Social networking has become the most prominent way to connect oneself to another. Twitter, Facebook, Vine, and other now big social networking sites have become one of the most important ways to connect and to use those connections to create change or to join others who are involved in social change. Gladwell introduces the idea in Small Change that “The world, we are told, is in the midst of a revolution” (232). Communication is being altered daily, and over the years has changed from social activism sparked only by person-to-person contact, to telephone conversations, and to the Internet and social media sites. Strong ties and weak ties are both necessary to create social change because getting involved without social networking is an effective way to act on a cause, and although social networking can be helpful in connecting people together, there will be no real action taken to help a certain cause. People all over the world use social networking sites as a way to find different causes and ways to get involved. The total number of active Twitter users is approximately 554,750,000, with the average number of tweets sent out per day being approximately 58 million. Closely related to Twitter, the total number of active Facebook users is over a billion (Twitter, and Huffington Post). These numbers are incredible and are growing each day. Going on one of these social networking sites allows a person to “follow” or “add” an abundance of new acquaintances. These people may lead one to find a certain cause that interests him or her, maybe a protest or a charity. In a way, one might say that the weak ties created by these sites will lead a person to do more and to act on a cause they may find, but there is no real personal tie that connects one person to another. Gladwell states “In other words, Facebook activism succeeds not by motivating people to make a real sacrifice but by motivating them to do the things that people do when they are not motivated enough to make a real sacrifice” (235). Gladwell explains that social networking sites may have the effect to make someone feel as though they are doing something and making a difference, but in reality that person is simply pretending to do something important. Strong ties are what really motivate people all over the world to take action. To meet someone or to find something that a person believes in without using Facebook or Twitter helps to create strong ties. Getting involved in a protest, going to a soup kitchen or an animal shelter and making a real change is more important then simply “liking” or “re-tweeting”. During the Civil Rights Movement, the protests had an impact on people. In Small Change, Gladwell begins to tell the story of four college students who were refused service at a restaurant because of the color of their skin. The four boys refused to leave after being rejected, and as a result, this began a protest. Gladwell states “By next morning, the protest had grown to twenty seven men and four women, most from the same dormitory as the original four” (Gladwell 231). These four boys made an impact on another group of people, which then started a domino effect. More and more people came to support the boys and what they were doing; strong ties working in ways that the weak ties of social networking could not have possibly done.
Weak ties can give someone an abundance of new information or allow one to express their true feelings or beliefs. Although weak ties can be helpful in certain ways, without a real connection to someone or something, how will your actions over a social networking site have any impact at all in reality? There are ways to turn a social activity over the Internet into reality, but it is more effective to create change through strong, personal ties. In high school, there were many charitable clubs to join. There were people I could talk to or flyers I could pick up, but the main approach was over Facebook. A Facebook group was made for a certain club, and I would join along with up to a hundred students from my school all looking to learn more about this club. I would read the description, and the leaders of the club would post meeting times or activities on weekends that anyone could go to. Sometimes, these groups worked. Students would show up to meetings, or show up to a soup kitchen or a charity walk. Although sometimes these weak ties could produce something great, sometimes these connections would fall apart. Nobody would show up, or they would, and then do absolutely nothing that could possibly benefit the charity in any way. The club was simply a way to write down community service hours, or donate a few dollars and say that they had made a change. The way a person would find out about this would be a large public announcement over social media, where a large amount of people would see and do the same things. Weak ties can most certainly create real change, and sometimes all it takes is one person to “tweet” about a cause to create a wave. “Twitter is a way of following (or being followed by) people you may never have met. Facebook is a tool for efficiently managing your acquaintances…” (234). Gladwell introduces the belief that although the weak ties of these social media sites are ways to connect, to really make an impact, a connection on a personal level is necessary. Thousands of people can join in, and actually take action and really get involved in what they believe in. Social networking and social activism are sometimes necessary for one another, and sometimes weak ties truly can create measurable change in the world. A seven second video on Vine about an important charity, or a short 100 character tweet about a way to donate to an important cause can really make a person want to go out and help create the change that they know is possible, but how many people involved in a cause over the Internet actually get up and do something? Gladwell explains that personal connections are more effective as he states “One study of the Red Brigades, the Italian terrorist group of the nineteen-seventies, found that seventy