Geology: Un Convention of Law of the Seas

Boomer Flette

Geology

UNCLOS-

Why the United States has not signed the UN Convention of Law of the Seas

The UNCLOS is an agreement that creates the lawful ground under which Somali pirates are put on trial. It also controls the activity in the Polar Regions as it liquefies and weakens the defensive entitlements behind the expanding confidence of the regime of China. The leaders of defense and state departments, together with chief-ranking of army officers in the United States, petitioned the senate to adopt the treaty. Therefore, the administration of Obama’s office legitimately pressed the ratification of the treaty permanently. More than 160 nations have approved the treaty that the United States aided in forming. However, and ironically, the United States still has not approved this treaty. This is majorly due to its critically imminent capability to deal with a variety of demanding problems.

The UNCLOS was concluded in 1982 following ten years of discussions and work. The agreement looked forward to defining the widespread international standards for usage of the seas. These efforts were all in the hope of settling maritime disagreements through a global supervisory authority. This is the prevalent fact for the opponents of the treaty. According to these opponents, exposing the United States to international decrees would weaken the independence of the United States on the high seas. Thirty years later, the United States government is still unable to consent the law because of two key reasons. The first reason is China. During the past few years, China’s government has become more self-confident over its regional allegations to the South China Sea. The Chinese have been trying to impose tenure on long-argued isles in the region. At the same time, they have been looking for ways to hold Navy ships belonging to the United States from plotting these waters. The United States regime together with China’s neighbors has driven the conduction of naval trainings back and openly reinforced regional connections.

Nonetheless, the issue with china is that the center of the dispute comes down to varying translations of the UNCLOS and liberties the agreement offers. The same officers are forcing the United States to disprove this treaty while still discussing with the Chinese government. The other reason for the disapproval of the UNCLOS by the United States is the rise in criticality of the treaty in the Arctic. The United States navy approximates the Arctic region will be free of ice thirty days out of the year by 2040. As the ice liquefies, the arctic is changing and cutting through new shipping routes. As a result, new chances of arriving at vast resources on the seabed are also hindered. As long as the United States has not sanctioned this treaty, it will not gain access to the international group formed by the UNCLOS treaty. This is because the treaty also delegates liberties in these seas. These liberties reveal that other Arctic nations are by now in the process of supporting the treaty.

However, there are uncertainties regarding the allocation of 67 votes required in the senate. The previous era that the UNCLOS was discussed in congress was under the support of the George W. Bush administration. The main supporter of the treaty explained that the work needed on the part of the United States administration is a common case. So common is this case that involves a well-systematized minority to halt something that it is reinforced by the wide majority. Far-rights made use of internationalist risk that they observed in the treaty for fundraising.

Works Cited

"Law of the Sea Treaty." Law of the Sea Treaty. National Center for Public Policy Research, n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. .

"Overview - Convention & Related Agreements." UN News Center. UN, Nov. 2011. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. .

Sandalow, David B. "Should the U.S. Ratify?" The Brookings Institution, 2004. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. .

"The United States and the Law of the Sea: Time to Join | Global Solutions." The United States and the Law of the Sea: Time to Join | Global Solutions. Citizens for Global Solutions, n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. .

Cited: "Law of the Sea Treaty." Law of the Sea Treaty. National Center for Public Policy Research, n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. . "Overview - Convention & Related Agreements." UN News Center. UN, Nov. 2011. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. . Sandalow, David B. "Should the U.S. Ratify?" The Brookings Institution, 2004. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. . "The United States and the Law of the Sea: Time to Join | Global Solutions." The United States and the Law of the Sea: Time to Join | Global Solutions. Citizens for Global Solutions, n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. .