Assess the view of functionalists that religion serves to reinforce social integration.
Functionalists see society as like an organism, with basic needs that it must meet to survive. They suggest that each institution performs certain functions to maintain the social system by meeting a need. Society’s most basic need is for social order and solidarity as they believes social solidarity is necessary for society to hold together as without it, individual selfishness would cause social disintegration. For functionalist, what makes order possible is value consensus – a set of shared norms and values for people to follow. Durkheim argues that religious institutions play a central part in creating and maintaining value consensus, order and solidarity.
For Durkheim, the key feature of all religions is a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane. The sacred are things set apart and forbidden, inspiring feelings of awe fear and wonder, with taboos and prohibitions. (For example: in Christianity the cross of Christ is seen as sacred). The profane are ordinary things that have no special significance like a street light. It is believed that a religion is more than a set of beliefs: it has sacred rituals or practices and these rituals are collective – performed by social groups. Durkheim argues that sacred things create powerful feelings in believers because they are symbols representing something of great power, and this thing can only be society. Also for Durkheim sacred symbols perform the essential function of uniting believers into a single moral community as believed that when people worship sacred symbols, they are worshipping society itself. Durkheim believed the essence of all religion could be found by studying its simplest form, in the simplest type of society. Thus he used studies of the of the Arunta, an aboriginal Australian tribe with a clan system; among the Arunta, bands of kin come together to perform ritual worship of a sacred totem. The totem is the clans emblem, such as an animal or plant that symbolises the clans identity, the totemic rituals venerating it reinforce the groups solidarity and sense of belonging. For Durkheim, when clan members worship their totem, they are in reality worshipping society – the totem inspires awe in the clan’s members precisely because it represents the power of the group. However Durkheim did not carry out any research on the Arunta himself, all his information came from secondary sources. Furthermore, religion in the simplest society may not be the same as religion in other societies.
For Durkheim, the sacred symbols represent society’s collective conscience or consciousness – the shared norms, values and beliefs that make cooperation between individuals possible. Without these, society would disintegrate. Suggest that regular shared religious rituals rein force the collective conscience and maintain social integration and maintain social integration. Also rituals remind individuals of the power of society –without which they themselves are nothing, and to which they owe everything thus religions also performs an important function for the individual by making us feel part of something greater than ourselves, it strengthens us to face life’s problems .
Durkheim sees religion as also being the source of our cognitive capacities – our ability to reason and think conceptually. In order to think at all, we need categories such as time. Religion provides the concepts and categories we need for understanding the world and communicating with others. Durkheim and mauss argue that religion provides basic categories such as time, space and causation –e.g with ideas about a creator bringing the world into being at the beginning of time. For Durkheim, religion is the origin of human thought, reason and science. Malinowski argues that religion promotes solidarity by performing psychological functions for individuals, helping them cope with emotional stress that would undermine social solidarity. There are two situations where it performs this role: where the outcome is important but uncontrollable and uncertain. In his study of the trobriand islanders, Malinowski contrast lagoon and ocean fishing. Lagoon fishing is safe but ocean fishing is dangerous and uncertain, so it is always accompanied by canoe magic – rituals to ensure a safe expeditions. This gives people a sense of control. Which eases tension gives them confidence to undertake hazardous tasks and reinforce group solidarity. Another situation is at times of crises such as events as birth, puberty; marriage and death are potentially disruptive change. Malinowski argues that death is the main reason for the existence of religious belief.
Parsons identifies two other essential functions of religion in modern society: as it creates and legitimates society’s basic norms and values by sacralising them (making them sacred). This promotes value consensus and social stability. Also that it provides a source of meaning, answering ultimate questions about life, eg why good people suffer. These may undermine our commitment to society’s values. By answering such questions, religion helps people to adjust to adverse events and maintain stability. Bellah argues that religion unifies society, especially a multi faith society like America. What unifies American society is an overarching civil religion – a belief system that attaches sacred qualities to society itself. Civil religion is a faith in the America way of life. Civil religion integrates society, in a way that individual religion cannot. American civil religion involves loyalty to the nation state and belief in god, both of which are equated with being a true American. It is expressed in various rituals, symbols and beliefs eg the pledge of allegiance to the flag. It sacrifices the American way of life and bids together American from many different ethnic and religious backgrounds.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
As previously mentioned, functionalists argue that social order and solidarity to run smoothly – Durkheim argued that there are four main ways in which religion maintains value consensus. One way is through the sacred and profane, he argued that sacred referred to things that are separate from society and create feelings of awe, wonder and fear whereas profane referred to things that were inferior with no real significance. Durkheim therefore argued that the only thing powerful enough to inspire people in the way religion does is society itself therefore meaning people are not worshipping their religion or god, but in fact society – this means that people unite under the same belief, spreading shared norms and values all over and therefore creating consensus within society.…
- 974 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A central part of religion is response to and interaction with the supernatural or sacred. Through the understanding of the key doctrines and ethics of the religion, as contained in the sacred texts believers are able to give expression to their understanding of the divine. This element is the ritualistic dimension of religion. The believers of that religion, by partaking in worship, teaching, and prayers give expression to and…
- 330 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that religion is a force for social change
Functionalists claim that religion acts as a conservative force by promoting integration and social solidarity. Durkheim states that religion does this by totem worship; worship of a sacred object which symbolises the group itself, who by worshipping their totem are worshipping their society. Most religions have collective worship with rituals which lead to social solidarity being heightened. Durkheim proposes that Gods are society’s expression of their collective conscience which are the shared beliefs, values and traditions which make a…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Durkheim researched into the Aborigines in Australia in 1912. The native Australians, believed in Totemism, the belief in worshipping objects with divine properties, such as plants and animals. The Australian aborigines carried out many religious ceremonies to worship their totem, which is an example of collective consciousness securing social solidarity as the tribe were brought together to worship as a group. Durkheim definition of religion was split into two parts: the Sacred, which consisted of all things Holy or spiritual, and the Profane, the ordinary things. The Aborigines’ ultimate holy object which also was seen as a place of worship was the Ayres Rock. Durkheim found that the Aborigines were divided into several clans, and each clan worshipped their designated totem, which performed as their God. Durkheim argued that having religion provided a set of moral beliefs which shapes collective conscience within society.…
- 2524 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Functionalism sees society as a system, that it is a set of interconnected parts which can work together in unison to form a whole. The early functionalists drew an analogy between society and an organism, i.e, the human body. They said that an understanding of an organ of the body involves understanding its relationship with every other organ and its contribution to the organism as a whole; therefore they said that this could also describe society, that every part requires its own analysis to see what it contributes to the society as whole. Functionalists have also continued this argument to say that just like an organ has simple basic needs to survive, so does society, and that if one part fails it will all diminish. Thus social institutions such as the family and religion are analysed as a part of the social order rather than isolated units. Functionalist analysis has focused on the question of how social systems are maintained. With the functionalist concern for investigating on how functional prerequisites (basic needs or necessities of existence) are met. This emphasis has resulted in many institutions being seen as beneficial and useful to society. But this view has led critics to argue that functionalism has a built-in conservative bias which supports the status quo. Within society the functionalists outline what they call functional prerequisites, these are what society requires in order to exist. Some functionalists believe that these prerequisites are institutions such as family or social stratification. They are easily identified in every type of society even though they can vary, like the caste system in India varies a great deal from our own stratification system but affects the whole society and makes it functional which fits their definition of a prerequisite. This view is held by sociologists such as Davies and Moore (1967) and Murdock (1949). However…
- 2803 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Religion has held an important role in society since the beginning of civilisation and it has such power over people’s minds and shape the way our world developed. Whilst some sociological theories such as functionalist sees religion as performing a positive function in society as it can lead to social solidarity, integrating people into society, other sociological theories such as Marxist and Feminist totally disagrees with this and would argue that religion leads to instability and conflict in society.…
- 1094 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
* Functional definitions of religion defines religion in terms of the social or psychological functions it performs for individuals or society.…
- 270 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The term “religiosity” was used by social scientists in order to indicate the extent, commitment, devotion and faithfulness of a person’s participation and practice of his or her religion (Gay and Lynxwiler, 2013). According to Ayenibiowo and Ayeni (2013), religiosity, in its narrowest sense, deals more with how religious an individual is and less with how religious an individual in terms of ritual, symbols and doctrines. On the other hand, religiosity, in its broadest sense, is a multifaceted construct pertaining to various religious activities, devotions and beliefs.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The question of the existence of a divine being, a cosmic higher, is troublesome not only to answer, but the formulation of it to start with. It seems an impossible task to attempt at answering a question which isn’t fully formed, or one that doesn’t exactly convey what we are trying to express. In his essay ‘Religion as the Inexpressible’, Thomas McPherson categorises religion to the ‘sphere of the unsayable’, arguing that this is a natural result of trying to put inexpressible experiences into words. So how come we still rely on religion for answers, if religion itself cannot be explained, reasoned, or justified?…
- 1103 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In modern society there are many things that can be elevated to the status of sacred. Society takes many of these symbols that can be profane and turn them into sacred symbols in the right context. In Durkheim’s The Elementary…
- 1657 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Functionalism has a macro-structural approach to society. It looks at society as a whole and is known as a consensus perspective i.e. everyone agrees on social norms and values and people work together to maintain society. These norms and values are learned by social institutions such as the family, education, media, religion, law and work. Functionalists believe society is arranged similar to the human body and its vital organs. If one should malfunction, then the others will be affected. This organic analogy keeps society functioning and these institutions have functional dependency on each other. These ideas go back to Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), the French sociologist who is considered to be the founding father of functionalist sociology and whose writings form the basis for the functionalist theory(McClelland 2000).…
- 2075 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In essence, this means that people regard as unimportant the social expectations to respect the rights and the needs of others and prefer to look after their own interests even at their neighbours expense. They return to their natural state of greed and self-interest. For society his heralds the long term collapse of order and harmony. Anomie, then, is dangerous and harmful to all. The Ways in Which Society can Reaffirm their Values and Ensure Social Cohesion There are a number of ways in which societies reaffirm their values and ensure continuing social cohesion. The most obvious ways include.... Education: the teaching of a common language, history, social studies etc. Religion: through the process of collective worship of a common God. At first sight it seems strange that some functionalists should argue that deviance is a necessary part of all societies, and that it performs positive functions for the social system. After all deviance break the norms and values of society. With the functionalists emphasis on the importance of shared norms and values as the basis of social order it would appear that deviance is a threat to social order, and therefore should be seen as a threat to society. All functionalists agree those social control mechanisms such as the police and the courts Other important writers who take a Functionalist perspective…
- 3090 Words
- 13 Pages
Better Essays -
A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…
- 1387 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
His theory was functionalistic; he wasn’t concerned with the content of religion but with what it does, or its function. Durkheim studied an aboriginal tribal society to find out what is common to all religions. He also studied totenism. A totem is a symbol or emblem of the clan, individual members of the clan gather together to worship the totem. By doing this they are worshipping their own society. They do this by celebrating that they are part of something bigger than the individual. Crawford took the idea of totems and religious symbols and related this to sport, the best way to explain it is to relate the findings to an example in this case football. Religions have cathedrals which are used for mass worship where as sports fans and their countries have their international stadiums, for example England has Wembley. Religions also have their local churches and places of worship but in football local teams have their stadiums. In religions Gods are looked up to, but in sports it’s the players that are looked up to. Crawford also explained how religions have symbols of their faith like the cross and St, Christopher. These are all believed to guard and protect the person; it also shows a following of a certain faith. In sport people have their flags, badges and the kits of their sports team. This gives them unity with their team. The final aspect is the use of…
- 1148 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
1. Ninian Smart has established 6 dimensions or structures in a way to find a common ground between all world religions. These are classified into the thought, "mind", dimensions which are the experiential, mythical, and doctrinal dimension, and then the multi-sensory dimensions which are the ritual, ethical and social dimensions.…
- 2484 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays