Preview

General Sherman's role in the Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
General Sherman's role in the Civil War
Evaluate the role of General Sherman in the defeat of the Confederacy.

William Tecumseh Sherman was an American soldier, businessman, educator and author. He served as a General in the Union Army during the American Civil War. He was a renowned general and received commendation for his outstanding command of military strategy, as well as being criticised for his harshness of the “scorched earth” policies that he implemented in conducting total war against the South. Sherman’s attitude to war and his implementation of the strategy of total war were vital in the defeat of the Confederacy.

Sherman’s attitude to the Confederate forces was a key aspect in the result of a Union Victory. Sherman admired the Southern forces and wrote in a letter to his wife in 1864, describing the Confederate forces. “The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired. No amount of poverty or adversity seems to shake their faith.” Sherman’s view on the Southern spirit would play a significant role in the way Sherman attempted to overcome these forces. Sherman’s subsequent actions after his letter to his wife accentuated his belief that severe measures were necessary to break the dogged Confederate resistance.

The March to the Sea was the most destructive campaign against a civilian population during the Civil War and began in Atlanta on November 15, 1864. The movement was conducted by General Sherman and began the process of waging total annihilation on the South, which Sherman defined as “hard war”. The campaign began at the captured city of Atlanta on November 15 and ended with the capture of Port Savannah on December 21. Sherman’s forces destroyed infrastructure, industry and civilian property and disrupted the South’s economy. This disparaging nature of warfare was not unknown to Sherman as he viewed war as being cruel. In his comments at the Louisiana State Seminary on 24 December 1860 he stated, “War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1861-1864 georgia studies

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sherman’s army moved quickly through the state heading from Atlanta to Savannah, burning everything in the path sixty miles wide on the three hundred miles trek to the coast. On his way to Atlanta to Savannah, Sherman destroys all military targets and the civilian economic system…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman’s March was a march lead by General William T. Sherman. During this march he lead 100,000 soldiers from Tennessee to Atlanta , Georgia. The purpose of Sherman’s March was to destroy Confederate industries and railroads. This march affected the Civil War because Confederate troops now had no railroads for fast transport of troops. Also, the Confederates now had no way to make goods because the Union had destroyed their industries and factories. If this didn’t happen, the Confederates could have sent their troops through their railroads to attack the Union. This could have majorly changed the outcome of the war. The Union could have been attacked and the Confederates could have gained more land. Lincoln needed a victory from the union…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethnics of Sherman's March

