Preview

Freedom of Speech: Abused from Abroad

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech: Abused from Abroad
Freedom of Speech: Abused from Abroad
Peter A. Purdon
Ppurdo1632@my.sullivan.edu
CSC302X - Social, Legal and Ethical Issues in Computing
Connie Eyle, Instructor

Abstract
Foreign hate groups are using America’s servers to circumvent their countries restrictions. As a responsible international citizen, America should revise our policies to allow the restriction of this right as applied to non-American groups hosting their message in our country. The constitution allows for the freedom of speech to all our citizens but does not specify this right being extended to those who do not reside or live here. The constitution was designed to protect us from tyranny and abuse by government and dictators. Our policies need to protect us from those that would slander a segment or our population. Foreign hate groups direct their views to those protected by the same document that affords them their right to post.
Freedom of Speech: Abused from Abroad
The first amendment protects the rights of Americans to have free speech even if that speech is hate speech but it should not be used to protect foreign hate speech just because it is hosted on an American server. The First Amendment really does distinguish the U.S., not just from Canada but from the rest of the Western world. (Liptak, 2008) Given the nearly unanimous international institution of regulations restricting online hate speech, the United States stands alone in its support of free speech—including Internet hate speech. (Breckheimer, 2011) These are good examples of our first amendment and how it is perceived across the globe. We are known for our liberal view of free speech protections and based on our history of oppression by monarchs and the purpose for us to seek a new land to call our own it fits our nation well to have such an amendment in place to protect the rights of our citizens.
I feel that this very right is being abused by foreign hate groups who not only direct their rhetoric towards others in


References: Liptak, A. (2008, June 11). Hate speech or free speech? what much of west bans is protected in u.s.. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/world/americas/11iht-hate.4.13645369.html?pagewanted=all Breckheimer, P. (2011). A haven for hate: the foreign and domestic implications of protecting internet hate speech under the first amendment. Retrieved from http://lawweb.usc.edu/why/students/orgs/lawreview/documents/Breckheimer_Peter_75_6.pdf Anti-Defamation League. (2000). Combating extremism in cyberspace. Retrieved from http://www.adl.org/civil_rights/newcyber.pdf Kang, C. (2009, November 23). Obama 's deputy technology officer mclaughlin: Free speech is net-neutrality foreign policy. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://voices.washingtonpost.com/posttech/2009/11/obama_deputy_technology_office.html Przybylski, P. (2011). A common tool for individual. Unpublished manuscript, Law, Vanderbuilt, Nashville, Tennesee. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=foreign hate speech hosted on us servers&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGkQFjAJ&url=http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-entertainment-technology-law/archive/download.aspx?id=2408&ei=p6LFTozXL6nb0QGYrNGaDw&usg=AFQjCNHDTfa-QfNQxt0fgOf_oym7cr2YGA
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gmail Sociology Paper 2
    • 629 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gmail Sociology Paper 2

    As citizens of the United States our first Amendment rights state that we have freedom of speech and press. Most…

    • 629 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Roof Case
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Daniel Roof Case

    examines state hate crime legislation, including an analysis on some early United States Supreme Court opinions related to state hate crime legislation. Part V of this Note looks federal hate crime legislation. Finally, Part VI lays out this paper’s proposed amendment to our current federal hate crime legislation, and explains why modifying the current federal hate crime law to mandate the prosecution of hate crimes at the federal level, will positively influence hate crime legislation at the state level.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jon Lovett The Culture Of Shut Up Analysis
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jon Lovett The Culture Of Shut Up Analysis

    The writer opinion is that protecting freedom of speech is now up to people of the Internet age. As institutional gatekeepers lose their power to control information, it becomes easier for self- appointed individual gatekeepers to step in. The common result is barbarous accusations and calls for an apology in response to online content. The authors…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    This language restricts government’s ability to constrain the speech of citizens, however, the prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Notwithstanding the often broad freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment, there are some historically rooted exceptions, as the Supreme Court has identified categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment and may be prohibited entirely. Among these categories are “fighting words” and words and actions that create an incitement of violence, both of which lay beyond the shield of First Amendment protection. I. Background In 1942, the United States Supreme Court established the “fighting words” doctrine by a 9-0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, where the Court held that fighting words “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case
    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Citizens United Case

    Wu, T. (2010). The Future of Free Speech. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57 (13), B4-B5.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speech Codes Threaten The Free Exchange Of Ideas On College Campuses
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Speech Codes Threaten The Free Exchange Of Ideas On College Campuses

    In the debate over whether speech codes should be enforced or not on university campuses, the opponents conclude that university’s should not enforce a hate speech code because it impedes academic freedom. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that it is a university’s responsibility to enforce hate speech code for an equal education opportunity. In this essay, I will conclude that hate speech should be regulated by a code enforced by the university because of the protection it offers. In the article titled, “Speech Codes Threaten the Free Exchange of Ideas on College Campuses” Eugene Volokh concludes that colleges should enforce a speech code.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    First Ten Amendments To The US Constitution
    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    First Ten Amendments To The US Constitution

