Preview

General Principles of European Union Law

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Principles of European Union Law
Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..1
Concept of new legal order and its effect on sovereignty of Member States……………….1
The role of ECJ in developing principles and whether Treaties expressly provided basis for those principles…………………………………………………………………………………2
Supremacy of Community law………………………………………………………………...3
Interpretation of Community law…………………………………………………………….3
Non-discrimination on the basis of nationality/gender as fundamental principle………...4
Principle of proportionality…………………………………………………………………...5
Human rights in the European Union………………………………………………………..6
The direct effect of European law…………………………………………………………….7
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...8
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...9

General Principles of European Union Law
Introduction
Today’s well-known Union of 27 member states of Europe was created in early 1950s by the chain of events. Early unions such as European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), European Economic Community (EEC) and the Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) have made the foundation of the developed European Union. European Union is an economic and political entity located in Europe, it is also fact that EU is a huge market. EU was created by the treaty of European Union in 1993. The EU law is supranational law, it is supreme to the national laws of the member states and not limited by any national laws.

Concept of new legal order and its effect on sovereignty of Member States
The supremacy of EU law over the national laws of the EU member states means that the law created by EU has a direct effect on the EU countries and must be applied. Case “Van Gend en Loos vs. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen” of 1963 has raised a question whether Community law is applicable to individuals as well as to the member states. It has been decided by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that the national courts must protect individual rights, thus it lead to the creation of “direct



Bibliography: 2. Albi, A., (2007). Supremacy of EC Law in the New Member States. European Constitutional Law Review. 3. 25-67. [online] Available from: KAR [Accessed 23 January 2011] 3 4. Europa, (2010). The direct effect of European law. [online] Available from: Europa. [Accessed 20 January 2011] 5 6. Europa, (2010). The position of Union law in relation to the legal order as a whole. [online] Available from: Europa. [Accessed 20 January 2011] 7 8. Europa, (2010). Non-discrimination principle. [online] Available from: Europa. [Accessed 20 January 2011] 9 10. Europa, (2010). Discrimination. [online] Available from: Europa. [Accessed 20 January 2011] 11 12. European commission, (2010). Common principles and pathways. [online] Available from: European commission. [Accessed 21 January 2011] 13 14. European Law Monitor, (2008). What is the Principle of Proportionality & Subsidiarity? [online] Available from: Dvisions. [Accessed 20 January 2011] 15 16. Iliopoulos, C., (2008). The principle of non-discrimination in Europe - 17 18. Mifsud-Bonnici, A., (1996). The role of the Court of Justice in the development of the General Principles of Community Law. [online] Available from: Aron Mifsud-Bonnici LL.D. [Accessed 21 January 2011] 19 20. Oxford University Press, (2010). EU Law Concentrate 2e. [online] Available from: Oxford University Press [Accessed 24 January 2011] Book sources: 1. Hartley, T. (2008). The Foundations of European Community Law, 4th ed. pp. 37-44 Oxford: OUP. 2. Fairhurst, J and Vincenzi, C. (2003). Law of the European Community, 4th ed.. Ch.4. Harlow: Pearson. 3. Shaw, J. (2000). Law of the European Union, 3d ed. Ch.6 Basingstoke: Palgrave.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Archick, K 2015, ‘The European Union: questions and answers’, Congressional Research Service, p. 4.…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    European Law is very complex law , within EU law there is various different treaties which are in place. Two most significant treaties which have importance to the legislative process are The Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union.…

