Macbeth used the murder of Duncan to get the throne. He originally could not force himself to do it. It was the influence of Lady Macbeth, “when you durst do it, then you were a man.” (1.7.56). She is the one who achieved the throne for him. Besides being easily influenced by others, these two men have more faults. I was under the belief that heroes should be courageous and self-sufficient. This clearly isn’t the case here because Gilgamesh is dependent upon Enkidu and Macbeth was dependent on Lady Macbeth. Both men appear to be strong rulers when they’re actually weak. Gilgamesh starts running the streets “raping any woman who struck his fancy” (1). A good leader would never do such things. Macbeth appears to be powerful but, doesn’t actually have the skills to rule, and this is evident by the way he allows Lady Macbeth to control him. In conclusion, Gilgamesh and Macbeth have many connections. They are in power but cannot stand on their own and fully take on the responsibilities of being a leader.
Macbeth used the murder of Duncan to get the throne. He originally could not force himself to do it. It was the influence of Lady Macbeth, “when you durst do it, then you were a man.” (1.7.56). She is the one who achieved the throne for him. Besides being easily influenced by others, these two men have more faults. I was under the belief that heroes should be courageous and self-sufficient. This clearly isn’t the case here because Gilgamesh is dependent upon Enkidu and Macbeth was dependent on Lady Macbeth. Both men appear to be strong rulers when they’re actually weak. Gilgamesh starts running the streets “raping any woman who struck his fancy” (1). A good leader would never do such things. Macbeth appears to be powerful but, doesn’t actually have the skills to rule, and this is evident by the way he allows Lady Macbeth to control him. In conclusion, Gilgamesh and Macbeth have many connections. They are in power but cannot stand on their own and fully take on the responsibilities of being a leader.