Frankenstein Film Analysis

The name Frankenstein is most commonly thought of as the name of the monster. Because in modern culture today Frankenstein is thought as the monster. In reality Frankenstein is the last name of the scientist who’s full name is Victor Frankenstein. This new adaptation of Mary Shelley 1818 ‘Frankenstein’ clearly presents that fact for the new generation. So, Victor and Igor go on a journey to create the ever classic Frankenstein’s monster. The movie is titled ‘Victor Frankenstein’ and is set in the 18th century London, England. The director of the film is Paul Mcguigan, who decided to take some creative liberty on the story. This new spin on the classic tale, is shown through the eyes of Igor Victor’s hunchback assistant played by Daniel Radcliffe. Which is highly interesting because
Such as, Victor killing animal in the zoo or even Igor find a dead body in the freezer. Still the film had a very uplifting feel to it because of Igor and his improved way of life. Sadly, many tragic things happen in this film and there are some scenes in the film that are worthy of begin labeled a horror or thriller. Though, I found some of those parts of the film highly unnecessary. Such as, the presentation for the first monster it ran off and Igor chased after. Than Igor lost track of it room that is when the movie turned into a horror. That did not seem to fit with what was shown up to that point. However, it still got my heart pumping in fear for Igor. Altogether, the plot adapted from of Marry Shelley ‘Frankenstein’ holds some truth to the book. Still, what the director did change is a pleasant twist to an age old classic. Furthermore, the acting was neither horrendous nor exquisite I found nothing wrong with how the actors portrayed the character. Finally, the feel of the movie coincides very well with the dark tale of a man trying to play god but