In the article, Is GE food safe?, Anup Shah argues that although there is a possibility the use of GE foods can be beneficial to the general public, it cannot be said that this will last forever. The importance of this dilemma is being measured by the fact that there is absolutely no scientific proof at the moment to predict the effects of these crops in the foreseeable future, though we might know a great deal about their initial benefits to health and industry. David C. Pack agrees with this point of view and states that man has tampered with the very core of our food supply as part of the continuing quest to “out-do” God. He goes on to talk about the ‘unpredictability’ of altering genes. Stating in an example that certain genes from a flounder—a fish—have been inserted into tomatoes in order to give them a longer shelf life and that splicing genetic segments of one species into the genes of another could never occur naturally, he goes on to measure the importance of this issue by comparing data from original research work that had been carried out to determine the relative advantages of ‘golden rice’ and ‘soybeans’ compared to the regular varieties available in the market (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?).
Jeffrey Heit, MD, in Genetically Engineered Foods confirms that that the use of GE foods might entail a cheap and efficient industrial system but the public might not benefit from it the way we think it will. For instance, the use of peanut genes in tomatoes might adversely affect people allergic to peanuts and tomatoes being irreplaceable ingredients in almost all kinds of curry based foods aggravate the situation.
On the other hand, some authors like Amy Norton argue that Vitamin A deficiency can cause blindness and, because it dampens immune system function, leaves children more vulnerable to becoming severely ill from infections. If all children in deprived areas were given enough vitamin A, up to 2.7 million deaths could be prevented each year according to statistics. Genetically engineered capsules rich in vitamin A could be provided to the children in the aforementioned deprived areas. UNICEF has a program to give young children vitamin A capsules twice a year (one capsule is good for a six-month supply of the vitamin). A range of foods naturally contain vitamin A or vitamin A precursors - from liver, fish oil and eggs to spinach, carrots, mango and red peppers. But again, those foods may either be locally unavailable, depend on season, or be priced beyond what most families in developing nations can afford (Amy Norton- Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source 14; Janice Jones- Advantages & Disadvantages of Organic Foods). In another article the author, Bryan Walsh talks about the relationship between ‘humane eggs’ and the way the laying hens are brought up or bred. He hints at the possibility of there being something worse than genetic engineering at hand, which is the way animals are brought up in farms, more specifically chickens. Hence, if such a relationship exists then there seem to be more pressing matters at hand than just the apparent side-effects of GE foods (Bryan Walsh-Vital Farms: Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg). Christie Wilcox adopts a different approach by targeting some of the myths held by people in favor of organic farming as opposed to genetically engineered farming. She talks about how pesticides are used abundantly in organic farming, how organic food is not healthier than GE food and how it is not ideal for the environment; ideas that are common amongst the general public about organic food (Christie Wilcox Myth busting 101: Organic Farming > Conventional Agriculture).
Backing up the aspect that genetically engineered foods are unsafe and should not be distributed to the general public since their after effects have not yet been discovered, Anup Shah states in an article how worldwide polls indicate a high public demand of labeling GE food so as to enable the public to choose their preference of food. She points out that any failure to do so implies that the public is ignorant. Is it ‘justified’ to keep the public in the dark just because we think the public is too ignorant to grasp the significance of GE food? On the other hand, is it okay to not label food as genetically engineered or not genetically engineered because of the growing apprehension that there will be competition between GE based and non GE based food companies? ( Anup Shah- Public Concerns and Protests on GE Food). While some believe that genetically engineered foods are generally regarded as safe. There has been no adequate testing, however, to ensure complete safety. There are no reports of illness or injury due to genetically engineered foods (Jeffrey Heit, MD- Genetically engineered foods).
On the very other end, some people believe that genetically engineered technology is our only hope in abating the ongoing World Hunger problem. However, some people disagree. The idea that genetically engineered technologies can solve world hunger is ‘unreliable’. It might have the ‘potential’ to abet the ‘developing’ nations in fighting the food crisis but it is amongst the many other alternatives present. A significant number of people in the third world countries are unable to get food because it is expensive, not because it is unavailable. As we can see, the issue of a country’s economy is closely tied with the world hunger problem in this case (Anup Shah- GE Technologies will solve world hunger).
There are various questions we need to ask ourselves if we want to determine the ‘safety’ GE food to human beings. In the event that this technology achieves its current aim, who will benefit more, people in need or the people who need more? If we are not able to predict the potential side effects of genetically engineered food, is it safe to miss this one chance to revert poverty or even world hunger for that matter? If not, then will not taking the leap be worth it in the long run? "One reason why GE technology is being given the go-ahead is that there is a lot of money and profit involved in this. Hence from a business perspective it is more favorable, for example to produce crops that can be resistant to your pesticides (so that you can apply more of them)." Keeping this perspective in mind, is it 'moral' to jeopardize the prospect of "hunger free" countries?
Does the expression man 'tampering' with nature also apply to scenarios in which Genetic engineering has helped the human race develop the food market? (David C. Pack-Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy? David C. Pack) The author mentions how the cross breeding of seeds needs to be prevented so as to prevent any food anomalies in the industry. Considering how different animals like cows and buffaloes are cross-bred, how justified is it to combine and merge the habits of different animals who are otherwise different in various aspects?
Whereas the problem of “World Hunger” is concerned, if it cannot be solved by GE crops and is linked to poverty instead, will the eradication of poverty solve the predicament of world hunger? If hunger is an effect of poverty where poverty is a political and economic issue then politics influences how it is produced; who it is produced by and for what purposes it is produced. David C. Pack would also agree: “Even the problem of world hunger cannot be solved using this technology since the yield of GM crops is even lesser than that of natural (regular) crops” (David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy?).
In conclusion, nothing can be said with absolute certainty about the pros and cons of using this kind of technology but what can be done in this field is research in order to determine the magnitude of change it is capable of delivering in the long run.
References
• Alexandra Sifferlin -California fails to pass genetically modified foods labeling initiative http://healthland.time.com/2012/11/07/california-fails-to-pass-gm-foods-labeling-initiative/ • Amy Norton Genetically modified rice a good vitamin A source http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_128308.html
• Anup Shah -Is GE Food Safe? http://www.globalissues.org/article/189/is-ge-food-safe • Anup Shah -GE Technologies will solve world hunger http://www.globalissues.org/article/190/ge-technologies-will-solve-world-hunger
• Anup Shah -Public Concerns and Protests on GE Food http://www.globalissues.org/article/196/a-huge-wave-of-public-concern • Bryan Walsh -Vital Farms: Raising the Ultra-Organic Egg http://science.time.com/2012/10/22/vital-farms-raising-the-ultra-organic-egg/ • Christie Wilcox -Myth busting 101: Organic Farming > Conventional Agriculture http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/2011/07/18/mythbusting-101-organic-farming-conventional-agriculture/ • David C. Pack -Genetically Engineered Foods Why the Controversy? http://realtruth.org/articles/223-gefwtc.html • Janice Jones -Advantages & Disadvantages of Organic Foods http://www.livestrong.com/article/442122-advantages-disadvantages-of-organic-foods/#ixzz2C3XhLvms • Jeffrey Heit, MD -Genetically engineered foods http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002432.htm • Jessica Reaves -Are We Breeding Fruits and Vegetables of Doom? http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,42509,00.html#ixzz2C0gH78SP • Marcy Franklin -Making Sense of Food Labels http://healthland.time.com/2012/10/29/making-sense-of-food-labels/#ixzz2BzpDAylI • Mike Adams- Questioning Genetically Modified Foods - with Jeffrey Smith on the next Natural News Talk Hour http://www.naturalnews.com/030201_GMOs_Jeffrey_Smith.html#ixzz2C2nPVKRa • Genetically engineering 'ethical' babies is a moral obligation, says Oxford professor http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9480372/Genetically-engineering-ethical-babies-is-a-moral-obligation-says-Oxford-professor.html • Robert Sacerich -GMO, Genetically Modified Foods and Conspiracy Theories
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Plessy v. Ferguson is one of the most important and controversial cases in United States history. In 1896 the case was brought to the Supreme Court after defendant Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting on the white side of a train. Plessy who was 1/8 black was arrested and convicted of violating one of Louisiana’s racial segregation laws. The Supreme Court upheld that states were allowed to have segregated facilities for blacks and whites as long as they were “separate but equal”. There was not much support in the cases before to support the Plessy v. Ferguson case. There had been the Dred Scott Decision in 1857, which said blacks were not allowed to become citizens of the United States (later on overturned by the 14th and…
- 1266 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Many opponents of genetically modified foods doubt the safety of those artificial foods. They are the products of people’s intelligence and creativeness, but compared to the eternal law of the nature, human knowledge is not always right. People make mistakes, and sometimes they do not notice about these mistakes until the problems arise. Though developers and manufacturers make sure that there are various advantages of consuming genetically modified foods, due to the potential genetic defects or problems in these foods, they may still damage humans' bodies and undermine the environment. Regarding their benefits such as variation of food choice and the decrease of the cost of food production, genetically modified foods do bring improvements to our…
- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Have you ever heard about the term of genetically-modified foods (GM foods)? Or have you ever seen this kind of foods, like GM tomatoes, in the market? GM foods are the foods that contain the genes transferred from other plant or non-plant organisms. It might be the most controversial topic in the world now. In the article “The False Promise of GMOs”, Joe Pedretti wrote about the argument about the GM foods.…
- 776 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Genetic Modification (GM) or Genetic Engineering (GE) is the process of manipulating genomes from an organism, such as plants and animals, to another using the techniques of biotechnology. Genetic modified foods are created from the procedures of genetic engineering and play an important role in the society’s lifestyle. GM foods can be both beneficial and disadvantageous to the society and environment. It can be advantageous as it can improve agricultural production, help improve nutrition in the body and also contribute to medical research. However it can also be disadvantageous as it may harm organisms in the environment, be a factor of human illnesses and its cost inefficiency.…
- 852 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Genetically Modified Organisms, also known as GMOs, are “living organisms whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated in a laboratory through genetic engineering,” (The Non-GMO Project). While genetic engineering has the capability of being beneficial to our society, The Non-GMO Project argues that it “creates unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and viral genes that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods,” (The Non-GMO Project). GMOs are very prevalent in our contemporary food industry; The Non-GMO Project website states that “in the U.S., GMOs are in as much as 80% of conventional processed food,” (The Non-GMO Project). New traits are introduced to…
- 1519 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Hunger is one of the root causes to poverty due to the exponential growth of the human population. The effects of hunger are diverse and have a negative effect on the growth and life span of a person. Scientists believe that they can help alleviate hunger problems through alteration and modification of genes in foods. The research in this paper will give the pros and cons of GM foods and help answer the following questions that revolve around if society needs genetically modified foods to end global hunger, what are the negative and positive effects of preventing global hunger, what heath issues have been linked to genetic engineered foods, what are the benefits and concerns of genetic engineering foods and what effects genetically modified foods have on the environment.…
- 1819 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Ever since genetically modified organisms (organisms with altered genes to promote a certain desirable trait; GMO for short) have been introduced to the market, large uproars of consumers, politicians, and activists against GMO’s have questioned the necessity and safety of them. But for what? Public and environmental safety has always been a major concern for them, yet, after continuous testing by the FDA, USDA, and EPA, these hypothetical problems have been proven to be just that, hypothetical. Another question presented by these anti-GMO activists is, “What’s in it for me.” To refute all these claims, genetically modified foods are, in fact, healthier for the environment than non-GMO’s, pose no real risk to human health, and are extremely necessary for developing countries with a lacking food supply.…
- 753 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The controversial issue of genetically modified foods, commonly known as GM’s, has only gained the attention of millions, since it became a prominent and highly debated global issue. Genetically modified foods are created when the genes of an organism are engineered and modified to create a new or enhanced version of that organism. The process of using different genes from different sources to genetically modify foods led to public outcry and sometimes, praise. People in support of genetically modified foods claims it will enhance the quality of the food, improve the food’s resistance to pests and other harmful elements, lower food costs, and also increase food security for the future. However, those opposed to genetically modified foods claim…
- 1428 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
