Preview

French Constitutional Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
50080 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
French Constitutional Law
BEIJING /

18 HEURES DU LUNDI 23 AU SAMEDI 28

French constitutional law

For your reference, below are the topics that have been covered in the past three years. They serve only as rough guideline, which you can certainly adapt to your own preferences. 1. Origins and Historical Developments of Constitutionalism. Theories of sovereignty 2. Parliamentary Democracy and Separation of Powers 3. Judicial Review and Methods of Constitutional Interpretation 4. Fundamental Rights 5. Central-local Relation, Local Autonomy. Relations with European Union 6. Political Parties and Elections 6 sessions of 3 hours each 1. Origins and Historical Developments of Constitutionalism. a. The concept of a constitution in the 18th century b. The constitution of 1791 i. Separation of powers ii. Theories of sovereignty iii. Representation iv. The problem of the executive v. The judiciary and the duality of court systems vi. The short life of the constitution c. The constitution of 1793 d. The constitution of 1795 2. Parliamentary democracy a. History i. The constitutional monarchy 1814-1848 ii. The third republic : 1875-1939 iii. The fourth republic : 1946-1958 iv. The creation of the fifth republic b. The fifth republic I i. The president ii. The Prime Minister and the other ministers 3. Parliamentary democracy II. The fifth republic II i. Parliament and parties 1. Elections 2. Political parties ii. Two modes of functioning, concordance of majorities and cohabitation iii. The judiciary today 4. Judicial review a. History. i. Why there was no judicial review ii. The Constitutional council in 1958 iii. 1971 iv. 1974 1

v. 1975 and the two judicial reviews vi. 2008 the priority ruling on the issue of constitutionality b. organization and procedures i. organization of the Constitutional council ii. procedure c. the jurisprudence of the Constitutional council i. the sources of constitutional law : the block of constitutionality ii. the Constitutional council’s own jurisdiction 1.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comm 393 Case Briefs

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages

    1. CFAO 20-53 was not the reason that Liebmann was not permitted to serve in the Persian Gulf and was not in effect when the decision not to give him the position was made. CFAO 20-53 was not relevant to the action before the court and thus should not be considered.…

    • 12766 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Riley vs Standard Oil

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Holding of this court (i.e., the one cited in 1. above) (how did the court answer the issue---YES OR NO-- resulting in what ruling---affirmed, reversed, remanded????)):…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Knowing and just being aware of ones right could be essential for the public. One has to know the basic differences between a probable cause and reasonable suspicion. An encounter with an officer and a possible violation of the law it helps to know the cause so one can be prepared for a possible defense strategy. Warrants have certain requirements and exceptions’, knowing each one is vital. The Sixth Amendment is always used in trials and having knowledge of this amendment is important.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The omission of the judicial review power in the US constitution in the text has triggered a huge debate from the diverse fronts. It is imperative to comprehend that the United States constitution makers, despite not incorporating the judicial review power in text form in the US constitution; they actually implied the judicial review power in the constitution. This implies that this power is not direct but rather implied and ought to be practiced. The United States` Supremacy Clause contained in the constitution sensitively states that there exists a judicial review form. This clause states that the US constitution as well as the United States laws that will be passed in accordance thereof; together with all the treaties that shall be signed…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two prevalent monarchies in early European governments were absolutism and constitutionalist. They each have vast and numerous differences, but also share some common factors. These differences include, the amount of power the king holds in the government, the amount of power the subjects hold, and the emphasis on armies. While there are many differences there are some common factors such as; the kings retained the overall power, both monarchs had their nation’s best interest at heart, and both wanted to progress and strengthen their nation as much as possible using different ways.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    IN 1685 Louis XIV formally revoked the Edict of Nantes because he viewed it as an affront to his own claims to power.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The aim of this presentation is to demonstrate how the European Union Impacts the English legal system and goes on to identify the advantages and drawbacks of the Judicial Precedent.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton focuses on three subjects in this paper. First, the process of appointing judges. Second, the tenure which they are to hold their places. Lastly, the judiciary authority among different courts and their relationship (Hamilton p.1). This paper examines the justification for their tenure, meaning the appointment for life under a good behavior. Once comparing the three branches, Hamilton discusses the judiciary as the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution because it does not have the force or the will (Hamilton p.2). He explains force as decisions made by the court that can only be implemented by the executive branch. Will is the fact that courts are not able to interpret the law according to their desires or political views. By making this comparison, Hamilton makes the first important point in this paper, the terms of office should be appointed to life to protect the judiciary from the other stronger branches of government (Hamilton p.2). His second point is regarding the limited constitution that gives enumerated powers to the federal government.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    se abla espanol

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please provide full and complete responses to the following questions. Your answers should demonstrate your full knowledge and understanding of the material presented.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The supreme court choices cases based on their potential impact on the constitutional law and the…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Currie, D. (1992), the Constitution in the Supreme Court: The First Hundred Years, 1789-1988, Pges152-155 (Univ. of Chicago).…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mckeever, Robert J. The United States Supreme Court: A political and Legal Analysis. New York and Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    questions for final exam

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9. Explain the 2 senses of “moral” according to Dworkin. How does he use the distinction to criticize Devlin?…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays