Ghemawat's View On Globalization
The globalization debate pits the opinions of Thomas Friedman against those of Pankaj Ghemawat. Their differing views help you better understand the context of international business.
What do these men's ideas say to you about globalization?
The Friedman against Ghemawat debate discussed different views on globalization. Friedman says that the world is flat and give ten reasons as to way this has happened. Ghemawat has a different view of the world. I feel he mocks everything that Friedman has to say about globalization. It tells me that there is no right or wrong answer to globalization.
Through the exposure of Friedman's ideas, what are the forces or flatteners that make cross-border business more prominent?
(1) new software and increased …show more content…
In the bottom of our text, it says that Ghemawat portrays the world that is “semiglobalized” and “multi-domestic,” where global strategy begins with noticing national differences. I feel that he would say that he does not like what Friedman has done or is doing. I feel that he would tell Friedman that he does not like what he has done. I think there would be great conflict between the two of them (Ghemawat, …show more content…
Get the facts and evaluate alternative actions along with test your decision and just do it, but what did you learn (Markkula, 2009?) I feel that this five-step are important before making the decision. I feel that it is important that for me if I am uncomfortable in making a decision that I seek help with it. I also feel it very important for me to have all the facts before making a decision. Looking at other options that are out there are important to me as well. I would want to be able to explain my decision to anyone that I needed to. So rethinking the decision is very important to me. I also feel looking back on the decision that I make are important. If there is something that I can change and make it better, then I would do
What do these men's ideas say to you about globalization?
The Friedman against Ghemawat debate discussed different views on globalization. Friedman says that the world is flat and give ten reasons as to way this has happened. Ghemawat has a different view of the world. I feel he mocks everything that Friedman has to say about globalization. It tells me that there is no right or wrong answer to globalization.
Through the exposure of Friedman's ideas, what are the forces or flatteners that make cross-border business more prominent?
(1) new software and increased …show more content…
In the bottom of our text, it says that Ghemawat portrays the world that is “semiglobalized” and “multi-domestic,” where global strategy begins with noticing national differences. I feel that he would say that he does not like what Friedman has done or is doing. I feel that he would tell Friedman that he does not like what he has done. I think there would be great conflict between the two of them (Ghemawat, …show more content…
Get the facts and evaluate alternative actions along with test your decision and just do it, but what did you learn (Markkula, 2009?) I feel that this five-step are important before making the decision. I feel that it is important that for me if I am uncomfortable in making a decision that I seek help with it. I also feel it very important for me to have all the facts before making a decision. Looking at other options that are out there are important to me as well. I would want to be able to explain my decision to anyone that I needed to. So rethinking the decision is very important to me. I also feel looking back on the decision that I make are important. If there is something that I can change and make it better, then I would do