On the surface, it would seem that the conservative notion of imposing strict limitations to protect public health would be best. Yet, all that does is promote isolation. Historically, the countries that have fared the best, are those that have met disease head on. (Globalization 101, n.d.) There are many casualties from such events, but in the long run, it strengthens the people, as they build resistance and immunity.
Since it is impossible to fully stop the transmission of any given disease, if we attempt to isolate ourselves, it simply makes us more sensitive to the disease when it finally breaks through. The Native Americans are a fantastic example of what happens when a group is exposed to a disease for which they have no defense.
What other …show more content…
How do you feel about genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?
Honestly, I have no real feelings about GMOs. I understand that this is a contentious use of science, but history is replete with many examples of such contentions. In 1786, the woolen workers of Leeds, UK, mounted opposition against what they called “Scribbling Machines” that robbed them of their income. (Economist’s View, 2007) Later, in the 1980s (and even to today), many opposed computer-controlled automation, for the same reason. Nuclear power, was originally embraced, much as GMOs initially were, as a demonstration of prosperity and power, and even as a potential cure for cancer. (Scientific American,