per cent of recruits had at least one good friend already in the organization” (233). Weak ties can occasionally create the same effect as strong ties, and having a connection with someone does not necessarily mean that they will automatically have more of an impact on society than a person who takes action having only weak ties with a person or multiple people they meet over the Internet. Weak ties can bring people together, but strong ties and strong social contact is more effective and can make more of a difference. High-risk activism is extremely important in creating change world-wide. Without high-risk activism, there would be no risks taken, and no real change from some very important causes. “High-risk activism, McAdam concluded, is a “strong tie” phenomenon” (Gladwell 233). People all around the globe can be involved in something important via Facebook, but most of these people feel more comfortable sitting in front of a screen as opposed to getting up and doing something about what they believe in. If the goal of posting a picture or a status about a movement is to bring that problem to light, then yes, it is successful, but this does not change anything. One will very rarely, if ever, see a revolution begin over a simple tweet or status. Eventually, I believe that social media will become the most prominent way to get involved. It does give someone information about a certain cause that maybe they would not have known of otherwise. Of course the people around me do not know of everything, and I have certainly learned some important things over the Internet, but a personal connection and a strong tie can lead to people taking real action on something that is important to them. Small Change by Malcolm Gladwell argues that social networking such as Facebook and Twitter create only weak ties that cannot truly connect people to a certain cause or belief. Although it can be argued that weak ties can lead to stronger ties, stronger ties and stronger connections lead people to take action and create greater change in what they believe in. Having a personal connection with another person or a group of people helps motivate one to take action and do something important, whether it be participating in a protest or helping out at a soup kitchen. Making a difference can be possible by both weak and strong ties, but to have a strong, personal tie with another person or a cause can really make a different in the world.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The central premise of both Malcolm Gladwell’s article “Small Change: Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” and Zizi Papacharissi’s book Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics is to discuss the ways in which social media platforms such as Twitter can serve as communication tools that foster action for various causes. In his article, Gladwell notes that some scholars believe that the internet and social media platforms enable an upgraded and new model of activism due to the “ease” and speed” of mobilizing causes through such outlets (Gladwell, pp. 8-9). However, Gladwell rejects such a simple assertion and, instead, argues that although these platforms can help mobilize particular movements, they alone are not enough to maintain…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
However, the power of the internet has proven to make significant changes to our society. Through the internet and social media, it has been made easier to connect with an abundance…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Malcolm Gladwell wrote the article “Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted” to inform the world about networks such as Twitter or Facebook and their uses. Gladwell starts off by explaining how networks worked before these websites were created. He talks about how civil rights movements circulated through the country in a short period of time without the use of social networking. Then Gladwell explains the facts of why these social networks will not work in large networking situations.…
- 612 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout Malcolm Gladwell's, "Small Change", he assesses the difference between strong-tie activism and weak-tie activism. Strong ties are the relationships between us and those we are closest to, our friends and family. This type of bond enables true social activism because we are committed to the relationships and are more likely to be compelled to take a stand and fight for change. Weak ties, on the other hand, are described as the type of relationship we have with our "friends" online. These relationships are far more fragile than strong ties because of their foundation of distance.…
- 345 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Gladwell believes that “social networks are effective at increasing participation- by lessening the level of motivation that participation requires” (Gladwell). In other words, it is a good way of informing a high volume of people about a certain issue, but they are not going to be as passionate and motivated to make a change, like high- risk activists use. In the article, Small Change: Why Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted, Gladwell states the types of connections that social networks can created between people. A strong- tie connection means that two individuals are friends; and have a personal relationship with each other. Whereas a weak- tie connection is just an acquaintance or someone you may have not even met.…
- 760 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Again, Gladwell uses a rhetorical question to emphasize the importance of Langan’s method of transportation.…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Let’s get this straight first. I actually applaud Malcolm Gladwell for writing his book Outliers. His theories throughout the book touched ideas that I wouldn’t even begin to think about or question. He gave support for his theories and spent a lot of time describing occurrences that seemed to prove them (as you can guess I’m a bit skeptical about some). I actually enjoyed reading once I got myself to actually focus and read. You see, it’s not the type of book that you don’t want to put down; it’s more of the book that you can effectively read a chapter or two without getting bored. There were just some things that I had a problem with while reading this book that I can’t seem to wrap my head around.…
- 865 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Malcolm Gladwell’s arguments center around an idea he calls “thin-slicing.” Thin-slicing is the concept that our unconscious can take lightning-quick bits of experiences and use preconceived notions about behaviors and situations to interpret them. Our unconscious thin-slices the world around us on a constantly– every person we meet or even already know we thin-slice. In times of panic, our brains rely on those split-second decisions based on what we have unconsciously observed. The reactions that we have from thin-slicing are sometimes called one’s basic instincts: the inkling inside of you that you may or may not understand. This is where Gladwell gets into the idea that even when your unconscious brings these thin-slices to your conscious attention, you probably still won’t know why you feel the way you do about things. The little connections that your unconscious brain makes are behind a set of locked doors. It’s a bit off-putting to know that your brain is doing things completely unaware of what in this class we would call one’s I-function.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many are saying that social media is the new platform for large-scale change. Campaigns are turning towards social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, to gain support for their causes. Not only are companies and larger organizations using social networking sites (SNS) to promote change, but also everyday citizens are sharing their personal stories to motivate people to take action. But, is social media actually a strong platform for activism? Author Malcolm Gladwell, doesn’t think so. In Gladwell’s paper Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted, he argues that social media does not result in large-scale change. Instead of promoting change social media promotes participation (Gladwell, 2015). Many other writers agree,…
- 1723 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Gladwell argues that success is not the result of innate talent, but of practice and of being in the right place at the right time. Critically evaluate this argument.…
- 1781 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
To begin, technology and social media gives people support and it also brings people together, it can bring people together who are thousands of miles apart. One example is “based on a representative survey…
- 637 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises many questions about the potential contributions web-based social networking has attributed to the emergence of progressive social movement and change. "The revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism, which is a bold assertion, given the impact that social media has on today’s society. Gladwell believes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces will require both strong ties among all involved parties and the presence of the hierarchical organizations. In contrast, Gladwell characterizes the social networks as an interwoven…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Malcolm Gladwell is the writer of books and for New Yorker Magazine. His books are generally categorized under the category of “Self-improvement”. However, in my opinion, he is not one of that self-improvement trashes. You can see that he does really research for his books. Just take a look into his “cites”. Even this made him different them from those I called trash. He is not putting an exact way on you, he does not tell you what to do, as if you are beginning to use a new software on your computer. He just narrates the stories and researches the reasons behind them, then convey you those as they are. And so readers can take parts of his writings which work for themselves.…
- 801 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
What is connection? Connection is a relationship in which a person, thing, or idea is linked or associated with something else; for example: two people connecting via Facebook. What is communication? Communication is the imparting or exchanging of information or news; for example: two people exchanging information to one another. In Sherry Turkle’s article, “The Flight from Conversation”, she explains how social media websites such as Facebook can hinder people from the physical and verbal realm of communication. Although Turkle backs her argument well, I disagree with her in the sense that social media acts as a villain in this case because Facebook helps friends and families to connect and communicate, it helps people say what they want to say and in some cases is a great way to get your voice heard on a higher platform.…
- 694 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Questions have been raised about the social impact of widespread use of social networking sites (SNS) like Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, and Twitter. Do these technologies isolate people and truncate their relationships? Or are there benefits associated with being connected to others in this way? The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project decided to examine SNS in a survey that explored people’s overall social networks and how use of these technologies is related to trust, tolerance, social support, and community and political engagement. The findings presented here paint a rich and complex picture of the role that digital technology plays in people’s social worlds. Wherever possible, we seek to disentangle whether people’s varying social behaviors and attitudes are related to the different ways they use social networking sites, or to other relevant demographic characteristics, such as age, gender and social class.…
- 13563 Words
- 55 Pages
Good Essays