Preview

Fracking: Greenhouse Gas and Water

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1435 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fracking: Greenhouse Gas and Water
What's the Fracking Problem?

W hy does everyone care so much about natural gas? Why is it such an essential part of modern culture? Sure, it's an exciting and up and coming technology, which is fuel for the technological generation that we've grown up in, but we need to take a closer look to see the methods and impacts that could affect generations after us.

Water is one of our important resources that were given to us by mother nature. We see water as a source for survival and many more advantages. It's fragile, and the smallest amount of contaminants could ruin it for a population, yet one of the major ingredients in fracking processes is the water. Reports of accidents involving water contamination are everywhere. The basic process of fracking is its uses of incredible amounts of gallons of water per drill and drilling so close to groundwater sources risk contamination. "Accidents have already been documented and citizen's well waters have been tainted with toxic chemicals", according to the Climate Progress. (Foster) Many of the chemicals used in the fracking process are proven toxins. These include benzene, ethyl-benzene, toluene, xylene, naphthalene, and other hazardous chemicals that are harmful if any contact is made.

For these reasons, fracking in the United States should be halted. All around the United States, there are areas where the drilling takes place. Everywhere, people were told that there is nothing to worry about and that hydraulic fracturing was safe. Those people were being lied to. People in their homes were reporting health issues. Everything leads up to the water, and not the water that was once safe, but the water they came to know after the drilling of the wells. Environmental laws have been violated time after time. What is most outrageous is that families in their homes aren't able to shower or use the water at all because they were fearful of their health. There are even reports of rashes on the skin and many other health problems.



Cited: Cooley, Heather, and Kristina Donnelly. " Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction" . Oakland: n.p., 2012. Print. Entine, Jon. "University Of Texas-Environmental Defense Fund Shale Gas Study Unmasks Politics of Anti-Fracking..." Forbes . Forbes Magazine, 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 27 Jan. 2014. Foster, Joanna M. "More Than Flaming Water: New Report Tracks Health Impacts of Fracking on Pennsylvania Residents ' Health."Think Progress RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Jan. 2014. "Frack Fluid Spill Contaminates Stream, Killing Fish." MNN . Propublica, 22 Sept. 2009. Web. 28 Jan. 2014. Walsh, Bryan. "Science & Space." Science Space Contaminated EPA Says Fracking Likely Polluted Groundwater Comments . N.p., 09 Dec. 2011. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fracking wells inject water, sand, and chemicals deep into the ground to mine natural gas. Runoff from this process inevitably ends up in groundwater systems. It takes 360 billion gallons of harmful chemicals to run all of the fracking wells in The U. S. If leaked, respiratory, sensory, and neurological…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They are concerned that millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater are produced from fracking methods and that there are currently no facilities operating to remove these pollutants. When separated by a mile or more from groundwater sources and the earth’s surface, the ancient marine waters along with naturally existing toxic compounds are not an issue, but “Fracking disturbs, distributes, and carries upward with the fracked gas ‘produced waters’ containing radioactive materials, heavy metals, hydrocarbons such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and toluene [sic.]), bromide, highly concentrated salts, and many other organic and inorganic compounds that, when exposed to our environment, are dangerous health hazards—many are known as carcinogens and toxic to biological life” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). Which brings up the question of why can’t they use less toxic chemicals in the fracking process? Tracy Carluccio, the Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, continues by stating, “even if companies were to switch to ‘green’, ‘non-toxic’ fracking fluids, drilling and fracking in these deep formations will always deliver potentially deadly chemical hazards, even in a perfectly regulated world” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). The cement and steel casings used in combination with the methods for sealing post-production gas wells do not confine the methane along with other dangerous gases and contaminated fluids that are pressurized within the aquifer.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘ Spills, accidents, improper disposal and poor well construction can lead the toxic chemicals in fracking fluid entering drinking water; more than 1,000 cases of water contamination near drilling sites were documented nationally’ according to the Food and Water Watch group. This adverse pollution of groundwater cannot be reversed and it may be difficult to detect and address all the problem sources because Fracking Companies do not need to disclose what is used in the process. Fracking can also lead to droughts as water is sometimes extracted from already water-deprived communities. Only a tiny percent of water is regained and stored in pits, and still ends up being hazardous to living things around them. There were many reports of illnesses in livestock that were exposed to these waste water pits, and according to the results of an experimental study every tree exposed to fracking…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hydraulic fracturing, commonly referred to as fracking, has been a hot topic of debate in the United States of America since its inception in 1947 and first well drill in 1949. The United States was the first country to perform hydraulic fracturing to tap into a previously unavailable resource, natural gases deep underground in very small micro veins that spider web across a large area. The concerns are, and have included, most importantly health concerns and tax revenues. Controversy and a big difference between the local citizens and the oil companies has brought this topic to a heated debate. Citizens become increasingly concerned about health issues and damaged environments. Therefore discussing these subjects is becoming increasingly difficult.…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking in North Texas

