If I was a juror in this case, I would find that Clarence was a supervisor and found him guilty of sexual harassment. He guided the team’s members on his line, he…
Considering the sensitivity of the case, candidates were warned that they would hear narrations about profane and vulgar sexual acts. District Court Judge Michael Fitzgerald said that the core of Derrick Rose rape case is sexual act so the jury need to prepare hearing sensitive details. The plaintiff already appeared before the jury and was…
In 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Columbia Law School, Cornell University, and Harvard Law School graduate, became the second woman to ever be given a position in the Supreme Court. Born into a low income family in Brooklyn, New York on March 15, 1933, Ginsburg was frequently exposed to gender discrimination throughout her college years—as there were “only 8 other females in a class of 500 students” at Harvard Law—as well as in the work force. This ultimately pushed her to fight for gender equality. She began her career as a clerk and then teacher, becoming Columbia University’s first tenured teacher who was a woman. Following this, she took on several projects in which she fought for the rights of woman in front of the Supreme Court of the United…
A male defendant case mentioned by Phillips (2003:510) is that Dong-lu Chen, who was a Chinese immigrant to New York, battered his wife to death some weeks after discovering she was having an affair. At his trial in 1988, an expert claimed that violence against women for adultery was commonplace in the traditional Chinese culture due to the fact that the adulterous act of a woman would be seen as an enormous statin on her husband and even affect his remarriage. Therefore, the judge made their judgments that Chen was ‘driven to violence by traditional Chinese values about adultery and loss of manhood’, and convicted him of second-degree manslaughter. Issues related to the culture backgrounds of the defendants may affect the level of punishment…
Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…
During Casey's trial she sat there emotionless. The only time that she had appeared to be upset was when the jury had criticized her as a person, but not as a parent. Casey used the defense that she was allegedly sexually abused as a child as a reason to be unfit for trial, even though she had already proclaimed her innocence. When Casey had been told that her daughter's body had been found she acted like it was not a surprise to her. Nothing about her daughter being dead seemed to phase her.…
Later in the movie, the case is in a district court. This had a lot of components of what we learned in class including, judges, bailiffs, the court reporter, and witnesses. As we learned in class, the judge is given the highest honor in the room. In the movie he was given the hammer, placed in the highest point of the room, and even said he should be addressed as “judge” or “your honor”. The bailiff on many occasions addresses the courtroom and says, “All rise” just as we learned as well. On another occasion, Kaffee asks the courtroom reporter to read back Colonel Jessup’s statement, because they must write down everything said at trial. This was all taught when we learned about the courtroom workers.…
If I was the judge presiding over Gampero's case I would have acted professional, and honorable. Judge force Charles Gampero J.R into accepting a plea bargain by using his position over the courtroom to influence his choice. I would have not told a man if he was found guilty, I would give him the maximum sentenced of 25 years. United States of America is innocent before guilty, and judge Francis Egitto demonstrate behavior that was unconstitutional. In my opinion, I would have not assume the man was guilty, but innocence because as a judge I took a oath to be a servant of the courtroom. Additionally, individuals such as judges must take a neutral stand against information, until it has been proven in court. This to me is truly a professional,…
Goldman, Tom. "40 Years On, Title IX Still Shapes Female Athletes." NPR. NPR, 22 June 2012. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. .…
I agree with Judge Lamberth on most of this case. He did rule for the plaintiff on emotional distress and this outrageous conduct of Ms. Bakilana. He granted her restitution of her wages. If I were the judge I would have awarded her more money and given Bakilana more than 2 years’ probation.…
The Duke Lacrosse case was a rape case that involved false rape charges against three Duke University lacrosse players, began with gang rape allegations by an exotic dancer at a team party in March 2006. Crystal an African American student at North Carolina Central University who worked as a stripper dancer and escort,accused three white Duke University students, members of the Duke Blue Devils men's lacrosse team, of raping her at a party held at the house of two of the team's captains in durham, north carolina . But her conflicting stories shattered her credibility. The case of the Duke lacrosse team was spread out over several months and included the lacrosse season being cancelled, three players indicted on rape charges, a crooked prosecutor, turncoat faculty members and administrators, irate neighbors and even dirty cops, all of whom had their own personal agendas. Ms Magnum tells Durham police that three members of the lacrosse team forced her into a bathroom, where they beat her, raped her . The Judge orders the team members to provide DNA samples and be photographed .Forty-six of the team's 47 members comply with a judge's orders. The team's sole black member is not tested because the victim said her alleged attackers were white. The players provided cheek swabs as a form of DNA and statements to the police . They also offered to take polygraph tests. When the results came back it showed up negative . Additional test were taken from the duke lacrosse players including fingernails , underwear and the results from that also didn’t match any of the players tested . After further review the DNA samples were from Ms Magnums boyfriend , Falsely accusing her alleged attackers of rape .Defense attorneys statned that time-stamped photographs exist that show the dancer was injured upon arrival and very impaired. The Duke defense lawyers or media reports have said that:…
Trial Judges are appointed to ensure justice in courtroom proceedings. Judges are also responsible with safeguarding both rights of the accused, and interests of the public. By doing so, this keeps the prosecutor grounded by making sure guilt is established of the accused as required by criminal law. The workgroup interact with each other daily. While the judge oversees the procedure, the prosecutor, defense attorney, and public defenders help to create a visual that is easy for the judge to see what happened. Prosecuting attorneys are the primary representatives of the people, by virtue of belief that the accused violated a criminal law and that the public knows about it. The defense attorney represents the accused by making sure that the defendant’s civil…
Dating back to the 1970s many people, not just women, were on the rise to seek equality among the sexes. Title IX, passed in 1972 by congress during the Nixon administration, was a direct result of the developing social changes and the growing importance of athletics and education in American culture. Before the amendment was passed, schools had the ability to indirectly restrict women from receiving a higher education and participating in collegiate sports by raising the average grade standard to be admitted and only giving out two percent of their scholarship money on average to female athletes. Title IX, or known as the Equal Rights Amendment, would help to transition and change the roles of women in society. Shirley Chisholm spoke on behalf of the Equal Rights Amendment, “The Equal Rights Amendment would govern only the relationship between the State and its citizens – not relationships between private citizens”.…
Often in literature as in life, characters and people experience discrimination, racial injustice, educational inequalities, poverty, and pollution. Among these characters and people, some can become negativly affected. Among those who are negatively affected, there are always those who fearlessly stand up for their beliefs. Standing up for what someone believes requires extreme bravery. Throughout history many people worked to have their voices heard. Sojourner Truth, President Lyndon B. Johnson, and Shirley Chisholm used their voices to create change. Authors also used literature as a vehicle to create change through fictional characters’ voices and actions. - The level of bravery illustrated paved the way for change.…
“Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices. Title IX applies, with a few specific exceptions, to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities” [1]. The creation and enforcement would change the opportunities and chance given to women in both education and sports for all of time. It helped to give way to some of the most iconic female athletes and coaches at both the amateur and professional level. It helped to give the…