Fracking Research Paper
To begin with, Fracking is incredibly repulsing thing to start doing. Not only is it an atrocious way to get materials, ruins the environment, displaces animals, slims down food supply, and causes mountains to look revaluating. Honestly why would someone in their right mind want to do this?
First, “while supporters of fracking talk about cheap energy it provides, they don’t mention its real cost.” (Salmon City Post 35). Although fracking makes the cost of energy go down it causes a lot more bad than good to happen in the world. Moreover, “Each fracking job requires anywhere from one to eight million gallons of water, with one-half million wells in the United States, that’s seventy two million gallons of water used per year.” (Salmon City …show more content…
However, “Up to forty thousand gallons of chemicals are used in each fracking operation, containing a toxic bath of 600 chemicals like mercury and uranium.” (Salmon City Post 35). After, “the shale rocks surrounding wells are fractured, methane gas and toxic chemicals flow into nearby ground water.” (Salmon City Post 35). Some studies show that the methane concentrations in drinking water wells are over 17 times higher near fracking sites. (Salmon City Post 35). Among, not only hurting the people, but hurting animals by taking their homes, polluting their water supply, and taking down their food supply.
On the other hand, some Americans are for fracking and think it is one of the best things ever for America. However, “Fracking is a process that increases output from an oil or natural gas as well.” (Lucia Hernandez 34). First of all, why doesn’t she honestly look at the pros and cons for fracking, the cons will definitely out whey the pros in this situation? “In addition, there are tremendous economic benefits to fracking.” (Lucia Hernandez 34). At the top, this has already been gone over fracking helps with costs of oil and gas, but the cost of fracking itself is extremely
First, “while supporters of fracking talk about cheap energy it provides, they don’t mention its real cost.” (Salmon City Post 35). Although fracking makes the cost of energy go down it causes a lot more bad than good to happen in the world. Moreover, “Each fracking job requires anywhere from one to eight million gallons of water, with one-half million wells in the United States, that’s seventy two million gallons of water used per year.” (Salmon City …show more content…
However, “Up to forty thousand gallons of chemicals are used in each fracking operation, containing a toxic bath of 600 chemicals like mercury and uranium.” (Salmon City Post 35). After, “the shale rocks surrounding wells are fractured, methane gas and toxic chemicals flow into nearby ground water.” (Salmon City Post 35). Some studies show that the methane concentrations in drinking water wells are over 17 times higher near fracking sites. (Salmon City Post 35). Among, not only hurting the people, but hurting animals by taking their homes, polluting their water supply, and taking down their food supply.
On the other hand, some Americans are for fracking and think it is one of the best things ever for America. However, “Fracking is a process that increases output from an oil or natural gas as well.” (Lucia Hernandez 34). First of all, why doesn’t she honestly look at the pros and cons for fracking, the cons will definitely out whey the pros in this situation? “In addition, there are tremendous economic benefits to fracking.” (Lucia Hernandez 34). At the top, this has already been gone over fracking helps with costs of oil and gas, but the cost of fracking itself is extremely