    • 2450 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “…judicial and legislative developments *have+ made the *infringement+ procedure [come] of age- from a rarely used, opaque and policy-driven procedure, it has now become a common, fairly transparent and highly technical procedure.” Prete & Smuldres “The coming of age of infringement proceedings” (2010) 47 CMLR 9 Has the infringement procedure finally “come of age”? Critically outline the key features of the Article 258 TFEU procedure and relevant caselaw. Article 258 TFEU (Formerly Art 226 EC) empowers the European Commission to deliver a reasoned opinion to a member state when it considers that the state has failed to fulfil an obligation under the treaties. The action seeks to “fulfil an obligation under the EC Treaty” and to “obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State infringes Community Law and of terminating that conduct”. If the Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the member state has failed to fulfil the obligation the member state shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment. Other mechanisms exist to secure the correct application of EU Law, including the principle of direct effect and primacy of EU Law. These measures permits an individual or a company to have their rights enforced before a national court on the basis of EU Law provisions, even if such provisions are not specified within the national legal system where the application is made. Article 258 TFEU can be described as a law enforcement tool against Member States. Each Member State is responsible for the applying EU Law in a manner that is full and correct. The Court has the power to decide if a Member State is meeting its obligations that is has under the Treaties. According to statistics from the Court, approximately 200 cases are lodged before it each year. This accounts for a fraction of the suspected infringements that are investigated. The vast majority of cases are resolved through dialogue and negotiation. As such, court…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 2 ]. Shapiro, M., & Stone, A. (1994). The new constitutional politics of Europe.Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 397-420.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    “European law is based on two fundamental legal doctrines, direct effect and supremacy.”1 The doctrine of supremacy, which has no formal basis in the original Treaty of European Community,2 was first established by the European Court of Justice in the case of Flaminio Costa v ENEL3. The ECJ concluded in Costa that when conflicts arise, EU law always prevails over national law. Moreover, the ECJ argued that “the precedence of Community law is confirmed by Article 189, whereby a regulation ‘shall be binding’ and ‘directly applicable in all Member States’.”4 In other words, this doctrine of supremacy states that “in case, and to the extent, of irreconcilable results in the application of both legal systems to the same situation, the conflicting national law of member states becomes inapplicable.”5 Therefore, throughout this essay, I shall go on to examine the supremacy of EU Law over national law where this dialogue will be observed from the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) perspective and from the national perspective of some of the Member States of the EU, taking into account the tension present between the two perspectives.…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enforcing the European Union legal system is diverse and done on multiple platforms; through not only actions taken against member states for breach of their obligations, but also, for example, through the use of direct effect1. Article 267 TFEU; an organism devised to practice private enforcement of EU law before national courts, has been critical to ensure uniform interpretation and application of EU law in member states. References for preliminary rulings occur when the national courts are presented with a question of EU law due to uncertainty of the provision. The national court will therefore ‘make a reference to the Court of Justice (COJ) to obtain a preliminary ruling on any point of EU law relevant to the proceedings’2. In practice, the introduction of private enforcement of EU law before national courts had been significant to the success of legal order. However over recent years there has been an increase in advocating limiting the lower court’s power to send preliminary references, seeing the desire for a ‘national judicial hierarchy as an important element of the union judicial process’3. It has been proposed that preliminary references are ‘another infant disease’ of the community legal order4, highly unsatisfactory due to the heavy caseload.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ECHR, although not signed by the EU as one body, is signed by all 25 members of EU and has a great deal of standing in each signatory state. The ECJ, when making its decisions has demonstrated that the ECHR is a valuable source. For example in the early case of Nold the ECJ examines the status of fundamental rights considering “in particular the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights…”. However, the situation has not changed much, as is demonstrated in a recent case where the ECJ states:…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Time 10:00‐12:00 Description Lecture 5: Legal Integration in Europe Lecturer: TBA Reading: TBA Seminar 3 Lecturers: Maurits Rost, Pepijn van Haren,…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Parliament must now legislate consistently with European Community Law. The terms of the European treaties as interpreted by the European Court of Justice require member states to limit their sovereignty, by Parliament giving direct effect and primacy to EU Law. The European Court of Justice states that European Community Law should be enforceable in the courts of member states and that EU law prevails domestic law of member state, which includes the United Kingdom. The ECJ, as the judicial institution of the Community, is the backbone of that system of safeguards. It is responsible for interpreting questions of EC law and provision is made in the Treaty for references to the ECJ by national courts. Decisions of the ECJ, upon a reference, are reached by majority vote and are binding on all domestic courts of all Member States. Under Article 234 the ECJ has achieved the principle of supremacy and its uniform application in all Member States when Community law may be in conflict with domestic…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Guantanamo Bay is a detention camp in Cuba that holds back and interrogates people who are thought to be terrorists.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay briefly traces the history of the constitutional mandate or prerogative powers, discusses the hierarchy of the English legal system and the sovereignty of Parliament. It then examines the contention vis-à-vis the right to a fair trial in relation to EU…

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though it has been argued that the supposed supremacy of parliament is eroding due to the development of law such as entering the European Union in 1972 which now oversee and have the ability to override domestic law . The apparent problem with this is that UK legislatures no longer have power to enact legislation without abiding to EU law requirements . According to Sir William Wade, this resulted in what was said to be “constitutionally impossible” to do as the parliament of 1972 were now bounded by future parliaments which ultimately undermines the legal doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. A clear example is in the case of Factortame when it went against the UK’s constitutional practice that the most recent legislation was to prevail as priority, but instead invoked the European Communities Act 1972 over the Merchant Shipping Act which was passed in 1988 on the basis that when entering the European Communities (now known as European Union) the parliament made the agreement of “permanent limitation of their sovereign rights” and that should domestic…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    European Law Making System

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The primary law of European Union comes from founding treaties and subsequent amendments. This is the very basis of EU law and has direct impact on the lives of EU citizens. Primary laws are created by direct negotiations between governments of member states.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Azerbaijan

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Competence of the EU. Harmonization of national law on the base of Art 115 [94] TFEU (Principe of unanimity): (1) Directives for mass dismissals (Dir. 75/129/EEC, now 98/59/EC), (2) Directives for protection in the event of transfers of undertakings and businesses (Dir.77/187/EEC, now Dir. 2001/23/EC) (3) Directives for protection in the event of the insolvency (Dir. 80/987/EEC). SingleEuropean Act 1.7.1987: qualified majority consent primarily in the field of employment safety regulations:(1) Art 114 [95] TFEU: Approximation of laws. (2) Art 153 [137] TFEU: Minimum requirements for directives for advancement, particularly in the working environment, for workers protection:Directives for working time (Dir. 93/104/EC, now 2003/88 EC). Protocol about social policy to the Treaty of Maastricht now in Art 154 TFEU. Agreement between the Member States in social policy…

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays