Preview

Gasland Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gasland Film Analysis
In the documentary Gasland Josh Fox talked about how people's properties were being invaded by fracking industries which is "hydraulic fracturing" which is drilling into the ground for natural gas as Josh Fox explained in this documentary. All of these people had been suffering with the water portion of it because with the oil drilling there water pipes were mixed in with the oil which there water faucets water came mixed with oil which meant that the water is not drinkable that’s why Fox went into a little adventure so he can personally see this and get evidence from all of these people with high oil underground. By visiting all of these people that were high in oil which most of the industries offered money for their land which was not enough …show more content…
In this documentary really surprised was that there is a lot of land here in the united states that is rich in natural gas which the government says it's okay if they just frack a land which is not right for them just to come to our land which what they don’t see that they have ruined …show more content…
Many people couldn’t wash their clothes or even drink water I felt really sad people be living in these poor conditions people should get together to stop this because all this can ruin the environment. As they were showing in the documentary people had drank the water and gotten sick which they had gone to the hospital because there are some serious sickness.
Gasland did a great job of convincing us as audience by teaching us about natural gas which all of the natural gas is found underground according to google.com "Flammable gas, consisting largely of methane and other hydrocarbons, occurring naturally underground (often in association with petroleum) and used as fuel." People should watch gasland documentary because people don’t have the knowledge about what fracking

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    "Gasland" and "Fracknation" are two documentary films based off hydraulic fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing as indicated by dictionary.com is the forcing open of fissures in subterranean rocks by introducing liquid at high pressure, especially to extract oil or gas. Hydraulic fracturing started as a trial in 1947. It is a technique where a high weight of liquid (more often than not chemicals suspended in water) is infused into a wellbore to make splits in the profound rock arrangements through which regular gas, petroleum, and salt water will flow all more freely. Other than the United States, hydraulic fracking happens in New Zealand, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Fracking has been proven gainful and additionally unbeneficial to numerous…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When watching the documentary "Gasland" by Josh Fox , I have had no prior knowledge of what Fracking truly was. I have to say though as this documentary was in full swing I couldn't keep my eyes off the screen. As I couldn’t believe after watching this film what fracking was. I thought fracking was insanely harmful to not only animals , humans and the property they both live on as well. It did two very different things when it came to animals and humans. When it comes to the animals they were the ones that had no choose but to drink it so they were not only dying because of it but they also had hair lose, and are unable to eat be as well. This is terrible for the farmers cause they now cannot breed this cow or this pig , they now cannot…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    gasland analysis

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This film was very interesting and helpful because in my earth science class I am giving a group presentation of Hydro-fracking, and although I discovered in my research how harmful it can be, seeing personal accounts of it gave me a better feel on the subject. I think we need to come up with a better way to get natural gas out rock because injecting chemical fluid into the ground is too risky pertaining to our water supply. After all, we need water to survive. I agree that it is a problem that we are depending on what one legislature calls "foreign oil and terrorism," but I would rather keep depending on these resources then polluting our water supply and turning American land into nasty dumps. From this film and the group project I participated in for class, I have learned that our water can be easily contaminated. Fracking needs to be a careful process that should be done nowhere near major water sources are located.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is nothing fictitious about the arguments in fracking. Hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, is a way of obtaining oil and gas through the practice of cracking open rocks at high pressures using water, sand, and various chemicals (Jackson, 2016, para. 1). All over America, numerous interest groups participate in a continuous debate on the ethics of this procedure. Two prominent documentaries that circulate the media are FrackNation by Phelim McAleer and Gasland by Josh Fox. Each documentary presents its view of pro-fracking and anti-fracking, respectively through a series of various logical fallacies. FrackNation efficiently refutes the claims of Gasland through the effective use of logical fallacies.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gasland Josh Fox Analysis

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gasland is a documentary written, produced and directed by founder and artistic director of international WOW Company, Josh Fox. The film won six awards including Special Jury Prize in 2010 Sundace Film Festival and was also nominated for an Academy Awards for best documentary in 2011. The film shows effects of natural gas drilling on water sources and the environment. It also shows the influence of big businesses on legislatures that leaves the very own people who elected them to represent, unheard, ignored, misrepresented and hopeless. It is the best work of Josh Fox so far. The film makes good effort to convince us that fracking is contaminating drinking water sources…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gasland the Documentary

