Berger, John, Sven Blomberg, Chris Fox, Michael Dibb, and Richard …show more content…
It examines many of the same theoretical concepts that Intertextuality does and reinforces many of the same ideas and concepts, and it does help reinforce my own understanding of intertextuality in order for me to move forward with my essay. The book also looks at the theories and concepts that led to the development of intertextuality. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices defines intertextuality this way: “The theory of intertextuality insists that a text (from the moment to be understood in the narrower sense) cannot exist as a hermetic or self-sufficient whole, and so does not function as a closed system” (1). Unlike Intertextuality, Intertextuality: Theories and Practices looks closely at the ways intertextuality has actually been put into practice in analyzing