Preview

Fundamental Contradictions due to Historical Materialism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1348 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fundamental Contradictions due to Historical Materialism
This essay will be firstly looking at what Engels means by exploring historical materialism. I will implement what it is and show how it changed the feudal society. I will show how it connects to alienation, capital, and the individual production and individual appropriation. Second I will be touching on the advancement of technology and private ownership of production in regards to the fundamental contradictions in capitalism and I will explain how the contradictions came about. Third I will be explaining the two contradictions that arise from the fundamental contradiction, some of the things I will consider are the means of production and the mode of production. Lastly, I will show what Engels envisions as the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism.
“The materialist conception of history starts from the principle that production, and with production the exchange of its products, is the basis of every social order; that in every society which has appeared in history the distribution of the products, and with it the division of society into classes or estates is determined by what is produced and how it is produced and how the product is exchanged.” Production is the way to support human life and with production, the way products are exchanged is the key to all social structure. To Engels, historical materialistic approach is tracing feudalism to capitalism. Some of the ideas that characterize this shift from feudalism to capitalism are individual production and social production. Back in the feudal days when individuals produced something they called it “theirs” they owned it. Now in capitalism they cannot call a product “theirs”. There is no such thing as individual appropriation because what we produce or what we make is owned by the owner, either an individual of a large corporation or the corporation itself. After they have made the product it is then given to someone else who sells it. Alienation can play a part in this production

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    sosc1140 essay 2

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capitalism is the most productive economic system that ever exists. Its emergence and development have brought an amazingly rapid increase in productivity. However, the fact that cyclical capitalist economic crisis arises proves that capitalism does not make sense because it has contradictions in it. In this article, I am going to provide explanations about what Engels means by historical materialism, the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and two other contradictions that arise from this contradiction. And I will conclude by explaining Engels’ s anticipation of the eventual outcome of the historical development of capitalism. My main argument is that the fundamental contradiction in capitalism is the contradiction between social production and individual appropriation which leads to the contradiction between the systematic organization of production inside factories and the disorganization of production in society as a whole and the contradiction between the mode of production and the mode of exchange, and the contradiction between market and production (Frederick 295; Frederick 299; Frederick 302).…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the books introduction, Engels, one of the manifesto’s co-authors, defines the bourgeoisie as the class of the capitalist who controls means of production in society. Likewise, he considers the proletariat to be the working majority, which sells its labor to support a system it has no control over (7). Marx, on the other hand, works to apply moral judgments to these two classes, allowing for him to write on more than just a class struggle. His bourgeoisie is exploitative, manipulative, and inherently evil, while he sees the proletariat as the masses destined to rule itself (10, 17) .…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper intends to compare the first industrial revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries and the second industrial revolution of the mid-18th and 19th centuries. It will highlight the transformation from the first revolution to the second revolution, focusing on the presence of giant firms and role of science and technology in economic activities. Additionally, it will introduce the two worldly philosophers Karl Marx and Adam Smith on these issues.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “With the increasing value of the world of things proceeds in direct proportion the devaluation of the world of men. Labour produces not only commodities; it produces itself and the worker as a commodity” (p. 32). He shrinks in comparison to the world of objects that he created but belong to capitalism.…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They thought that as the working classes grew more aware of the exploitation that they suffered from the upper classes they would rise up and as feudalism was replaced by capitalism, that communism would replace capitalism. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels also argued that capitalism is associated with the unfair distribution of wealth and power; a tendency toward market monopoly.…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United State Labor History

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When one considers the effect that the Industrial Revolutions of the 19th and early 20th century, the workers whose backs bore it are seldom reflected upon. It becomes ponderous whether the revolution was a boon or a malediction upon the working class and if they were truly aided by the great rise in standard of living that hallmarked this time. Those who would defend the period would cite pre-Industrialization scenarios, toiling under feudal lords with no future beyond death and an unmarked grave. An opponent of this idea, such as the renowned Karl Marx, would state, 'The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, and new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    10. The materialist theory of history generated by Marx and Engels taught that what mattered was…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the nineteenth century, Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie had definite opinions about the affects of industrialization on society. A greater understanding of their views on history and humanity can be gained by comparing and contrasting two written artifacts: The Communist Manifesto and “Wealth.”…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx's Theory of Alienation

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Alienation, a concept that became widely known during the 19th and 20th century has been looked at extensively by a number of leading theorists. Theorists such as Georg Hegel first used the idea of alienation as a philosophic idea, but his work was later grasped upon by theorists known as Ludwig Feuerbach and more importantly Karl Marx. The world till now has been witness to a change in different social structures and forms in which society operates. We as human beings must ask, what purpose do we serve within society? What means do we have to sustain an effective or prosperous way of living? Marx believed we have been through different economic stages and ownership of the things we need to live, beginning with the times of the ancient to feudalism (land granted from the crown) to now where we have arrived at capitalism (private ownership). He saw this as historical stages of development where each stage has the characteristics of a system of production and division of labour, forms of property ownership and a system of class relations (Morrison,K.1995:40). This brought forward Marx’s idea of historical materialism which centred on how to interpret the history of mankind and the development of one stage of society to the next. In turn it looks for reasons for changes in human society and how humans together produced the necessary requirements to live. In relation to historical materialism there was another idea of dialectal materialism. This was a term used by Marx to study natural phenomena, the evolution of society and human thought itself as a process of development which rests upon motion and contradiction (Clapp,R: Acc 10/11/2012). Marx further explains historical and dialectical materialism which will be looked at further in the essay. By understanding how humans produce the necessities to live (historical materialism) and how a way of reasoning helps us to see the growth…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week’s journal assignment covered the life of Thorstein Veblen. Veblen grew up in Wisconsin on his family owned farm. Being a child of immigrants in the U.S. is never easy; however, the Veblen family could be considered a success story. The family farm provided more than enough which afforded the financial means for the children to continue with higher education. Thorstein Veblen pursued a study in economics along with philosophy. During his studies, Veblen started to form his own view on economics which lead to influence his understanding of socialism. Veblen seem to be very critical when it came to capitalism, but unlike Marx’s view, Veblen believed technology would lead to a intermediate socialistic state and be the shortcoming of capitalism(“Thorstein Veblen”, 2016, para. 1).…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The radicals discuss that the exploitation of one class by another is the major factor that motivates force behind all historical developments. The Manifesto argues that the development of the proletariat appropriating property is inevitable and that capitalism is inherently unstable. Throughout the four sections of the Manifesto, the reader gets to view the relationships between the Proletarians and the Bourgeoisie and the Communists and the proletarians. The reader is informed on the previous socialist literature throughout the third section. The final section discusses the relationship between the Communists and other parties. The source offers evidence by giving direct insight on the unjust actions that were taking place. For example, Friedrick himself observed firsthand the exploitation of blue collar workers under the ruling class in factories, as his father sent him to represent their family in its textile business. The authors, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, assume that the division of labor has exploited proletarians where they have been stripped of their identity due to the advent of 'extensive machinery' and so man 'becomes an appendage of the machine.' Marx and Engels also assumed that once the development of the industry has increased, the proletarians will unite and voice their struggles over reduced wages by forming a trade union. Throughout this source, we see the perspective of the proletarian…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Engels vs. Crystal Palace

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    R&R Instructions: Please describe one example of how Friedrich Engels’s observations about The Condition of the Working Class in England (chaps 1-3 and 6) compare to the vision of the Industrial Revolution that we saw in the Crystal Palace documents. Be sure to focus on a specific comparison—i.e. a single point about or aspect of the Industrial Revolution that they see differently, or similarly—and use quotes wherever possible. Does it seem to you that Engels is looking at this “revolution” from a Painean perspective, or more from a Burkean perspective? Explain.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three main islands which represents global inequality. Each of them is colored differently to impose the idea of inequality as expressed in Fred Engels “the condition of the working class”. “The middle class can never obtain full social and political power over the nation except by the head of the nation”, the main idea behind Engels book is to reveal the effects of the industrial revolution which were not restricted to the business world, but also had massive effects on the living conditions of the population. The islands are painted gold, silver and bronze, which represents how a country is superior than others, and how the working class has most of the advantages around the world. Within those countries there are natural resources like crude oil, gold and crops that can be used for sustainability. Each island dispenses into a river which runs through another island and that represents the distribution of wealth amongst nations “The truth is this: during the period of England’s industrial monopoly the English working class have, to a certain extent, shared in the benefits of the monopoly. These benefits were very unequally parceled out amongst them; the privileged minority pocketed most, but even the great mass had, at least, a temporary share now and then. And that is the reason why, since the dying-out of Owenism, there has been no Socialism in England. With the breakdown of that monopoly, the English working class will lose that privileged position; it will find itself generally – the privileged and leading minority not accepted-on a level with its fellow-workers abroad. And that is the reason why there will be Socialism again in England.” the distribution of wealth in “the conditions of the working class in England” Fred Engels proves to be very unequal amongst nations and workers during the period the book was writing and till…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The next step will be to view some of the key names mentioned in the third part of the text. These writers include the likes of Adam Ferguson and Alexis de Tocqueville. What are easily identifiable are a respect for the historical figures that preceded them and also a respect for the magnitude of their vision. On the other hand, a gradual divergence into the realms of new ideas can be seen, fuelled in turn by the realities of capitalism.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays