In a book titled, Unruly tongue: identity and voice in American women's writing, 1850-1930, writer Martha J. Cutter describes the Gibson Girl as “pure, noble, and passive-- defendable but not a defender... although she may have the voice of the New Woman, she does not use it to break with a historically constrained vision of women's speech”. This idea is supported once more by Martha Kennedy as she reveals that the Gibson Girl never “seriously challenged the patriarchal tradition...”. Even Charles Gibson himself made this evident, as the title of one of his Gibson Girl Illustrations, shown below, is “Not Worrying About Her Rights”. The Gibson Girl believes and supports her rights, but does nothing to defend them. This piece of the Gibson personality gives insight to the apparent ideal female personality of the time; beautiful, intelligent, and informed... but undeniably passive and un-feminist. As stated in an article on associatedcontent.com, The Gibson Girl “would never be as bold as to be a part of the suffrage movement...” She was “progressive in that she was allowed to think, but she was not allowed to act upon her thoughts or lobby for social change”
In a book titled, Unruly tongue: identity and voice in American women's writing, 1850-1930, writer Martha J. Cutter describes the Gibson Girl as “pure, noble, and passive-- defendable but not a defender... although she may have the voice of the New Woman, she does not use it to break with a historically constrained vision of women's speech”. This idea is supported once more by Martha Kennedy as she reveals that the Gibson Girl never “seriously challenged the patriarchal tradition...”. Even Charles Gibson himself made this evident, as the title of one of his Gibson Girl Illustrations, shown below, is “Not Worrying About Her Rights”. The Gibson Girl believes and supports her rights, but does nothing to defend them. This piece of the Gibson personality gives insight to the apparent ideal female personality of the time; beautiful, intelligent, and informed... but undeniably passive and un-feminist. As stated in an article on associatedcontent.com, The Gibson Girl “would never be as bold as to be a part of the suffrage movement...” She was “progressive in that she was allowed to think, but she was not allowed to act upon her thoughts or lobby for social change”