How many times have you eaten something without reading the ingredients label? In 1982, Genetically Modified Organisms were approved for human use1 and eventually mass produced to the public as FLAVR SAVR Tomato in the late 1990s.2 Many may think that GMOs will end world hunger, but it is killing us rather than saving us. If food companies continue to advertise GMOs as the savior of America’s hunger problems, the country is in for a surprise. Any food product being sold to the general public should be removed and banned because GMOs contribute to the rise of illness, contaminate the plants in our organic farms, and humans were not made to play god.…
- 713 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After various testing performed by various scientists and experts it “is clearly evident, GM technology can quadruple its maize output, more than triple sweet potato output and increase banana output by eight times” (Wambugu 84). With this much crop increases multiplied by all farms throughout the world mankind can cause world hunger to disappear and replace it with excess food so that none shall have to worry about starving or going hungry ever again. While there are some people who voice their concerns over the safety of genetically modified foods they can be assured that “rigorous testing takes place to ensure GM foods are safe” (Wambugu 82) and as a result “there is no evidence that genetically engineered foods currently on the market pose any human health concern or that they are any less safe than those foods produced through traditional breeding” (Hammerstrom 122). This means that any potential health risks are discovered and rectified before the food is even close to going on the shelves for consumers to purchase. With these potential benefits mixed with the genuine feasibility of achievement they all hold shows that taking the risks involved will be well worth…
- 1423 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
so therefore it doesn 't take much on their part to convince the regulators that…
- 546 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
GE foods have been linked to health hazards. All the genetic alterations scientist are doing to GE foods seem to be cause allergic reactions to some people and introducing new toxins in to our bodies. Also this is introducing new toxins into the environment. In the book, Omnivores Dilemma, the farmer agreed about the health hazards saying that during harvest season that toxins from the crops seep into the water supply and the town is on a boil order, crazy! So our lovely scientist use genetically engineered antibiotic resistance genes which in turn make mutant cells, which means, and stay with me, that the crop contains these genes that are…
- 619 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are overwhelming arguments against genetically modified foods with justifiable reasons against adopting genetically modified foods on a large scale. For this reason, it is critical for all stakeholders to oppose faithfully any effort to try make it seem normal the production and consumption of genetically modified foods in the world. Also, it is important to have adequate legislation to govern the production and marketing of genetically modified food (Jaffe, 2001). In the meantime, the myths and facts of genetically modified foods can only be established precisely through time, experience and unbiased…
- 746 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
World hunger a global crises, excessive food waste, increased carbon footprints and more. The goal was to address these through a technological solution… Biotechnology. “According to [Bill] Gates, to feed the world now, and into the future, we will need 70 per cent more food … And genetically modified food is going to be a big part of that solution.” (Staley pg. 20). Over the years, scientists have strived to develop solutions to many of these problems. Scientists have been able to produce crops that are herbicide tolerant, to help reduce the amount of chemicals used. Robert Fraley, an executive vice president and chief technology officer that has worked at Monsanto for 30 years, when debating for GMFs he mentioned that one of the first GMO products was insulin and the first ever approved for public food consumption is an enzyme that's used to make cheese. He supported the fact that these biotechnologies were meant for the greater good, perhaps one day developing pesticide reducing, self-fertilizing, high yielding, drought and virus resistant crops to name just a few. Most of which over the last 30 years has still yet to come true. The reality is that it is possible for biotechnologies such as GMFs to reach these goals, but not at the cost of current day’s society becoming a lab rat. A society plagued by a multitude of concerns based on the varying risks associated with…
- 844 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
While technology is responsible for some of the most innovative and ingenious inventions of our time, not all technologies contribute positively to society. Genetically Modified Foods are an example of a negative use of technology. Due to insufficient scientific data concerning the safety of these products, and the possible catastrophic consequences resulting from their development, they should be highly monitored by government agencies and immediately banned to protect the public at large…
- 1781 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays