Full Inclusion Case Study

When It was proposed that full inclusion of children with disabilities is a civil right, it makes one want to research the topic more by going through the various websites and reading what human rights advocates were discussing. The Learning Disabilities Association of America were quoted as saying “that they do not support ‘full inclusion’ or any policies that mandate the same placement, instruction, or treatment for ALL students with learning disabilities.” There are no two disabilities that are the same. As noted in the case of Clyde K. and Sheila K. v. Puyallup School District (1994), the student was diagnosed with Tourette’s along with ADHD. The student was placed in a full inclusion classroom setting, in which the student injured several
The child would spend half the day with able-bodied students and the other half of the day within the special education program. After several months had passed the Pre-kindergarten teacher decided it was not in Daniel’s best interest to continue in her classroom. She stated that he was not retaining nor learning any of the curriculum even when she simplified it for him. The court system agreed with the teacher. After reviewing several other cases and comparing them to the rules and guidelines in the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) which states that all students are given the right to a free public education in the least restrictive environment. If it means a child with a disability does not thrive and or make any progress in a classroom full of able bodied students, the child should be re-evaluated to see what will fit the child’s best needs. Every parent wants what is best for their own child, but many parents see their child through blinders. Many times a parent can only see what they want to see and need a person who wants what’s best for any child and has a non-bias opinion to also be part of the evaluation
Board of Education where it was decided that racial segregation in schools was deemed unconstitutional. The road leading up to this case took some very brave souls to fight the system. The road began in 1909 with the establishment of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). This organization fought for racial equality. Next, came the case of Murray Vs. Maryland (1936) in which Donald Gaines Murray was rejected from being accepted due being his race, once he won his case it only catapulted to more and more court cases, it gave you Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada (1938), Sweat v. Painter (1950) and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education (1950) all of these cases brought us closer to Brown vs. Board of Education. When looking at all these cases and to see where we started to how far we have come, it pulls all these cases together. It shows that everyone has a right to equality in the public