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gasland, a documentary produced and directed by Josh Fox, focuses on communities in the United States that have been impacted by natural gas drilling. It shows an in-depth look at a method known as fracking which horizontally drills into deep rock in search of the black gold. Josh Fox lives in Pennsylvania and when he was asked to lease his families land out to an oil company so they could drill on his property, he refused and decided to take action. Fox traveled all around the country and visited residencies in communities that were badly hit by this sudden rush for the natural gas. There are many scenes in the documentary which illustrate three key aspects to a film, subject, credibility, and impact.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘ Spills, accidents, improper disposal and poor well construction can lead the toxic chemicals in fracking fluid entering drinking water; more than 1,000 cases of water contamination near drilling sites were documented nationally’ according to the Food and Water Watch group. This adverse pollution of groundwater cannot be reversed and it may be difficult to detect and address all the problem sources because Fracking Companies do not need to disclose what is used in the process. Fracking can also lead to droughts as water is sometimes extracted from already water-deprived communities. Only a tiny percent of water is regained and stored in pits, and still ends up being hazardous to living things around them. There were many reports of illnesses in livestock that were exposed to these waste water pits, and according to the results of an experimental study every tree exposed to fracking…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaslands Part II

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie Gaslands: Part II highlights the many problems with fracking for natural gas in the United States. It starts by showing the support of politicians and President Barack Obama himself. Gradually, the movie starts to show the wrongs that the oil companies are committing while fracking. The natural gas is so profitable that the injustice seems like a minor setback in the quest for the end results. Throughout the movie, it shows how families are affected, and just how spread out these families are throughout the country, which goes to show the extent to which the country is affected.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I knew that fracking was a contentious issue to say the least, and I have always held some degree of disdain towards big oil companies so I cannot say I was unbiased at the outset. My initial perception while watching Gasland was that this industry might actually help the communities mentioned in the film, however, I changed my tack very quickly when I began to think about how fracking makes inequality even worse, a sad truth, but an evident one. In that way, my perception of communities affected by fracking was unjustified and wrong. Though my perception of fracking communities was wrong, my perception of oil companies was galvanized further. It is obvious that these massive corporations are only out for profit, which is an obvious truth, but one that is hugely important. They do not care about who they are driving out of their homes, what they are doing to vulnerable communities or what happens when they leave. The bottom line is the only thing that matters and if worsening inequality is the price, then they have no problem paying it. My perception of people paid off by these companies is harmful because my initial thought was that this was a good thing for less fortunate people, when it clearly is not. The mistake in my perception of big oil companies is that the damage caused cannot be reversed, and that they are unstoppable, when the power to stop them is very much in the hands of the average person. The environmental effects are no doubt horrible, but I feel as though the social effects must be discussed more in order to make the changes necessary to put an end to…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial new method of extracting natural gas from the earth has become a danger for Americans. This method is called Hydraulic Fracturing, or Fracking. This drilling has made it possible to retrieve methane gas trapped in the shale rock that lays thousands of feet below the ground. For some, fracking can be seen as a good thing for our country. Fracking is boosting the nation’s economy, creating jobs and energy export opportunities, and strengthening the energy independence of the United States. Although it may help in some aspects, it comes at a very high cost to the American people. Fracking is extremely harmful to the water supply, the environment, and the population.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    W hy does everyone care so much about natural gas? Why is it such an essential part of modern culture? Sure, it's an exciting and up and coming technology, which is fuel for the technological generation that we've grown up in, but we need to take a closer look to see the methods and impacts that could affect generations after us.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros Of Fracking

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another problem is that fracking can get into water. A family,called the Headly’s, had bought a house but what they didn’t know was that the owner before them had sold oil and gas rights. So fracking started on their property and after that start the headleys got rashes, nosebleeds and something have trouble breathing.this was all because gas and oil had gotten into their well which they were reliant on for water.In some places water is so rich with gas from fracking that it can be set on fire. This can relate to me since I have a well to get water from and i wouldn’t want my water to be polluted from fracking.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Effects

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The debate and issues circling fracking is the use and management of toxic waste water. Accumulating to nearly 4 million gallons per drilling well, and what is left when they are finished? A toxic waste harmful to animals, humans, and the environment. Steps are currently being taken to reduce the waste effect such as; reusing it, leaving it in open air pits, or by drilling and storing it deep into the ground. While fracking companies say it is safe, most anti-fracking corporations see it is putting the waste back into the environment, as well as wasting water in an already severe drought. Due to fracking’s unsafe and wasteful water methods, it should not be allowed in community areas or in areas of vast wildlife and environment ("What is Fracking,…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays