Did you know that soldiers and peasants had to work on the Wall of DBQ in extreme weathers like -20 to -30 degrees, but the peasants and soldiers were doing for the greater good.The Great Wall of DBQ was 13,170 miles long and it took lots and lots of years to complete. The Wall was built with a lot of curves and twists to cover difficult terrain that was the border, like mountains, hills etc. It increased trade and was used for protection from the Xiongnu. Did the benefits of the Great Wall outweigh the human cost. The Great Wall is DBQ of Worth it with some consequence because it increased trade, used for protection from Xiongnu but very harsh conditions and death.…
The founding fathers of America believed in religious freedom, and the right to sue without prosecution, was mandatory for our nation to be free and open minded. Many of these beliefs are solely presented in the 1st amendment. For instance: Thomas Jefferson states in the first part of the one and only sentence in the first paragraph with “Whereas Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness...”. Pretty much, in latent terms, he is implying in this transcript is that we were given the right…
September 11, 2001 was a day that changed the lives of the American people forever. Widespread shock, panic, sadness, pain, and despair flooded our nation as a result of the senseless acts of violence inflicted by terrorists. With the nation reeling from the shock and emotions running high, the American people wanted immediate answers and justice. As if a name or a face to tie to this act would somehow ease the pain left in their hearts. This kind of out cry added extra pressure to former President George W. Bush and his administration to act quickly and give the nation’s people the answers they so desperately craved. In an attempt to have speedy answers Former President Bush went out of his way to go beyond the grasp of the judicial system, which strongly enforces writs of habeas corpus. This strategy utilized by the Bush administration has been a topic of much discussion. The following will examine these questions as well as giving a brief history of habeas corpus. It will then explore the suspension of habeas corpus in the United States, give an analysis of the relevancy of habeas corpus, and explain the Supreme Court’s interpretation of habeas corpus. Finally, it will evaluate four different perspectives on habeas corpus.…
The post WWII United States was a time of great economic growth continued throughout the 50s and 60s. The four commanders in chiefs at the time all had policies that impacted the economy. Between presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson, president Eisenhower handled the economic, diplomatic, social, and political, challenges he faced during the time the best; Every other president had failed in one of the 4 for mentioned categories as opposed to Eisenhower, who was able to effectively handle his economic, diplomatic, social, and political, challenges and steer to country in the right direction.…
The election between Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams was full of controversy. John Quincy Adams’ presidential term was full of in-house problems because of his race being allegedly being helped by Henry Clay which made his constitutional agenda not being pushed in. But if I were to choose a president, I choose John Quincy Adams because he’s very intelligent and is already with good relations with other countries in Europe.…
Habeas Corpus today especially after what happened on September 11th President Bush made many efforts to rescind the constitutional rights of habeas corpus. He wanted to refuse habeas corpus trials to those that were in custody at Guantanamo Bay. The President pushed…
Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidential reign began with the assassination of former president John F. Kennedy in 1963. While the people of the United States tried to recover from the loss of Kennedy, Johnson used it to his advantage. Many citizens did not notice that this was being done, and some even wonder if Johnson himself knew he was using it to his advantage. By him telling America that Kennedy would have wanted the Great Society, the people believed him and went through with it. Many things, both good an bad came out of the Great Society. The Great Society was Johnson’s way of fixing the problems in America, that being the political, emotional and mostly the social problems.…
When the writers of the first ten amendments of the Constitution wrote, them they wanted to protect the rights of the citizens to ensure that ex-post facto could not place their liberties in jeopardy (McAllister, 1927). The protection of freedom in the of our citizens ensures…
Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…
"The history of liberty has largely been the history of observance of procedural safeguards." We agree with this quote because our country is based on the right to have our guaranteed protection of life, liberty and property. Two of the greatest procedural guarantees that insure liberty are the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. According to the Fifth Amendment, a capital crime is punishable by death, while an infamous crime is punishable by death or imprisonment. This amendment guarantees that no one has to stand trial for such a federal crime unless indicted by a grand jury. Further, a person cannot be put in double jeopardy for the same offense by the same government. The amendment also guarantees that a person cannot be forced to testify against himself, and forbids the government from taking a person's…
The Founding Fathers believed that the sanctity of individual rights must be held above all else, due to their prior experiences with the tyrannical rule of King George III of Great Britain. After the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, the United States government has introduced several laws and allowed several actions that compromise the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution in the supposed name of security or the general welfare. These laws include the Espionage Act which was introduced during World War I, and the use and allowance of ‘Stop and Frisk’ procedures amongst America’s various police agencies. The introduction and use of these laws and procedures were meant to keep the American public safe following outbreaks of war and to try and prevent weapon related violence, but they also compromise the liberties that are ensured to the…
Do you recall "For liberty and Justice for all"? Well it seems as if those six words no longer exist in present day America. As a Veteran of the Military, I swore to serve and protect those foreign and domestic. Like many active duty and veteran military, I felt a sense of pride and accomplishment as a soldier knowing that I was fighting for a country where you had civil liberties. At the time it was truly the land of the free and the home of the brave. Unfortunately, those liberties, that most Americans take for granted and others flee to this country to obtain, was threatened on September 11, 2001. The nation suffered from a great deal of loss, pain, anger, and disbelief that was felt across the world. With emotions becoming more inflamed with thoughts of revenge, the American people wanted answers and even more importantly, they wanted to see immediate action against those that commented this act of terror against this great nation. In response, Former-President George W. Bush and his administration set out to capture those thought to be responsible for the terrorist attack. In addition, Former-President Bush and his administration went to great lengths to go beyond the reach of the judicial system which enforces the writ of Habeas Corpus. These actions have been highly debated all across the nation and even the world. Did the tragedy of September 11th, justify the actions of the Former-President? Was and is it fair that people were and are still locked away, stripped of their basic rights under the writ of Habeas Corpus? Is this “Great Nation” so powerful that the very laws that were put into place to protect now don’t apply? The following exams these questions and many more, including the writ of Habeas Corpus, legal debates regarding this topic, and the perspectives of Former-President Bush and his administration during the time immediately following the September 11th attack.…
Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing…
Donald Trump won his presidency over Hilary Clinton, winning the electoral vote but losing the popular vote by around 2.9 million votes. Knowing that the majority of Americans did not want Trump as President, it would make sense for Trump to handle the office with care, and work to gain the trust of the Americans who did not want him as their President. In the short 48 days since Trump has been President, it is safe to say that he does not care about the opinions of those who did not vote for him and those that did vote for him. He signs executive orders and appoints nominees without consideration. He makes every move based on his priorities, and not the rest of America.…
There is a constant struggle for power in today’s society. There are citizens who are defending their rights, such as the freedom to protest, while authority figures try to reprimand them. The people are becoming more united and they are realizing that there is power in numbers, and that scares the government. The three branches have to keep innovating ways to have the people under control, and an effective method that is used is the “scare tactics” method. The government essentially uses guinea pigs, or in this case alleged terrorists, to set example for the other people of what power the government possesses. In the “Power to Kill” an editorial in The New York Times a controversy which involves the American government killing American citizens is brought up. In the editorial it is stated “President Obama, who came to office promising transparency and adherence to the rule of law, has become the first president to claim the legal authority to order an American citizen killed without judicial involvement.” This is a clear example of what the government is capable of. These forms of action should not go by unnoticed and they should not be tolerated, the killing of American citizens executed by the government is a step in the wrong direction. We the people need to keep gathering our strength in numbers and fight for what we believe in.…