence involved in a crime without a warrant if the evidence is in plain sight. This rule is limited by probable cause which requires police officers to have probable cause and believe the items in plain view are evidence before they seize them. The fourth amendment does prevent unreasonable searches and seizures.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A. Fourth Amendment: Reasonableness Requirement The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures of persons, papers, houses, and effects by the government. A search or seizure occurs when the government violates a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidence gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible in a criminal trial against the defendant.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The history of the fourth amendment does not have a clear path. According to the history found in Search and Seizure and the Supreme Court, a study in constitutional interpretation,…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our Fourth Amendment rights prohibit unlawful searches and seizures, but do not state how evidence that is obtained from searches can be used. In 1914 with the case of Weeks vs. United States, the court ruled that illegally obtained evidence can not be used in federal cases. The above sentence is known as the Exclusionary Rule. Our lesson notes explain that the Exclusionary rule states, “that any evidence obtained from an illegal search must be excluded from criminal proceedings on the basis of the Fourth Amendment, as well as the Fifth Amendment's provision against self-incrimination, though more court rulings allow for a “good faith exception” to the Exclusionary Rule (Rio Salado, 2017).”…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays