Bruker AXS D8 model (Cu Kα radiation) …show more content…
One can see from Figure 2 and Table 2 that the FWHM of the size distributions decreases with increasing amount of the dopant ions. This observation shows that the presence of dopant ions makes the size distribution more uniform while decreases the sizes of the nano-powders. It is also seen that the change of the FWHM of the distribution is more prominent in non-annealed samples. It is also evident that the size distributions for non-annealed samples (small grains) have an asymmetrical shape with small FWHMs while the distributions of annealed samples (larger grains) become more symmetrical and their FWHMs are larger.
The representative SEM image of the G100-1000 nanopowders is given in Figure 3. The micrograph of the sample shows the agglomerated nanopowders with spherical morphology are relatively uniform and have average diameters of ~100 nm. The deviation in estimated sizes by SEM and XRD is due to the fact that XRD refers to single crystalline size while SEM refers to polycrystals. Spectroscopic