Frankenstein Fatherly Influence Essay

The Powers of a Fatherly Influence Mind control is generally thought of to be very explicit; usually with a director telling their victim exactly what to do regardless of what the victim wants. However, there are more forms of mind control other than the common overtaking scenario. The two father/creator figures in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein and Chaim Potok’s The Chosen are affecting their children subconsciously. They are both raising their children with little to no verbal or physical influence, which affects different results on both creations. The differing outputs of similar inputs shown in the two novels testifies that controlling another being is a risky project that can either shatter the being’s soul or develop it to the point of moral success. One parenting practice shared by both father figures is the lack of speech. As a result of his
Thanks to his father’s indirect control, Danny’s soul developed positively. Notably, the control he was receiving was positive. On the other hand, Frankenstein’s monster progressively got worse. He went from unintentionally killing to killing in spite of his creator. Opposite of Danny, his soul shrunk in dignity and compassion due to the negative control he was being fed. These outcomes demonstrate that respect is a key participant in any kind of activity.

The drastically varying outcomes of such similar practices proves that mind control is a precarious activity. The only thing that is certain about it is that respect plays a major role determining whether that unpredictable output is positive or negative, whether it kindles a kind soul or a despicable spirit. In some cases, such as Frankenstein’s, it is not even known that mind control is being performed at the time of the crime. Incidences such as these indicate that despite any surface of hatred, wretchedness, love, or amiability, respect should always be