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fracking requires up to 5 million gallons of water per well and perhaps even more in which case, the tons of water used would create a huge demand of local water supplies (Dong). Unlike agriculture or domestic water uses, gas drilling does not return the used water back into in the ground (Myers). The water can not go back into the ground because the returned water not only has added chemicals that helped with fracturing but also has about 40,000 gallons of chemicals that were previously added (Dong). Sometimes, the used water can leak out in surrounding lakes and rivers. Those lakes and rivers supply the surrounding communities with water but now since fracking, the water is polluted. The chemicals that are in the water can cause serious illnesses and possibly be life threatening since most chemicals are poisonous.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated before, to get to the shale of gas, the drill passes through the fresh water aquifer. The aquifer is where the public gets their water. A popular pro- hydraulic fracturing argument is that there is not any traceable pollution due to drilling; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection says the contrary. “The Department has determined that eighteen…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is damaging our watersheds and for some of us, fracking sites are in our own backyards. The Environmental Protection Agency seems to have a few holes in it, as you will see in my research. First, we need to understand how fracking works. It is a means of extracting natural gas and oil that lies within a shale rock formation thousands of feet below earth’s surface. When a well is drilled, millions of gallons of water, sand and all different chemicals are injected under high pressure, into the well. With all the pressure, it causes mini earthquakes, fracturing the ground and allowing natural gas to flow more freely. These wells are in locations that were previously inaccessible, ruining our beautiful countryside and being drilled below our reservoirs and water systems. Horizontal fracking uses a mixture of up to 600 different chemicals along with water. Some of these chemicals are known carcinogens and toxins including lead, uranium, mercury, ethylene glycol, radium, methanol, hydrochloric acid and formaldehyde. Let’s do the math; 500,000 active gas wells in the U.S, multiply that by 8 million gallons of water, multiply the 18 times a well can be fracked. That comes to 72 trillion gallons of water, 360 billion gallons of chemicals needed to run current gas wells. (dangersoffracking.com)…

    • 1987 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being as though fresh water is already an issue tainting nearly the whole planet, one would assume that there would be a serious effort to prevent further contamination of the water supply. Source C also explains how the chemicals used for fracking aren’t human-friendly which can lead to mutations in the skin. Finally, Source C touches open the emission of greenhouse gases. The release of such gases is harmful to our already deteriorating ozone layer. Other cons of fracking are explored in source B would be pollution associated with the process of fracking from the noise of fracking and the process itself.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    danps, (2011, April 30). The high cost of fracking – and the movement against it.…

    • 6828 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While fracking accidents are mostly harming the animals, fracking also pollutes the water, consequently people are noticing a huge change in water quality. Fracking contaminates the water in a very obvious way. Fracking could had been done only using water and clean sand. However to make the job easier and cheaper, the process includes many other 596 or more chemicals, many were harmful and some were unknown. Even though the fluid used in the process is pumped out after doing its job, it's impossible to get it all out. People found black grease, odors, methane, a gassy taste, and black sediments in their drinking water after the…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Fracking Is Bad

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people are fascinated and astonished with the term “Fracking”, which is a process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, and other forms of rocks so that the force of the liquid can open existing cracks or holes to extract oil or gas. Fracking was discovered by Geologist who found out that further opening a rock formation can expose oil and gas that's within the rock, but however even though Geologist is fascinated and intrigued by this process other people believe that Fracking is a danger to our world and cause major problems that can even harm humans, do to the different types of chemicals and gas that are leaking out of the rock that destroying the land and poisoning the air. I believe that Fracking should not be allowed to release oil or natural gas do to the harm and effects that it can cause to us and more importantly the world.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Fracking" Reflection

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent times, hydraulic fracturing, “fracking” has been questioned as to its positive affects in the American society. Instead of purchasing natural resources from other countries, America wanted to produce their own natural resources, thus, the term fracturing came into existence. With this in mind, jobs are created, cleaner gas is in the ozone, money is saved for the countries overall expenses, but the process behind to reach that goal consist of risks that can become a threat to water supply, food supply, and the environment as a whole. If certain protocol and procedures aren’t put in place “fracking” can very well be a negative aspect towards energy conservation for America’s businesses, government, and society.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Fracking

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As fracking can help get natural gas, it puts harsh chemicals in the air. In the town of Dish is in Texas, there has been toxic chemical brewing in the air from “cracked Barnett Shale more than two kilometers beneath the surface” said David Biello (Scientific American). Also fracking has created water pollution; water pollution is from leaks in wells that are poorly cased. David Biello states that “leaks from badly cased wells contaminated drinking water wells—and one even exploded” which shows that when things are not done properly problems can occur (Scientific American). Since fracking fluid is made up of a high percentage of water, contains many harmful chemicals, and this creates water pollution. “U.S News” confirms that “Water makes up an overwhelmingly high percentage of fracking fluid”, and “about 750 chemicals that have also been used in the process,” which shows why everyone thinks fracking is bad for the environment (is Fracking a Good Idea?). Although fracking has created these types of pollution, it has also helped America’s economy, and saved America a lot of money.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Fracking

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Imagine a world where there is no fresh clean drinking water. Where water supplies are rationed and the amount given is barely enough to drink let alone bathe or cook. This has not been an issue that most people would worry about; however it soon could be a reality due to hydraulic fracturing and the lack of federal regulations. Although there are some initial benefits to fracking, including more access to natural gas, more jobs, less dependence on other countries for gas and lower gas prices. What are the long term effects it will have? Is it worth the risk? Is this the new reality we are faced with or is there something that can be done before it is too late? These are just some of the issues I will discuss and address. However there…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays