Preview

French Revolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
French Revolution
Position Paper
The French Revolution is the revolution in France against the Bourbons third. The French Revolution happened especially because of the third estates, which were more than 95% of people in France. they were also the poor people that did not have enough money, and on top of this they had to pay taxes, and pay for everything. Meanwhile, the nobles and wealthy people had so much money and owned lands, but did not have to pay for taxes. The people were divided into 3 estates, first estate that were the wealthy and nobles” didn’t need to pay taxes”. Second estate, which were the middle class people that didn’t have money but didn’t have to pay for taxes too, and third estate that were the very poor people that had to pay for everything including taxes, and were the hardest working of all.

The people were divided into 3 estates, first estates that were the wealthy people and nobles that had lands. Second estate, the middle class people that had land and a job, but didn’t have money, and didn’t have to pay for taxes. Third estate, that were the most hard working, but poor people that had to pay for taxes. Louis XVI was the king of France, he did not care about people and was always travelling to Versailles for parties, even when they were in a bad situation, one example is bankruptcy. Marie Antoinette was the wife of Louis XVI. Women’s that March on Versailles in order to get captures to use against “blackmail”, they were important because they captured the king and queen.
Louis XVI could have prevented the French revolution, if he changed some laws and made it fair, also if he cared. The 3 estates all wanted to have a estates meeting in order to solve their problems. The first estate did not care much, because they had everything “owned land, and didn’t need to pay taxes”. The real change needed to happen for the third estate, because they are the ones that don’t have anything and are 95% of France, and also they are the most hardworking. The biggest

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He collected taxes without the consent of the estates general in order establish many things, fund a series of wars, build a bigger and stronger military and to build his palace, the Palace of Versailles, when it was built he insisted that the nobles spend more time there (Doc 2). This eventually led the nobles into debt because they spent most of their time and money at the Palace of Versailles. The nobles being in debt meant that they lost status and power, which ultimately fed the basis for the French Revolution. Document 3 states; “The aftermath of the revocation was disastrous for France. Many of those who abjured [gave up] their Protestant religion repented of their weakness.”(Doc 3) This demonstrates that the removal of the Edict of Nantes drove people insane because it granted the people France substantial rights, however when the rights were removed by Louis XIV people became infuriated, which is another reason to why the French Revolution occurred. Fundamentally, the actions that Louis XIV took had a great impact towards his people. His actions ultimately led the people of France initiate the French Revolution, which left France and its people at a vulnerable…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Louis XVI was opposed to the 3rd Estates perspective of the situation. He believed he could repay his debt with heavy tax increases, Nobility and Clergy also…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were numerous causes to justify The French Revolution. There existed problems inside France’s government, society, and economy. Most of these problems were ultimately experienced by the third estate, or the middle class. The third estate was then educated on a better way to live by the results of the Enlightenment philosophers and their philosophies. Certain conditions also led to the revolution, on top of its causes. Living conditions and representation in government are two examples. It is undeniable that the people of the third estate were correct in their campaign for change.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ French Revolution

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Louis XVI ignored the demands of the Third Estate. When the Third Estate wanted to form the National Assembly, this exposed Kind Louis XIV's abuse of power. The Estates General was unfair due to the Third Estates constantly being outvoting by the first and second estates. This resulted in the Tennis Court Oath which said they wouldn't give up. Instead, the people of the Third Estate turned to rioting like when they stormed the Bastille to free political prisoners.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780s, France had a monarchy with 3 different social classes called estates. The First Estate consisted of the clergy. They owned 10% of the land when they were only 1% of the population. The Second Estate had the nobles, and they owned 20% of the land and paid no tax. Nobles counted for 2% of the population leaving the other 97% to the Third Estate. The Third Estate paid high taxes and lacked privileges. Half of their income was used to pay their taxes and they were starving due to the high bread cost. While the Third Estate was suffering, King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette threw extravagant parties and borrowed money to help with the American Revolution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oka Conflict Analysis

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the people or the nation disagree, or when their nationalist loyalties lead them to pursue contending goals, an attitude of reconciliation can bring them together and enable them to coexist in peace. But when two contending loyalties cannot achieve reconciliation, the outcome can be serious. The inability to resolve the differences may lead to damaging political struggles and even outright war. The French Revolution is an example of the conflicts that can occur due to the divisions of social classes. The French society was divided into three estates of the Ancien Regime: the First Estate (the Roman Catholic clergy), the Second Estate (the nobility), and the Third Estate (serfs and the rest of population). By the 18th century, the bourgeoisie, the middle class who earned wealth through trade, demanded a change to the ancien regime due to the increase of education and literacy. The bourgeoisie were unsatisfied with the economic, legal, and political limitations imposed on them and wanted a change to the outdated political structure, they wanted a voice that is more closely reflected on their numbers. When the government were unable to agree on a solution, many people were beginning to question the absolute power of the monarchy. The king, Louis XVI, called the representatives of the three estates to discuss political change, but little was settled during these meetings, due to the…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution - 1

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many issues that led up to the French Revolution. For example, the unfair tax burden. According to Document two, the Third Estate paid all of the government taxes. There were three estates. The 1st estate was all of the clergy; they had wealth because they collected taxes from the 3rd estate and they also owned land. They had power, food, liberty, and freedom. The 2nd estate was the rich titled nobility. They derived their wealth from land ownership, and they collected some taxes. They also had power, food, and freedom. The 3rd estate was separated into three different classes. The Bourgeoisie was the highest of the third estate; they had cash wealth since they were made up of the merchants, bankers, and artisans. The Bourgeoisie paid very high taxes, and had very little power, they had a food supply, but they had no power. The peasant farmers, and the city workers had no wealth, power, or liberty, and they had to pay taxes. The 1st and 2nd estate only took up about 3% of the population. The Bourgeoisie thought that the taxes were unfair to the entire 3rd estate. Document three explained how a peasant had 7 children, and couldn’t support her family, but she still had to pay taxes. This shows how unfair the tax burden was.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the seventeen hundreds, before the revolution had begun, France’s political system, social structure, and religious ideas were slightly changing. Louis XVI took the throne in 1774 with his wife, Marie Antoinette and the people’s hope that he was going to revive his country. While the king and queen were living their luxurious life, were not in touch with the suffering and misery of the peasantry. Louis got involved in the American Revolution by sending aid, which had the effect of putting France into more debt. After this, The Estates General’s power rested with the first and the second estates and times for the peasants were bad as Arthur Young, an English writer on agriculture, economics, and social statistics, points out in his Plight of the French Peasants. They were working in harsh conditions, paying heavy taxes, and they only had one vote in the Estates General. The bourgeoisie longed for equality amongst all citizens in society and so they asked for another vote. The…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The start of the French Revolution was directly in French society. Society was constantly dominated by nobles, or a social group that was primarily made up of: aristocrats, officeholders, professionals, merchants and businessmen. The French society was broken up into three social classes, or better known as “Estates.”. The First Estate was comprised of all the clergy; the Second Estate was comprised of the nobility, and the Third Estate was comprised of everyone else, including wealthy lawyers, businessmen, urban laborers and poor peasants. The Third Estate was by far the largest social class. All of these classes had one thing in common, and that was a want for an economy that would serve their interests. The nobility depended on a constant infusion of talent and economic power form the wealthy social groups represented in the Third Estate. Less prosperous lawyers were jealous of the privileged position very few had in their profession. Over the course of the century the price of offices rose, making it more difficult to buy one’s way into nobility, and creating tensions between middling members of the Third Estate and the very rich in trade and commerce who were the only group able to afford to climb the social ladder. Several fault lines ran through the elite and the middle classes which led to resentment of the government and a need for change.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third estate was the most mistreated group out of everyone. They had no rights to anything even though they were half the population of France. People in the third estate paid all of the taxes that were owed to the government while the first and second estate paid nothing at all because they were higher than everyone. A quote from Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution says “The Third Estate is the People and the People is the foundation of the State; it is in fact the State itself; the other estates are merely political categories while by the immutable (unchangeable) laws of nature the People is everything. Everything should be subordinated (inferior) to it...…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Causes

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages

    France’s social structure was an aspect of society that majority of the French were greatly displeasured about. The social structure was very unbalanced during the Old Regime. The majority of the Third Estate third estate was going hungry and only as time went on poverty kept increasing. It was also clear that as time went on that the nobles and the clergy were only seeking more privileges than what they already had. As if the Third Estate couldn't have any more burdens put on their lives, there was also a food shortage occurring that would completely shock the whole nation. The harvest season the year before was so “disastrous” that it’s effects were greatly “felt” and because of that bread prices quickly rose (Price 77). When that occurred, the poverty stricken people had a difficult time trying to provide for themselves along with their families. This enraged the Third Estate because while they were suffering horribly, the First and Second estates were living luxuriously and were able to afford the sky rocketing food prices. From there, the angered civilians had enough reasons to act out and because of that they lashed out against the higher ups. "The third estate seemed intent not just on removing fiscal inequality, but on undermining the entire social order” (Price 60). The Third Estate felt very strong about how they have been mistreated…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The estates general meeting was a huge opportunity for the poorest people of the third estate to be heard by the king. The double representation was seen as a huge victory and a hope for a change was growing. On the first days of the meeting, they brought cahiers, the King and his delegates announced the principles of the meeting and the Third Estate discovered that the double representation was in fact a sham. It was decided that the votes will be hold by orders, 1 vote for each estate and not by head. The double representation was a fallacy. Louis XVI and his advisors focused on a complete overhaul of the French tax system. They exposed their view while the only preoccupation of the Third Estate was to talk about their representation. The only solution to the financial crisis was to make all us people of France pay the taxes because of the deficit spending, no matter what estate they were from. At the time, only us the third estate was subject to the taxes. The Nobility was taking care of the lands and the Clergy was responsible of the people's education. Their argument was that their action was a huge benefit to society and should therefore be exempt from paying taxes. But obviously, the King's decision was heavily rejected by the Nobility. Louis XVI faced a huge resistance from his own group who wouldn't accept any loss of wealth or power. He was heavily criticized by the Nobility who pictured him as a stupid, nerdy man with a way of governing the country that was full of nonsense.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XVI had the power to make laws and know one could say nothing about it. France’s society was all but great, it was divided into classes. The highest class was the government leaders, they lived a comfortable and fancy life making a good income. The middle class was made up of merchants and business owners they lived a well life with an o.k. income. The worst class was the poor farmers and servants.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    French Revolution

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Go up to the white board and indicate whether you think the following are True or False.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Louis XV did not leave France in an easy state for Louis XVI to control. This made it very difficult for Louis XVI to come into power at a young age and attend to the failures that were left behind. Louis XVI lacked leadership skills and had no idea as to how to act like a king. He did not have the right character to strive for a absolute monarchy. The government too played a role in the revolution, as they were not very effective, along with the parlement who made it very difficult to introduce reforms and implement ways in which the society's problems can be saved. These action led to the economy to fall as no actions of the government were taken. Too funding of the American war was a problem that arose as Louis XVI gave his soldiers a false belief. Marie Antoinette might have contributed with the spending as she spent money on dresses, jewelry, nut mostly her garden which were world class and always looking immaculate. Therefore King Louis XVI was not solely to blame however, he did play a major role, as he was the one who provoked the revolt with his luxuries lifestyle and the tax system inevitably led to the fall of the society that was…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays