George Mason’s “Objections to the Constitution” was published in October. His assertions reached every state, and Anti-Federalists adopted Mason’s work to disagree publicly with the Constitution. Mason was believed to have claimed he would rather cut off his hand than endorse the Constitution. He argued against the absence of a bill of rights and was convinced the House of Representatives was too limited to represent the citizens appropriately, the Senate obtained too much authority, the federal judiciary would damage the state judiciaries, and finally the president would be the tool in the hands of his advisers or of the Senate. Moreover, Mason had been aghast that the Convention permitted the slave trade to remain until 1808.…
Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…
From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation did not provide the U.S. with an effective government because of the weakness of the Articles. The Constitution is stronger and much more effective than the Articles. Under the Articles congress could not collect money, we couldn’t pay our bills, and the government had no good way to stop rebellion. The constitution improved on this in many ways. I don’t think the Articles would be so bad if we did not have to compare them to the much greater Constitution.…
Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…
“From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…
Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…
Starting in August 1774 and trailing all the way to July 1776, Virginia held five Revolutionary Conventions. During these conventions the members formed the Virginia Committee of Safety that governed Virginia between August 1775 and July 1776, organized economic trades of British goods, elected members to Congress, etc. On May 15, 1776, after deciding to declare Virginia independent of Great Britain, at the fifth and final Revolutionary convention of Virginia, the members voted unanimously to prepare a constitution and a statement of laws for Virginia. George Mason was the thirty-second member of the drafting committee and he eventually took over as the man making all of the decisions. Edmund Pendleton, the president of the convention, noted,…
The Articles of Confederation was not an effective government, but rather, a workable one. We must understand that whenever a government is set up so loosely with no able guidelines, problems are bound to occur. The Articles of Confederation was more a “club” than a government. Anyone could leave whenever they so desired. Unfortunately the government did not work, but ironically, the leaders of our country purposely formulated this weak government out of fear of the past. This was an unavoidable…
By late 1786, it was clear to the states that the Articles of Confederation could no longer provide for an adequate government, an essential function to promote the prosperity of the fledgling country. To fix this problem, delegates from all states except Rhode Island congregated in Philadelphia in an attempt to revise the Articles of Confederation. During the convention, the delegates had a variety of views on how the government should function, which led to lengthy and, at times, acrimonious debates. In the end, however, some kind of compromise would always be reached; then another issue would be brought about and the whole cycle repeats over and over again. Sleepless nights and smoke filled rooms followed one after another. Little did the…
With high hopes for the articles, there was great disappointment due to its effectiveness. The articles of confederation failed to provide the United States with an effective government. The central government was designed and planned to be eminently weak. It was formed to defend the states as a whole, but had…
The Constitutional Convention took place in May 1787. Delegates from all of the states except for Rhode Island met in the Philadelphia State House in the exact room that 11 years ago, the Declaration of Independence was signed. There were 55 delegates and most of them were lawyers, merchants, or planters, making them rich and educated men. The Constitutional Convention occurred because many of America’s leaders had become unsatisfied at that time with the government structure by which the Articles of Confederation created. George Mason was chosen to be one of Virginia’s delegates because he had much experience with the government.…
Even though the Articles of Confederation did have some achievements like bringing peace and unity, they were more ineffective than effective for providing a stable government for the United States. The Articles of Confederation were ineffective for these reasons. First, The Articles of Confederation did not allow Congress to impose a tax, so this prevented the new nation of the United States of America to have a strong economic system. Second, The Articles of Confederation prevented the Chief Executive (President) from having any power and thus also having no military. Lastly, The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow the United States to have very good foreign relations with any foreign nation since we were viewed as weak.…
The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…
The simulated Constitution Convention that we held in class today was very eye-opening. Reading about the events that took place that day in Philadelphia, and actually participating in the tedious act certainly put things into perspective. It was interesting to take the concerns of the colonists in 1787 and fight for them as they did 230 years ago. By conducting this experiment, we got the chance to put ourselves in the delegates shoes and voice our apprehensions and get a sense of the hardships they had to face in that Pennsylvania State House the hot summer of 1787. Anyone can research the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention, but by reenacting, and actually revising our own Convention in class, we got a real appreciation of what occurred…
After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country, but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply, recently. In different topics such as Congress, Executive, Judicial and whether we needed to have Bill of Rights or not, both parties debated and found solutions that still after hundreds of years works……