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    General Sherman had several objectives in mind when setting out from Atlanta aside from reaching and taking Savannah. Important objectives included destroying any buildings that could assist the Confederacy. Other valuable…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Civil War, there were many great commanders that helped make the war successful. Winfield Scott Hancock is not only known for the Civil War, but in the many other wars that he fought bravely in. Hancock is known for when he commanded the Union center, and defeated Confederate troops, which was known as Pickett's Charge.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman's March to the Sea is the name commonly given to the military Savannah Campaign in the American Civil War, conducted through Georgia from November 15 to December 21, 1864 by Major General William Tecumseh Sherman of the Union Army. After leaving the city of Atlanta on November 16, Sherman led his troops on on a campaign which concluded the capture of of Savannah on December 21. His forces destroyed military targets as well as industry, infrastructure, and civilian property and disrupted the Confederacy's economy and its transportation networks. Sherman's bold move of operating deep within enemy territory and without supply lines is considered to be revolutionary in the annals of war. The campaign was designed by Grant and Sherman…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reviewing the photographs of the tactics use by General Sherman throughout the Civil War, I have come to the conclusion that nowadays his approach can be seen as excessive and immoral; however, during a time of war, such tactics might have been necessary to culminate the conflict. Moreover, in my opinion, General Sherman conviction to end the war led him to employ a technique known as the “scorched earth tactics;” such strategy can be utilized to break the enemy’s economy and wage psychological warfare on the enemy’s population. By widespread of destruction of civilian infrastructure left behind by General Sherman and the consumption of supplies in South Carolina and Georgia was an effort to stop, demoralize and deplete the Confederate…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Memoirs of General William T. Sherman, it reveals Sherman letters to the Union generals. Sherman letter to General Ulysses S. Grant, commander in chief of all Union forces in the Civil War, he discusses his belief about the size of armies and how that plays into of the nature modern warfare. “We ought to ask our country for the largest possible armies that can be raised...” (McFeely 114). Sherman feels it is important thing as the self- existence of a great nation should not chance war (114). He believes the bigger the army the better. The letter to General John Bell Hood, commander of Confederate Army of Tennessee, discusses their wrangle over the city of Atlanta. Sherman has deemed that citizens now residing in Atlanta should remove. Since Sherman believes that Atlanta is no place for families and his real reasons are they want all houses of Atlanta for military storage and occupation and to contract the lines of defense. Because of these reasons he is providing food and transportation for further north and transportation by cars for Rough and Ready. Sherman letter to General Hood is hoping this proposition of his meets Hood views. Hood response to Sherman letter was he does not consider that he has any alternative in this matter. He describes Sherman removing proposal as “the “unprecedented” measures transcends, in studied and ingenious cruelty, all acts ever before brought to my attention in the dark history of war” (119). Sherman justifies his “unprecedented” measures by referring to General Johnston whom very wise and properly removed the families all the way from Dalton down. Sherman also feels it was unnecessary to appeal to the dark history, when recant and modern examples are so handy. Sherman feels he has not once judged General Hood for his cruelty, so why is his proposal a major concern. “I ask you not to appeal to a just God in such a sacrilegious manner: You who, in the midst of peace and prosperity, have plunged a…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our great army of the Confederacy will keep on fighting for the independence of our nation and stop Grant's army. Our leaders believe he is the Union's greatest commander. We are still holding out hope of defeating Grant. Our army held out for nine months before that against Grant’s army, but our army could not hold out against the continual attacks from Grant.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is a common belief among many historians that history is told through the eyes of the winners. Read any American history book or any world history textbook and they mainly tell you about the hero that saved the nation such as Wellington at Waterloo or General Washington in the Revolutionary War or General Patton in World War II. The case of the American Civil War is no different, especially for a man who changed the war. Ask anybody in the south, even the kindergartners and they will tell you about William Tecumseh Sherman, the man who burned everything. Ask anyone in the North and they’ll tell you how Sherman and Grant together helped the North win the war. General William Tecumseh Sherman constantly said that he disliked war yet when his time came in the Civil War he rose up from a man who was dubbed crazy to become a man who changed war into a concept of total war and would go on to become one of…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the events of world history, the Civil War in the USA is one of the central places. Due to this sombre and mourning event, the current population know the names of Abraham Lincoln, John Brown, Ulysses S. Grant, who stood at the head of armies of the northerners; know the names of General Robert E. Lee, who led the armed forces of the slave owners, fanatic Lincoln's assassin named John Wilkes Booth. It is known, how the war ended and who won it. This creates an extremely dramatic history of this war. It is associated with not only the names of the characters, personifying two warring camps, but many battles, sea battles, the most urgent political debate, skillful diplomatic game, and the Union Confederation (during the war, the North and South of the USA were called). It was seeking to obtain the support of the European powers (South) or, on the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1850's a division in the country between North and South widened. However, in spite of the rising rhetoric, the state of Georgia was far from becoming a "war machine." In Marietta, the Georgia Military Institute went to the state for funds only three times between 1852 and 1863. Throughout the state, railroads were being built up for economic reasons, not reasons of war. Atlanta was concerned about fighting equipment for its newly formed fire department, not for some secret military unit. Life went on "as usual" until the 1860 Presidential campaign.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General William T. Sherman’s Atlanta campaign ensured that reelection victory. This campaign opened the South, which then led to the famous event known as Sherman’s March to the Sea. These events led to Lincoln’s reelection by defeating Johnston’s army, capturing Atlanta, and ripping the heart out of the South. The soldiers of both armies had been fighting for years, war had filled their lives in most aspects, at points the end seemed like it would never come. Boosting the morale of the soldiers meant keeping them going through a very deadly war.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with your statements of the March to the Sea. However, Sherman knew that the Confederacy got their strength from the moral support of the southerners. So, in that ensure destroying them will destroy the Confederacy. Also, the soldiers could burn Barnes and wrecked bridges before the army could reach them. Furthermore, Sherman’s and his troops made it hard for the Conference to fight back. Additionally, agree with you without what Sherman did slavery would’ve probably carry on a little longer, good post.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays