Preview

Freedom of Speech: Should There be Restrictions on Speech in the U.S. Democracy?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
655 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech: Should There be Restrictions on Speech in the U.S. Democracy?
whats wrong with box colorwhats wrong with box colorwhats wrong with box color this is stupid I just want to look at something for one second so I can finish my homework ugh “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Many Americans rely on the First Amendment to protect their freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean that we can just go saying whatever we want whenever we want. Certain situations restrict what, when, and how you can say something, for example, if it puts anyone in immediate danger, is obscene in an inappropriate time or place, provokes someone, etc. Others still believe that they can and should be able to say anything they want at anytime that they want, but the question is: Should there be restrictions on speech in our democracy?
There are some people who believe that hate speech and other things like it should not be protected by the First Amendment due to the emotional distress that it could cause the victim. However, hate speech is an opinion no matter how they might express it, everyone has a right to express their opinion in any form that they so choose to. In 1770 a Philosopher named Voltaire wrote in a letter, “I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write.” in the Snyder v. Phelps case members of the Westboro Baptist Church protested at the funeral of Marine Lance Cpl. with derogatory signs against the troops. Snyder filed a lawsuit against the church on the grounds of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress on the family, and invasion of privacy. U.S. District Judge Richard Benedict compensated the family with $5 million dollars for damages. However, the Supreme Court concluded that the Westboro Baptist Church was not guilty and that their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Westboro Baptist Church Research Paper
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Westboro Baptist Church Research Paper

    Westboro Baptist Church members led by Fred Phelps believe that God hates the United States and punishes its citizens for its acceptance of homosexuality. To express their beliefs, the church members picket military and other funerals. Phelps’ group pickets by carrying signs and singing songs while standing on public property. Other groups have been formed to protest Phelps’ group. The church claims their speech is protected by the First Amendment Freedom of Speech Clause in the United States Constitution. I agree that the church has this right as does the group protesting Phelp’s group, and neither is violating the constitutional rights of others, even though I believe the actions of Westboro Baptist Church are appalling and depraved.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Snyder Vs Phelps Case Study
    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Snyder Vs Phelps Case Study

    Phelps places before us a choice where we must decide between the ethical values of basic respect versus the legal right of the First Amendment, freedom of speech. From an ethical perspective, it is easy to decide this case based upon the ideas that we adopted over time that all in all became a social norm. The ethical value of respect at a funeral will easily make someone choose the side of Snyder’s in this case just because over time we have established that funerals are meant to mourn and to pay respect to not only the fallen but also the family of that person. Although it may be interpreted that the reason that the Westboro Church chose to take action the way that they did was because it was necessary to get their point across, ethically it is frowned upon because of how we know funerals are supposed to take place. The Westboro Church had many options to establish the point that they were trying to get across such as the newspaper, TV, or the radio, but instead they chose to do it at a US Marine’s funeral which ended up working in their favor gaining them national recognition. Potter Stewart, a once US Justice wrote with regards to Ethics that, “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do." This quote explains the complete ethical aspect of this case because it describes how legally, the Westboro Church had every right to do what they did that day but ethically they were in the wrong intruding on the…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    46, 635 Too Many: Case Study
    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    46, 635 Too Many: Case Study

    On March 3, 2006, a twenty year old marine by the name of Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder was killed in a humvee accident in Al Anbar Province, Iraq. On the day of his sons funeral Albert Snyder, Matthew Snyder’s father, was greeted at the gate with picket signs saying, “Thank God for Dead Soldiers,” “Fags Doom Nations,” “America is Doomed,” “Priests Rape Boys,” and “You’re Going to Hell.” On March 2, 2011, now 5 years later the father of this fallen Marine has been ordered by the Supreme Court to pay the legal fees in the amount of $16,510.80 to the Westboro Baptist Church, the organization responsible for the picketing at Matthew Snyder’s funeral. The Supreme Court ruled that the Westboro Baptist Church’s protest at Snyder’s…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Roosevelt Differ From That Of Cooperative Federalism?
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Does Roosevelt Differ From That Of Cooperative Federalism?

    However, what many people do not necessarily know is that there are limits to our free speech and the supreme court has spoken on this topic for cases stating what would have to happen for these rights to be voided, “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action [emphasis added]” (WTP 123). Most of our rights have limits to them as it is for our protection and and the supreme court has a set of ways to be able to decide when our speech is no longer…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Snyder Vs Phelps Speech Analysis
    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Snyder Vs Phelps Speech Analysis

    The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shodanea Brown Media Law And Ethics
    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shodanea Brown Media Law And Ethics

    The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. A careful reading of the First Amendment reveals that it protects several basic liberties freedom i.e. religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Interpretation of the amendment is far from easy, as court case after court case has tried to define the limits of these freedoms. The prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Certain types of speech may be prohibited outright. Some types of speech may be more easily constrained than others. Furthermore, speech may be more easily regulated depending upon the location at which it takes place. All these rights protect the people of the US they have the right to religion and speech, they right to say whatever they want as long as it’s true without being held accountable for it. Even though speech is protected by the First Amendment not every speech is protected for example obscenity, child pornography, and speech that constitutes so-called “fighting words” or “true threats” are not protected by the amendment. There has always been controversy for defending the free speech rights of groups that spew hate, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis. But if only popular ideas were protected, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. If we do not come to the defense of the free speech rights of the most unpopular among us, even if their views are antithetical to the very freedom the First Amendment stands for, then no one's liberty will be secure. I can’t say I disagree with anything about these facts, I do agree that one should have freedom of speech everyone should feel free to express themselves by speaking but not everything should be said and that is why not every speech is protected by the amendment.…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A First Amendment Junkie Vs Kiddie Porn
    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A First Amendment Junkie Vs Kiddie Porn

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bastard: The First Amendment Of The United States Constitution
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bastard: The First Amendment Of The United States Constitution

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Where We Stand: Thirty Reasons For Loving Our Country
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Where We Stand: Thirty Reasons For Loving Our Country

    No right is truly unlimited journalist Roger Rosenblatt would argue. Author Rosenblatt narrates “everyone loves free expression as long as it isn’t exercised” (501) in “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead” as part from his essay collection titled Where We Stand: Thirty Reasons for Loving Our Country published in 2002. Rosenblatt informs his audience about the very controversial and objectionable value of freedom of expression, and what negative costs can ultimately stem from censoring language. Rosenblatt uses his credibility where he appeals to the every man/women reader’s emotions and logic criticizing any censorship on free expression, emphasizes the defending right on freedom of speech given by the Constitution. However, Rosenblatt includes many examples of the limitations placed on our free expression. Rosenblatt successfully engages…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Haac Pros And Cons
    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Haac Pros And Cons

    Free speech, more than any other of America’s values, has been the touchstone of American democracy dating back to the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment, created in 1791, is so important because “without our basic and essential rights established by that first amendment, the others amendments would have little to no meaning and hardly any force.” It shows the creativity and innovativeness of American democracy. The Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” However, almost from the moment the…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    The matter up for interpretation was whether or not the signs and comments from the Westboro Baptist Church were speaking on “matters of public concern.” They analyzed the content, form, and context of the speech to decide if it related to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community. The Supreme Court said that, because the picketers were on public land, adjacent to a public street, and the overall theme of their speech was related to broader public issues, Phelps and the other picketers were speaking on matters of public concern and were entitled to protection from the First Amendment. This was decided in an 8-1…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    swdsdsd
    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    swdsdsd

    2. The First Amendment grants each citizen the right to freely express him or herself as he or she chooses. This is not without restraint. Network television and radio have the right to censor offensive content. NBC will never show full-frontal nudity. WWNO will never broadcast “bad” words. There are also restrictions for the sake of public safety. One can be arrested for yelling “fire” in a crowded theater because the panicked reaction might cause injury or death. This kind of rule has also caused great debate on whether the instructions to…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Limitations
    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First Amendment Limitations

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Issue
    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    First Amendment Issue

    Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of The First Amendment
    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Importance Of The First Amendment

    Because the First Amendment has such strong language, we begin with the presumption that speech is protected. Over the years, the courts have decided that a few other public interests — for example, national security, justice or personal safety — override freedom of speech. There are no simple rules for determining when speech should be limited, but there are some general tests that help.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics