Preview

Gerrymandering: United States and Congressional Apportionment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerrymandering: United States and Congressional Apportionment
Congressional Apportionment is the process by which the United States House of Representatives are redistricted the fifty states following each constitutionally mandated decennial census. Each state is guaranteed at least one seat and all the other seats are divided among the rest of the states based on their population. Congressional Apportionment is important to the states because the more representatives a state has the more influence they have in the House and vice versa the states do not want to lose seats in the House.
Congressional redistricting is the process of redrawing district boundaries when a state has more representatives than districts. The Senate does not take part in the redistricting process. Redistricting occurs every ten years, with the national census.
Gerrymandering is a practice that attempts to establish a political advantage for a particular political party or group by manipulating geographic boundaries to create partisan, incumbent-protected districts. In order to protect incumbents and to discourage challengers by creating a district that is more populated with a certain political ideology over another to insure a politician’s chance of winning. Gerrymandering is also used in order, to enhance a political party’s strength by having a certain political parties in a district to ensure that the Democrats or Republicans win every election.
The Supreme Court has placed limits on racial gerrymandering and ensuring that the districts are equally populated. Racial gerrymandering is the drawing of a district to favor one racial group over another. The Supreme Court outlawed racial gerrymandering, which prevented Southern African Americans from voting and becoming the majority. The Supreme Court also disallows majority-minority districts. The Supreme Court has also ruled that the districts must be equally populated; the districts are required to have the same number of people, so each state takes the number of people they found in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering is a practice used when electoral districts are being set and are used to create a political advantage for specific group or party by manipulating district boundaries. For example, if one state was more likely to vote Republican you could have the area redrawn into an opposing district to win to allow better results for the opposing party.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reapportionment- is the process of allotting congressional seats to each state following the census according to their proportion of the population. Some states will get more or less seats for representative based on population change.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attorney General rejected it because the plan created only one black-majority district. NC then gave a second plan making two black-majority districts, one of which was no wider than the interstate road along with it stretched. Five residents of NC challenged the constitutionality of this shaped district, saying that its only point was to secure the election of additional black representatives. The District Court (3judges) held that they failed to state a constitutional claim, the residents of NC then appealed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Did the North Carolina residents' claim, that the State created a racially gerrymandered district, raise a valid constitutional issue under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause? Yes, the Court ruled that even though NC's reapportionment plan was racially neutral on its face, the resultant district shape was unusual enough to say that it made an effort to separate voters into districts based on race. The Court stated that the District Court would have to decide whether or not some convincing governmental interest justified NC's…

    • 3484 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is like a game, call it the redistricting game. Gerrymandering is an act that tries to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group. Although the Supreme Court ruled gerrymandering unconstitutional in 1986, it could possibly challenge in court. To sum gerrymandering up in a sentence. The main purpose of redistricting is to allow fewer districts for a politician opponent. They take parts of a states that they feel like would think, communicate, have the same skin color or act like there opponent and the attempt to make as few districts including them as possible. Doing this gives that candidate a higher chance of getting votes of the people in other districts. Virginia is considered to be one of the most gerrymandered…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today the United States uses a process called single member representation. This has been the process the United States has been using since the United States was first established. This had been very effective until now. The reality is that this is greatly underrepresentation of the smaller parties. Proportional Representation is a better system in a number of ways; there would be less issues with gerrymandering, there would be a rise in the number of voters, there would be much better representation, and there would be more sexual equality in Congress.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering Research Paper Why was there a need to draw lines that create voting districts? The constitution set up the initial way each state would be represented and gave representatives (House of Representatives) that were determined according to population and guaranteed the number of representatives (Senate) that each state would have. The lines were needed to give equal representation for all the districts. Gerrymandering is the illegal practice of redrawing the congressional district lines in such a way as to favor one political party over another. In 1812, then Governor Eldridge Gerry signed a bill that redistricted Massachusetts.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is not just a theoretical, but also a plausible problem that has occurred four times out of the fifty-six elections that have taken place: once in 1824 with Andrew Jackson, then in 1876 with Rutherford B. Hayes, then 1888 with Grover Cleveland, and in 2000 with Al Gore. The second problem is the distortion created by the unequal distribution of votes according to population. Each state is only allowed a single Electoral vote which consequently causes suggestive overrepresentation of less populated…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meet Your Rep

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I reside in California's 6th district and Doris O. Matsui is the congresswoman for this district. She was elected when she ran for the open seat that was created upon her husband's (Robert Matsui) death in January 2005. Each district now represents more than 700,000 constituents rather than the original 30,000 as intended by the Framers of the Constitution, because of a 1929 law that changed the procedure and froze the House of Representatives to its 435 member level. (Levin-Waldman, 2012). Until 1929 it was growing every census as populations grew. Matsui's district is not so much Gerrymandered as it is simply been held by the Democrats since the mid 1970's. and the name recognition gained by her husband Robert Matsui.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right now the Republicans have the majority, but it is estimated that if Clinton wins it could flip the House. Most people tend to vote strictly for their party’s candidates, but this election could cause some of them to split ticket vote. Although it is predicted that if Clinton leads by 10 points that she has a chance of giving the Democrats a lead in the House this is unlikely due to the fact that Gerrymandering is popular among the republican states. Gerrymandering is the art of redistricting in a way to help the incumbent, by concentrating or diluting the minorities, so that the incumbent’s party is likely to win, while discouraging other possible candidates for Congressional office. If the majority party changes in the House then that would drastically change the kind of policies that are made because a different party, the Democrats, would be the majority and someone from that party would become the majority leader, while the Republican Party would have to step down and become to minority…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays