Germany Depth Studies: Nazi Domestic Policy

e.g. Anti-Left; loyal to the government sympathisers of Freikorps; links with the wealthy; financed espionage and, secretly, the Nazis etc. (3 – 4) Level 3 – Supports valid inferences with reference to the source e.g. ‘Massacred communists’; restored Right-wing; used ‘secret army funds’; money from capitalists’ etc. (5 – 6) (ii) Level 0 – No evidence submitted or response does not address the question (0) Level 1 – Agrees OR disagrees, unsupported from the source. (1 – 2) Level 2 – Agrees OR disagrees, supported from the source e.g. Yes Support of Ludendorff; publicity; ban brief; SA growing; switch to legal means etc. No Putsch failed; seats falling and only gained 3% of the popular vote; Hitler imprisoned; Rohm went to South America etc. (3 – 5) Level 3 – Agrees AND disagrees, supported from the source. Addresses the issue of ‘How far?’ (6 – 7) (iii) Level 0 – No evidence submitted or response does not address the question (0) Level 1 – Useful/not useful – Choice made on the basis that one is more detailed/gives more information, but does not specify what information. (1) Level 2 – Useful/not useful – One is history of the German Army, the other is by a German so they could both be biased/unreliable. (2) Level 3 – Choice made on the nature or amount of information given. Must state what information. (3 – 5) Level 4 – Choice made on the grounds of reliability. Discussion of utility must be made on valid evaluation of source(s) in context. Include at this Level answers that cross-reference between A and B to show reliability. 6 marks for one source, 7 marks for both. (6 – 7) (b) (i) Level 0 – No evidence submitted or response does not address the question (0) Level 1 – One mark for each valid aspect to a maximum of two e.g. All over 20 could vote; secret ballot; proportional representation; election every 4 years; separate election for Presidency etc.