    Whether it's through the internet or verbally conflicts occur and can end up in physical violence. People believe hate speech should be censored and prohibited from the 1st amendment. They believe that not everything you say should be protected by the first amendment. Advocates are concerned about the increase of incidents , threats , and potential hate crimes. With the first amendment being as lenient as it is on what we can say a lot of hate speech is…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper
    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech Should Be Covered Under The First Amendment Essay
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hate Speech Should Be Covered Under The First Amendment Essay

    If you were to ask many Americans whether hate speech was covered under the first amendment, many would be surprised to find out that in most circumstances it is protected. For the augment essay, I plan to argue that hate speech should be covered under the first amendment, and its coverage is essential to the idea of free speech.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Limitations
    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First Amendment Limitations

    We are a nation that has always been for the people and by the people. We are known as the land of opportunity because of the amount of job opportunities, our voting processes, and our unlimited amount of patriotic citizens. There would no longer be that passion and drive of the American people if there were limitations enforced on their right to freedom of speech. Our society and population density would slowly decline overtime as the people have less say because that’s what separates us from the rest of the world. If we don’t have that, we aren’t truly a land of opportunity. America is just equal to every other nation. Where the people follow strict laws and have little to no say in the government that rules the land they love. George Washington once stated: “If freedom of speech is taken away. Then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter” (Washington). Arguably, this is what occurs in North Korea today. However, while we strive so hard to keep this inalienable right, we must now recognize the complications created with the newest forum for freedom of speech – the Internet. While we strive to protect our basic right, we could very well lose the country we love so much if we don’t develop censorship means to stop the spreading propaganda and recruitment by such evil forces as ISIS. Censorship by targeting such accounts is a must in order for our very…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus

    Even though there has been a large increase in the number of hate speech codes in colleges and universities, the increase in the amount of hate speech incidents across the nation shows that these guidelines have be ineffective. Ben Wildavsky the author of “Rethinking Campus Speech Codes”, talks about how “campus wars over race and gender have hardly died down”, and that the “speech codes have done little to ease tension” (415). Hate speech codes attempt to create a safer more politically correct environment on college campuses by setting forth guidelines for students to follow, but they are failing miserably. The guidelines are so vague that “several major universities have been held unconstitutional”, for trying to write campus speech codes. For instance:
 In 1989, a federal judge overturned parts of the University of Michigan’s speech 
 code after a biopsychology graduate student said he feared the rules would prevent 
 him from discussing controversial theories about biological differences among the 
 sexes and races (Wildavsky 415). 
Making students follow the hate speech codes is a violation of their First Amendment which entitles…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dow Jones & Company Inc. V. Gutnick
    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Dow Jones & Company Inc. V. Gutnick

    It is for this very reason that it is imperative that jurisdictions form a concrete basis in how to determine matters of jurisdiction. It appears that whilst Dow Jones has helped Australia develop a common practice in determining jurisdiction based on the place of harm cause and not the place of publication, the constitutional right of free speech in the US is constantly battling the right to protect ones reputation. As much of the population of the US believes freedom of speech to be the most fundamental of all constitutional rights this view does not adequately represent the beliefs of an ever increasing multicultural internet user…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lack Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lack Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States

    I believe free speech is a part of America that makes it different and special than many other countries. It is something to be proud of and cherished, however not taken advantage of. It seems people are always toeing the line and seeing how far some laws can be pushed. As morally wrong as one may believe these things to be racism, sexism, and hate speech are permitted under free speech. I believe free speech should not be permitted no matter the consequences. I think speech that endangers others, and advocacy of violent political overthrow should not be allowed. Basically any type of speech that can lead to someone physically hurting themselves should be outlawed.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    first am
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    first am

    Firstly, we wanna live in a free society with the freedom to express personal views at any given time and in any given place in America. The first amendment right gives us the freedom to act and the freedom to believe what we are doing is right. We should be able to live in a society where we are challenged to think about topics and ideas, have open debates and access to information. Will Creeley said “We feel there is inherent value in having your most deeply held beliefs tested” (Warren,Oct. 2010). We cannot dismiss a person’s First Amendment rights just because we find his acts offensive. This is often extremely difficult for most of us to understand and accept. The best approach is to educate ourselves in order to create the opportunity to debate and sustain our believes. Should a group of Muslims be allowed to build a mosque on the hollowed ground of ground zero in New York City? Should a liquor store or strip club be approved to be build next to the mosque? Yes,and yes they should be able to freely express their opinions without putting society in physically harm ways. Free speech, free exercise of religion, and free press stays at foundation of this country.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics