As Siegel suggests, there are a number of different motives for youth gang participation which include various anthropological, sociological, psychological factors, in addition to varied reasons of personal choice (2015). The educational component of the gang control model would seek to address these factors so as to change the course of youth involvement in gang related activity by educating local jurisdictions on the various reasons why youth may be motivated to participate in gangs given the unique features of their community. Additionally, social programs focused on youth education might help individuals make more informed decisions regarding gang involvement by focusing their attention on the potential consequences of their …show more content…
While state and local jurisdictions may not be completely able to eradicate gangs, they can take action to reduce their numbers. Consequently, the option of no action at all would not be a viable part of the gang control model. Rather, the gang control model would focus on achieving a balance between suppression, social programs and education in order to address the growing problem of gang activity. Siegel considers “suppression” and “social services” as the two primary methods of controlling gang activity (2015). While suppression tactics may include legal sentences or incarceration, they should also include ways to address the “pushes” and “pulls” of gang participation in the gang control model. These methods of suppression, combined with social services and education, can best mobilize local jurisdictions towards effective gang control. Thus, a balanced model of gang control can most effectively address the issue of gang