Preview

Gillette's Acquisition of Duracell

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gillette's Acquisition of Duracell
Key Issues

The Gillette Company was founded in 1901 in a small office in Boston. Since its departure, Gillette has positioned itself as one of the most recognizable brands not only through their safety razor blades, but also through corporate diversification. This included the acquisition of a number of major companies, most recently Duracell. Prior to this acquisition, the Duracell Corporation had been the leading producer of alkaline batteries in the United States and maintained consistent growth in revenues from 1991-1996. Since their purchase of Duracell, their stock price has fallen 45% to a low of $34. The issue for Gillette is to determine if they can promote the profitable growth of their acquisition.

Decision Criteria

The main criteria that will be used to evaluate the key issues Duracell is currently facing, is weather Gillette 's acquisition does in fact create a good synergy between the two companies (Gillette & Duracell). A synergy can be defined as the working of two things together, to produce an effect that 's greater than their individual parts. Therefore, one must evaluate whether the acquisition was actually in the company 's best interest. This is tied into the second decision criteria, growth. Gillette needs to ensure that the growth of their company, as well as their new acquisition, Duracell 's growth remains profitable. Prior to the acquisition of Duracell, Gillette had been experiencing a consistent growth of 17% per year for the previous six years and was the industry leader in the personal shaver industry.

Analysis

External: The external environment in which Duracell is operating holds many interesting characteristics, which we can use and analyze in order to see how Duracell compares to the competition. Porters 5 forces of competition illustrate a very useful outline for us to analyze the current competition in the battery industry. Duracell holds a competitive advantage with resources available to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Market leaders: Duracel and Energizer (80% market share)  adaptation to consumer needs and valuable negotiating power with retailers…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1996, Gillette acquired Duracell batteries for $7.3 billion in stock. The purchase was met with optimism not only by Gillette's senior management and its highly visible director, Warren Buffett, but also by Wall Street analysts. Despite the initial enthusiasm, Duracell had become a drain on Gillette's performance and had brought an end to Gillette's impressive earnings growth history. It had also cost Michael Hawley, a former CEO, his job after only 18 months in the position, due to his inability to turn around the financial hemorrhaging at the Duracell division.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Duracell Division of Gillette has lost market share and failed to move forward in the last four years, which may be the result of a lack of strategic vision and/or mandate from Gillette’s Board of Directors. It is our opinion that perhaps too much emphasis or “hype” was placed on the acquisitions potential and not enough effort has been re-focused on maintaining the Duracell Division itself.…

    • 4251 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The acquisition of Duracell was seen as many as a smart move. Analyst, shareholders, executives, had high expectations with this merger. Unfortunately, this acquisition created several problems for Gillette since their main goal of profit maximization was not being accomplished.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back Bay Battery Strategy

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Market data analysis stressed two main facts: i) the promising potential of ultracapacitors and ii) surfacing mature market conditions for conventional NiMH batteries. The first piece of information implied that it would be critical to beat the competition and be the first company to offer customers the features and benefits they demanded in the new product. That would have allowed Back Bay to gain a competitive advantage and keep existing customers (that could easily switch from the company’s conventional batteries to the company’s ultracapacitors) as well as attract new ones. The second piece of information implied that demand for my core business products would soon start to decline and that a price war would be inevitable. It became clear to me that to sustain growth for Back Bay I had to focus my R&D efforts on innovative products as demand for NiMH batteries would slowly drift away towards the adoption of new technologies. From a financial standpoint, it was important to do it while my NiMH business was highly profitable so that I could use the cash it generated to fund innovation in the ultracapacitors line. For these reasons, my strategy was to invest heavily in:…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rayovac Case

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    o Competitors use merging with other consumer goods companies to leverage relationships across brands (Duracell owned by Proctor and Gamble; Energizer through its own acquisitions);…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, Gillette’s operating segments include personal grooming, small appliances, and oral care products, and the portable power segment. In the portable power segment, Duracell’s major competitors consist of Energizer and Rayovac while new and emerging ones included Sony, Kodak, Panasonic, and other private label brands. The collective entrance of these competitors in the 1990s is the primary reasons for Gillette’s lack of success in the battery industry, discussed below.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It may appear that Gillette shareholders are getting a good deal; however, they could be getting a better deal. Gillette should receive closer to $60/share, and while an offer of $54.05 is a deal that is not as good as it could be, it is better than no deal at all. Using transaction multiples, we see that Gillette is being valued well above the market in valuations involving revenues, EBITDA and P/E multiples. Also, large benefits come to shareholders in the method of acquisition. Although it is an all-stock deal, shareholders are receiving a nearly 1-for-1 ratio of trade for the shares. However, P&G agreed to begin repurchasing stock over an 18 month period. Thus, shareholders are provided with a tax-free transaction or the opportunity to continue to be involved in the future of Gillette and P&G. That being said, one method of valuation using precedent transactions shows that P&G’s premium offer over Gillette’s share price is well below historical averages. With only a 20.1% premium compared to a ~50% premium from precedent transaction, it seems that Gillette shareholders should be looking for a higher premium. Also, a discounted cash flow of Gillette on a standalone basis values Gillette at $47.10 which is more than its current stock price, so when P&G offers a 20% premium on the $45 stock price, it really is only offering a ~15% premium on its projected value. Gillette shareholders are not receiving as much as they could, mostly due to the under valuing of the merger synergies.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gillette has also adopted the top spots worldwide in writing instruments: Paper Mate, Parker, and Waterman brands to name a few. There were also the joining of oral care products , Oral-B, and alkaline batteries – Duracell products, which generate almost one-fourth of company profits.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2 1 Google, Inc. & Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. A Non-­‐Horizontal Merger & Acquisition Case Maastricht University School of Business and Economics Maastricht, 04 April 2012 Name: Gregor Hohls ID: i6001867 Study: International Business Economics Course: International Competition Policy Course Code: EBC2093 Group Number: 02 Tutor Name: G. Valletta Writing Assignment: Final Case Study Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.…

    • 5030 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Gillette Company , was founded in 1901 by inventor King C. Gillette. It was a leading international manufacturer of consumer products ranging from electric razors to ballpoint pens. Gillette has three divisions:…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procter and Gamble

    • 5902 Words
    • 24 Pages

    “P&G Signs Deal to Acquire The Gillette Company: Raises Long-Term Sales Growth Outlook”, The Procter & Gamble Company,January 28, 2005…

    • 5902 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gillette protects its industry leadership on the back of intensive expenditure in R&D and the careful recording of the experiences that men have using Gillette razors. Armed with its superior knowledge on shavers and shaving, Gillette manages to outgun the competition by constantly leaping forward with novel products, which therefore have superior quality.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In November 2004, Jim Kilts called A.G. Lafley at P&G’s Cincinnati headquarters. Kilts, who had been Chairman and CEO of Gillette for 4 years, was seeking a buyer of the global Boston-based company. Lafley, who had been Chairman and CEO of P&G for over 4 years, was out of the office and had to call him back, unaware of what Kilts was about to propose.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gsm Questions

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Does Procter & Gamble’s business line-up exhibit good resource fit? How do Gillette’s profit margins compare to the profit margins for P&G’s businesses for the 2000-June 2005 time periods? Do both companies have similar growth rates and debt structures? How do the free cash flow and free cash flow productivity rates compare for the two companies? Does it seem that the addition of Gillette’s business units will boost the P&G’s bottom line?…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics