Preview

Georgia V. Randolph Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
Georgia v. Randolph is a landmark case pertaining to the search of a private resident without a search warrant where one resident gives law enforcement personnel consents to conduct a search and the other member objects. This particular case involved a married couple Scott and Janet Randolph, who were having marriage problems. Janet decided to leave Scott taking their son with her to Canada (Wood 2007 para 1). After being gone for a little over a month she and the child returned to the same residents where Scott had remained. One day shortly after her return, they got into an argument and Scott left the resident with their child in fear that she would take off again. Law enforcement personnel were called to their home and she

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the ways to toll the statute of limitations for legal malpractice actions is that the attorney(s) against whom the claim(s) is alleged serve as counsel for the plaintiff on the same subject matter within which the wrongful act or omission occurred. This would seem to require privity between plaintiff and the attorney(s). However, this is not the case when it comes to trustees who are represented in their capacity as fiduciaries.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two days following Davis’s conviction on charges of the murder of Officer Mark MacPhail, jury recommended the death penalty and Davis was sentenced to death. Officer MacPhail’s family wasn’t allowed to testify but Davis comment with; “Spare my life, just give me a second chance. That’s all I ask. I was convicted for offenses that I didn’t commit.” If the victim was still alive to testify, he could have confirmed Davis’s statement or better yet identify the true shooter in the case rather it really was Troy Davis or not.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Criminal Trial of Defendant McKenzie Crowe consisted of several different key factors that contributed to the death of Allison Bell, a beloved grandmother, mother, and sister. On January 28, 2013 at 2:30 a.m., McKenzie Crowe was driving northbound on Cook rd. while the victim Allison Bell was Explorer was totaled. Authorities airlifted Allison to Grady where she was pronounced dead upon arrival.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the case of Hampton v. Snead State Community College (SSCC), the one element that Hampton failed to establish of a prima facie case of racial discrimination was the forth element in the case. The forth element in the case stated, “SSCC treated similarly situated employees outside of Hampton's protected class more favorably” (Hampton). According to the court, Hampton failed to establish the prima facie case of bring substantial evidence of employees of another race who were tried fairly. The plaintiff brought evidence of three colleagues, also coaches, who were White (Adam Rhoden, Steve Machen, and Gerry Ledbetter) who engaged in misconduct and were not demoted or transferred to another division. However, the first two coaches that Hampton supplied, as evidence to the court did not suffice because both coaches, Rhoden and Machen, incident involved another athletic director than whom the plaintiff was suing. The third coach involved in the evidence, Coach Ledbetter, was also deemed an insufficient example because Ledbetter’s misconduct was different than that of the plaintiff. Therefore, since the plaintiff was not able to cover the final element of a prima facie case of racial discrimination, the plaintiff request of summary judgment was denied.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case involved a conflict between the beliefs of the Old Order Amish and government regulations on employment and Social Security. The Amish regard the care of the sick and elderly to be one of their religious obligations; as a consequence, they believe that paying Social Security taxes (designed to care for the sick and elderly) would entail acknowledging that the government had that task rather than they. Thus, paying Social Security taxes would mean denying an important aspect of their faith.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 25, 1931, seven young white men entered a railroad stationmaster's office in northern Alabama. They claimed that while they were riding the rails, a "bunch of Negroes" picked a fight with them and threw them off the train. The stationmaster phoned ahead to the next station, near Scottsboro, Alabama. A Scottsboro deputy sheriff made deputies of every man in town with a gun. When the train stopped, the posse (group of people legally authorized keep the peace) rounded up nine young black men and two young white women. The women, Ruby Bates and Victoria Price, were dressed in men's caps and overalls.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In extreme criminal cases, such as when a defendant has been convicted of deliberately killing another, the careful and judicious use of the death penalty may be appropriate if carefully employed. Georgia's death penalty statute assures the judicious and careful use of the death penalty by requiring a bifurcated proceeding where the trial and sentencing are conducted separately, specific jury findings as to the severity of the crime and the nature of the defendant, and a comparison of each capital sentence's circumstances with other similar cases. Moreover, the Court was not prepared to overrule the Georgia legislature's finding that capital punishment serves as a useful deterrent to future capital crimes and an appropriate means of social retribution against its most serious offenders.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbade the death penalty for the crime of rape of a woman. While serving several sentences for rape, kidnapping, one count of first degree murder, and aggravated assault, Ehrlich Anthony Coker escaped from prison. Coker broke into Allen and Elnita Carver's home near Waycross, Georgia, raped Elnita Carver and stole the family's vehicle. Coker was convicted of rape, armed robbery, and the other offenses. He was sentenced to death on the rape charge after the jury found two of the aggravating circumstances present for imposing such a sentence: that the rape was committed by a person with prior convictions for capital felonies, and that the rape was committed in the course of committing another capital felony—the armed robbery. The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld the sentence.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that whenever an officer restrains the freedom of someone to walk away,…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V Garner Essay

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tennessee v. Garner (1985) is based on an incident that took place October 3, 1974. Briefly, the facts of the case are that a Memphis police officer, Elton Hymon, shot and killed an unarmed fifteen year old, Edward Garner, who was fleeing the scene of a home burglary at approximately 10:45 p.m.. The officer identified himself as the police and gave a command to halt. Garner stopped at the base of a chain-link fence, and then began to scale the fence when Hymon fired a shot, striking Garner in the back of the head which resulted in his death later at a local hospital. Hymon testified he saw no sign of a weapon and was “reasonably sure” and “figured” Garner was unarmed and if he scaled the fence, he would get away (Tennessee v. Garner, 1985, App. 41, 56; Record 219). Hymon believed he was justified in shooting Garner as stated in Tennessee Code Annotated 40-7-108 (1982), "[i]f, after notice of the intention to arrest the defendant, he either flee or forcibly resist, the officer may use all the necessary means to effect the arrest" and congruent with department…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not a lot of people today are racist because of the civil rights movement.The civil rights movement is for the people to be good and they made more laws to make people to be even better.Three Supreme Court cases influenced the civil rights movement by making people to lessen African American:Shelley v. Kraemer,Plessy v. Ferguson,and Brown v. Board of Education.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout my time as a Political Science major a constant topic in the conversations was that of judicial review. My professor’s automatically assume we know everything there is to know about judicial review. So when it comes to the case of Marbury V. Madison I knew the basics of the case but I did not know the reasons and all the facts. When I picked this case it was out of confusion behind the events that gave the Supreme Court its powers. Through examining the legal, environmental and personal perspective of the case we can get to the bottom of why they ruled way they did.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have gone through all the assigned cases and I must admit it constituted one of the most challenging I have read thus far. Most of the legal jargons are notoriously difficult to comprehend. However, I braved the terms and what not coupled with patience and I did find a tiny light at the end of the tunnel. Among the three cases, I find King v. Burwell case interesting, in a sense, for the reason that the arguments raised in the case were about the subsidies for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the likelihood that it could undermine the healthcare law by holding up federal subsidies that assist the low-income strata with the payment of their health insurance. The debate raised by King and three other Virginia residents’…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays