Preview

Frued vs Marx

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2180 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frued vs Marx
Freud and Marx
Marx and Freud both discussed the issues surrounding civilization, communism and freedom. The philosophers at times agree, and at other times disagree regarding the reasons for civilization, but for the most part, their ideas regarding liberty complement each other.
Freud believes that man is innately aggressive, whereas Marx believes that men are naturally good. This difference in beliefs is the basis for their differing points of view about civilization. Both philosophers believe that man is complex, as is displayed in his ability to perform high-order thinking skills. Further, both argue that under certain conditions in modern society, liberty is restricted and man is unable to live a full life. While Freud and Marx differ in their beliefs of why this occurs, both find that the loss of man's individuality and self is of significant concern, and thus base their philosophies on this dilemma.
Marx believes that man is naturally good, but the ownership of property has brought about aggression and selfishness. In other words, over time private property and money have corrupted man. Marx points out that throughout history, classes have existed, but were based on "feudal, patriarchal, and idyllic relations." Tradition and family relations determine a person's class. In the capitalistic society, however, only the ownership of property, the "naked self-interest… cash payment," determines one's class. Marx describes the continuous conflict as an ongoing trend of class struggles. When many take a look at society they notice that with in classes there's always the oppressors and oppressed in continuous hostility towards each other. However, when this phenomenon ends it is normally a rebellious way.
Marx describes the two classes into which people are divided: the bourgeoisie and proletariats. The bourgeoisie are the property owners and the proletariats those property-less people who must sell their services for a living, also called

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today in society as many people know there are many ways to categorize people into different “social classes.” There has been many people who have tried and had labels for people in each “social class.” However, Karl Marx and Max Weber are well known in sociology classes for having certain criteria to classify people into their classes. We see that Both Marx and Weber has offered theoretical descriptions of how people are stratified into “social classes.”…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx believed that society is based upon a conflict between Bourgeoisies (Ruling class, Upper class) and Proletariat (Working class). Marx believed that the ruling class were exploiting the working class.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As described in the Communist Manifesto, there was a division of classes that were between the proletariats that were the wageworkers and were used for labor purposes, and the bourgeoisie who were considered the capitalist class and the ones who were at fault for exploitation of the proletariats. The writing in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, after many years has a form in which it resonates in contemporary society. Having different types of social and working classes has become more relevant throughout society and has caused for issues to arise. Although the ways they are perceived and named have changed throughout the years in different locations, the existence of these classes is still consistent throughout. There…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    “A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of Communism.”1, the opening sentence to The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Frederich Engels. Karl Marx was a German philosopher, journalist and revolutionary socialist whose famous works include The Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital. Historians have largely credited Marx’s works for influencing the key figures that went on to lead the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution took place in 1917 and disassembled the Tsarist monarchy, preparing for the creation of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, commonly referred to as the Soviet Union or USSR. Although there were many factors that contributed to the Russian Revolution of 1917, Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that all humans were radical and that this directly influenced their organization of government. Similarly, to Locke, Marx classified society into two groups; The Bourgeois and The Proletarians. Marx believed that a ruling class was inevitable, “we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold of gradation of social ranks,” (Marx 9). All though, Marx sees no way to exist without social ranks, he also believes that in this case the bourgeois will join the proletarians in living a good life, “a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologists,” (Marx…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By eliminating the gap between rich and poor, Marx believes Communism should replace the economic system of Capitalism. In his perspective, he claims, “They have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite” (Marx 476). Because he sees the Capitalist system exploits workers who are unfairly treated, he asserts that the proletarians should become the ruling class. The principle of Communism is the ideology of collectivism. Marx states, “Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society: all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation” (470). This means that no private property should be allowed, and no one has even a less or more power in a Communist society. Because Marx illustrates the property ownership would enhance greed, and ambition to win in the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx in Soho

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx was regarded as the father of communism. He criticized the dominant form of government during his time which was capitalism. Capitalism encourages competition among the people and gives rewards unequally. He argued that capitalist nations allowed the few wealthy people to amass a great fortune while the masses seemed to work harder with little reward for their efforts (Ebrey et. al., 2005). The rich kept the resources for themselves, often denying the poor of an equal opportunity.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Marxist theory of class shows that the class a person belongs to is a fundamental part of their identity. For Marx, society generated two main classes, a capital-owning class and a property less class. They called these the ruling class and the working class or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Class is rooted in the economic organization of production i.e. those groups who own factories, farms, coal mines or raw materials. These groups look after their own interests, live in similar surroundings and send their children to similar schools. Marx believed that class consciousness is particularly important to our understanding of identity. This is an awareness of a shared class interest and the existence of classes with opposing interests. Class consciousness would emerge through solidarity and collective action. For Marx, the key factor is private ownership of economic resources.…

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After intensive analyzation of reading Civilization and It’s Discontents by Sigmund Freud and Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche, I feel as if both Freud and Nietzsche offered virtually identical views of human nature and of the society in which they lived. In my paper I intend to prove how this is so.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this book, Freud argues the contradicting natures of civilization vs. the nature of human desires. He argues that it is hard to have an organized society and still act upon our human instincts to the fullest. By introducing the concept of happiness and how it can be achieved, Freud basically says cannot achieve happiness and still function in a civilized society. This is due to a variety of factors that shall be discussed. As for the consequences of this unreal reality, it is constant dissatisfaction and not attaining the ultimate goal of life: happiness. To simplify this complex issue, Freud starts by defining the nature of human beings.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud's opinion that it is not natural for us to confine out sexuality to one man or one woman may be accurate, but if society ignored this law we would lose order. Also, Freud argues that society will be happier and healthier if they yield to their desires; but how can one attain happiness when they are overwhelmed with guilt. Perhaps society is to blame for our guilty consciousnesses, but Freud cannot forget that people do not only fear society, they fear God as well.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke Vs Karl Marx

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    John Locke and Karl Marx are two people who influenced our everyday lives immensely, yet have very conflicting ideas. In an attempt to change people's thinking about monarchical societies, John Locke conveys that individualism and limited political power are the best options, and explains that in his famous Two Treatises of Civil Government. Marx chooses to believe a quite different philosophy, about which is named Marxism. He explains these ideas, with the assistance of Fredrick Engels, in his Communist Manifesto. While both ideas are very present in modern society and governments, the system that is more reliable and consistent for running a government belongs to John Locke because of his beliefs for rights we are born with as humans and…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both men challenged society, but were not cowed by those that would oppose them, which allowed them to become essential cogs in the machine ensuring Europe’s own evolution on a large scale. Social darwinism, an offshoot of Darwin’s theory of evolution, became the backbone of new imperialism, and Freud’s method of psychoanalysis and his view of the mind would become the basis of mental health in Europe, and eventually the whole of the western world. If these men had not challenged tradition and gone on to blaze new discoveries in their fields, Europe would not be Europe as it is…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beyond typical philosophers solely focused on acquiring knowledge, Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche were equally dedicated to actualizing their vision of a better society and way of life. Before our present state of modernism, Nietzsche and Marx were already prophesizing our societal flaws based on past wrongs done to humanity. The Spanish Inquisition, the African Slave Trade, and the Holocaust are all clear testaments to the detrimental effect that separatism and alienation have on all humans alike. Marx and Nietzsche voice the changes that need to be made in order for humanity to finally push itself another crucial step closer to equality and freedom.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    is interesting to note that both Freud and Marx saw conflict but each traced it…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays