Preview

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Analysis
Are you what you say you are: Religious views vs. personal views? “There are around 2.1 billion Christians in the world today and about half of the Christian population are Catholic”(American Catholic 1). Catholicism is the faith, practice, and order of the Roman Catholic Church. However a Catholics religion tends have restrictions on more than the religious views of their congregation but also in their personal and political views. The church has incorporated giving to the poor, protesting euthanasia, and protecting marriage by fighting gay marriage into their teachings. These teachings limit the freedom Catholics and other Christians have in deciding their stance on some political issues as well as personal views. People are faced with …show more content…
Do onto others as you would have them do onto you, the golden rule Christians follow in their day to day lives. In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” Hardin asks us to think of the world as a life boat with limited space. Many feel guilty for their spot on the life boat due to their personal views or society. “The U.S population increases .8 every year while the other countries increase at a rate of 3.3 per year.” Each country is responsible for its own well being, the poorly managed countries will suffer but learn from experience. “The poor population increases 2.5% yearly while the middle class and upper class population increases at only .6% annually.” This being said the poor population will continue to grow at about four times that of the middle and upper class populations. Some believe just giving to the poor will help solve the problem but what happens when the next generation expects a handout? Why do we not help get these …show more content…
Murder is the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. But is it murder if given consent by the victim? Assisted suicide is becoming a common practice in many countries this is being supported by the people’s “right-to-die”, However, it is believed that God is the giver and taker of life and his will take precedence over man’s will….Today Americans seem to greedy for the joys and want to leave out the sorrows of life” (Beckman 1), however; just as we would not know cold if there was no warm or dark if there was no light we cannot have joys without sorrow. God has a reason for everything under heaven, yes, even suffering. The supporters and Christians seem to be in constant battle about the controversial topic of euthanasia. The supporters have argued “everyone has a right to do with their own body as they see fit” to this Christians say is a weak argument. Prostitution is illegal they cannot sell their bodies even if that is what they see fit. While each person has a right to life protected by the Declaration of Independence the quality of life is what the supporters argue. When a person begins to feel they are a burden is it fair to keep them alive against their will and have their last memories be memories of feeling useless. Asking to end the suffering isn’t saying they don’t want suffering in life it just means they have suffered enough and they are ready to move on. A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In college it is a common sight to see students crowding a room on the first day to try to get a spot in a class that is a requirement to graduate, but most of them already know they might not be able to get a spot in the class. This phenomenon is an example of the idea of “lifeboat” ethics. Garrett Hardin, the writer of Lifeboat Ethics, said in his writings “So we sit here, say fifty people in our life boat... let us assume that it has room for ten more… [we] see one hundred others swimming in the water outside, begging for admission in to our boat...” (Hardin 415). Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics is about the concept that we’re on a boat and we’re trying to decide who will get on the lifeboat and survive. Though we are not in the open sea, our…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is an issue that goes against my own personal religious morals. God has given us life and we do not have the right to end our own lives. I personally feel it is a sin against God. The bible supports my belief with the Ten Commandments, Though shall not kill. This bible verse doesn't specify who you cannot kill. It says do not. Killing oneself goes against the ten commandments. Suffering is a horrible thing but I believe many times suffering occurs for a reason. Perhaps, something someone else can learn from it. The bible also can be quoted as saying, Above all things, God wishes that we be in good health and be prosperous even as our souls prosper. God, indeed, doesn't want us to suffer but I still feel it is wrong to take the life that God has given…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Boat Ethical Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle, a famous Greek philosopher, had a theory of trying to simplify the task of arguing by dividing and classifying arguments into three types. The three types are called Logos or logic-base, Pathos or emotion based, and Ethos or credibility based. The two classic essays, “Life Boat Ethics” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Johnathan Swift, the writers make good suggestions with these types of arguments over world population and world famine.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I chose Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor, by Garret Hardin, to analyze because, out of all the readings I have ever done for English, this particular one is by far the most memorable. It is also perfectly suited for my argument, because it is appropriately as offensive as it is logical. The essay, in short, is a rhetorical argument that claims that helping the poor or unfortunate people of the world-though it is considered the “right” thing to do- is, in actuality, harmful to the very future of our species. The actual message of the essay, however, is not what I want to endorse. When this essay was assigned to my class junior year,…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States and in many other countries when women get pregnant, they often talk about the immediate bond between mother and her unborn child. However, in other countries and cultures, women don't feel a bond with their unborn children until the child is born healthy, happy and grows to a certain age. There are people who think the issue of bonding with your child is culturally based and others argue that this bonding takes place naturally. While Nancy Scheper-Hughs argues that mother-infant bonding is culturally based and occurs over a period of time, Lucinda J. Peach refutes this argument by saying that there is an immediate and natural bond between a mother and unborn child. I will compare and contrast these two articles and their…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person knows what the circle of life consists of- to be born, to grow and to die. The lines between the right and wrongs of each are fuzzy and unclear. Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates and there are so many questions with no clear answers: who should and shouldn’t be allowed to assist in suicides? Should assisted suicide be just for the terminally ill, or for all? What protection will there be for the people? and the biggest question of all- is it right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is their own right. That there is a significant “difference between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die” (Breslow). Others however, believe The Suicide…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue concerning assisted suicide is an extensively debated ethical affair. The debate stems from different viewpoints first concerning when the act is considered appropriate and then what the resulting consequences would look like if the act were permissible (Lo, 2005). Ethical decisions in assisted suicide are debated along the lines concerned with the worthy nature of life and on what is entailed in a life that is worth living and consequently, who ultimately decides this. Many religions, however, hold that life is Gods’ gift, which should not be interfered with let alone be destroyed (Lo, 2005).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different people, operating under different viewpoints, maintain diverse beliefs regarding the issue of euthanasia. While some, such as the Buddhists, have more fluid beliefs toward medically-assisted death, others, such as the Catholics, remain firmly opposed. Personally, I agree with the Catholic Church’s perspective on euthanasia. While I know I am not in the position to preach understanding of the pains associated with certain terminal illnesses, I firmly believe that all life, even a life of suffering, is precious and purposeful. As humans are not the true origin of life, neither should we choose when to end our lives. Buddhism suggests that one can become enlightened enough to choose to end their life, but as we were never involved in our initial creation, such enlightenment would be impossible. Patients such as Brittany Maynard seek to end their lives with dignity, as opposed to dying in pain and agony, but death is not meant to be dignified. As our life on earth ends, we should be humbled and fully realize our dependence on God. While I remain open-minded to the reasoning behind euthanasia, my current perspective does not morally support…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People that are against, say that it is God’s decision when a person dies and no one should hamper with that. Others say it is a humane and compassionate thing to allow people who are close to death and in pain decide to do. The conversely over the Death with Dignity Act as has inspired many pros and cons, for example, legalizing Death with Dignity will help in alleviating the patient’s suffering of terminal ill. It will be unfair and inhuman to allow them stand the intolerable pain vs. Death with Dignity or mercy killing is ethically incorrect and must be prohibited by law, and that is to be considered as homicide and killing or murdering another individual may not be rationalized on any circumstances. Given that Death with dignity must be a normal extension of the rights of the patient enabling him to make a decision about the value of death and life.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For decades, the public, government, and physicians have been debating over the “Death with Dignity Act” or “Physician-Assisted Suicide.” It started back in the Ancient Greek and Rome time. The debate originated around the Hippocratic Oath and the condemnation of the practice. With the upsurge of Christianity, many physicians continued to condemn the practice. Within the last two centuries the public has spurned many discussions about Physician-assisted suicide and Euthanasia from many different historic perspectives (Procon.org, 2012). Although this debate has been lengthy and many of the issues discussed over the centuries are repetitive, new ideas and concerns do emerge with the current debate. What do you think when you here assisted suicide? Would you want your family member to suffer with an illness that has put them in so much pain that they cannot function? Personally, I would not want to see my family member suffer in pain while they are dying with no cure.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For an unaffected, healthy individual, with death painted as a villain by his subconscious, it is easy to raise a gavel against the legalization of assisted suicide. It is easy for this individual to deny the right to end one’s suffering by citing a variety of aged, insignificant arguments like ancient oaths and biased religious teachings, all in defense of the instinct of his subconscious. However, the debate over assisted suicide is greater than this, and must be considered much more deliberately and meticulously. When one considers justice, autonomy, compassion, and all other necessary factors in the modern assisted suicide debate, it is clear that the practice of physician-assisted suicide is merciful and necessary, and must be a provided right to suffering individuals near the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life in order to release an individual from unbearable suffering or an incurable disease. Euthanasia the word is derived from Ancient Greek, Eu meaning “good” and Thantos meaning “Death” and when combined the term means “Good Death”. Mercy Death by definition is taking a direct action to terminate a person’s life because the person has requested to do so. This also includes physician assisted suicide, not to be confused with suicide which is the taking of one’s life by one’s own hand without assistance. Mercy Killing is also a term used and it refers to someone taking a direct action to terminate a person’s life without the person’s permission. Within this paper I will discuss Immanuel Kant and the utilitarianism ethical theories revolving around the issues of euthanasia.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays